skip to Main Content

nUkiEmOLe pRonouncements #15/ 13 Sep 2019  neuRotic September 11th iMfaRcti0ns were perceptible non-ExemplaRy

nUkiEmOLe pRonouncements #15/ 13 Sep 2019 

neuRotic September 11th iMfaRcti0ns were perceptible non-ExemplaRy


My own candid appellate for the tRyst that which might occur, that which is relegated to be “chastised” as terrorism, but that which was cIAS overstepping under dictates by a-Hole el pResidenete’s office, the offal office i.e. geoRges-Enron. As we awaited, no one could get as close, evidently, as I had in 1983, for 2-offices visits, in Austin TX, before he ran for governor of that same state! As a speaker he was no ‘Alex Jones’. As a leadership, he was a dilemma until one sees post 1991 his ole-Fart, cRiiminal father gHW Bushwhacky. He pRotected his ole-Man from being despised for NSDU-238—too well. Too well, and we have suffered for that when 2000 came around and December 31st would usher in the most diabolical of crimes, for teevee, for Wall Street, for intel-Gence cRiminalities, for “the new-Rome of Plutocracy” to incriminate laws of the once-Waz going democracy-Bound edifice and pragmatist-Discretions to halt all wArs-wArring.


Sept 11th 2001 report’ by Gordon-Duff-featured-image-1-1


“Jim Fetzer [Editor’s note: As we approach the 18th observance of 9/11, I am republishing several blogs to reaffirm what really happened, who was responsible and why. This blog originally appeared on 12 September 2017 under the title, “What Really Happened: America Nuked on 9/11”. I have added two videos, “9/11: Who was responsible and why”, and Christopher Bollyn exposes Alex Jones as a 9/11 Zionist Gatekeeper”,] The Cambridge University Press journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, became an instant sensation by publishing target articles on specific, well-defined subjects and inviting…”[1]


That Christopher Bollyn, author, does not believe that D.E.W. did those buildings 1-thru-6 has yet to bet kept as renown, as I’ve not read nor heard/seen in writing he has changed his mind from total thermite bombing-Blasts. Where is the pulverizations-Dust coming from then? His stats otherwise are right-on. The stat on fact is that D.E.W. is a nuclear-Molecular: weapon, but not of Israeli-American acculturationing, but that of zionist-Gaudi-neocons facsimile of disbelief of good characterization to pull the wool and suggest 2,859 people were not murdered in NY-City that day, September 11th 2001. However, keep-on-Murdering was their bottom-Line until the deep-State could turnover a new line of deceptioning. Ohh, how not-Wonderful. This mess is a simple example of “anarcho-Syndicalist usurpation w impunity ‘topping’…” is what I am not wanting to complement  as theirs is anxiety attacks for not pRogRessive-Thinking, correctly.


“The whole of history is a process in which contradictions accumulate slowly, until they finally reach a critical point in which quantity becomes transformed into quality. The task of dialectics is to establish when such critical points emerge. For the last 10 or 20 years all the contradictions have been accumulating on a world scale. Now we see the results. In the history of the world since 1945 never have we seen such tremendous convulsions at all levels: economic, social, diplomatic and political. Never have the contradictions of the capitalist system been so clearly expressed in every part of the globe.

The present situation on a world scale resembles what is called a critical state in physics, where particles are subject to the wildest fluctuations. This creates certain difficulties for perspectives, which in the previous period were more predictable. Just as it is relatively easy to predict the laminar flow of a liquid, but difficult to predict the outcome of turbulence, so the world situation, balanced on the edge of chaos, can produce all kinds of surprises, both for the ruling class and for the Marxists.


The critical state in physics can be expressed by a simple experiment, in which the addition of a single grain to a heap of sand triggers a landslide. At the critical point, any accidental factor can trigger a serious crisis. This is known in modern physics as a “non-equilibrium system”. This phrase describes very well the present situation on a world scale. It is the fundamental characterisation of the historical epoch through which we are passing. This is what determines our analysis – not this or that event. It is necessary to look beyond the immediate particulars and look for the deeper historical processes.

There are certain historical periods in which nothing much seems to happen. For a long time after the end of the Second World War, the capitalist system succeeded in establishing a relative and temporary equilibrium. The division of the world between mighty Stalinist Russia and US imperialism led to the freezing of international relations for a whole historical period. At the same time, the long period of capitalist upswing led to a reduction of the tensions between the classes, at least in the advanced capitalist countries. Revolution was off the agenda for decades, although even at this stage there was the revolution of May 1968 in France. But now the whole process has been thrown into reverse.


These remarks refer, of course, to the advanced capitalist countries of Europe, Japan and the USA. For two-thirds of the world’s population living in the undeveloped countries, there was no respite. This was a period of almost continual upheavals, wars, revolutions and counterrevolutions. But for the developed capitalist countries, this was not the case. For a long time the conflicts and tensions were hidden beneath the surface. The working class was checked by the force of inertia. But now all the old equilibriums have been disrupted. The unseen forces have begun to assert themselves.

What is the main characteristic of the world situation? It is precisely the breakdown of the old stability, the violent disruption of the old equilibrium everywhere. Instead, wherever we look we see colossal and unprecedented instability and volatility at all levels. This is the most unstable period since 1945. Instead of boom, full employment and prosperity, there is crisis, growing unemployment and cuts in living standards, even in the most prosperous countries. The gap between rich and poor is constantly increasing and economic power is concentrated into fewer and fewer hands.”[2]


Someday the September 11th 2001 cRooks will be bRought in an urn and pulverized, is not good enough for me. How about you ‘folks’? Justice has been a moldy pizza, not a fresh approach w space-Time compendiums specifically well-Diagnosed. This is cRisis modicum wRit the system of Plutocracy, wRit. We have less space-Time to Un-wRit this iota that murdering, especially mass-Murdering, is allowed, because the deep-State eats shid-ski for two meals per-Day. The so-called: collapses, were not entirely that. Those were blasts resulting in “pulverizations” into particulate matter that rose from planet-Surface gRavity. While the tasks of the E.P.A. disapproved of testing what particulate-Matter was inside those plumes rising upwards for weeks-on-End, more than ominous, but totally unacceptable as fascist entropy necessitating closed-door/closed-Mouth, pea-bRain indemnities. That egregiousness was “total-anomalies” beridden-pRopaganda.


“Tuesday, September 11, 2001, was a non-teaching day for me.  I was home when the phone rang at 9 A.M.  It was my daughter, who was on a week’s vacation with her future husband.  “Turn on the TV,” she said.  “Why?” I asked.  “Haven’t you heard?  A plane hit the World Trade Tower.”

I turned the TV on and watched a plane crash into the Tower.  I said, “They just showed a replay.”  She quickly corrected me, “No, that’s another plane.”  And we talked as we watched in horror, learning that it was the South Tower this time.  Sitting next to my daughter was my future son-in-law; he had not had a day off from work in a year.  He had finally taken a week’s vacation so they could go to Cape Cod.  He worked on the 100th floor of the South Tower.  By chance, he had escaped the death that claimed 176 of his co-workers.

That was my introduction to the attacks.  Seventeen years have disappeared behind us, yet it seems like yesterday.  And yet again, it seems like long, long ago.


Over the next few days, as the government and the media accused Osama bin Laden and 19 Arabs of being responsible for the attacks, I told a friend that what I was hearing wasn’t believable; the official story was full of holes. I am a born and bred New Yorker with a long family history rooted in the NYC Fire and Police Departments, one grandfather having been the Deputy Chief of the Fire Department, the highest ranking uniformed firefighter, and the other a NYPD cop; a niece and her husband were NYPD detectives deeply involved in the response to that day’s attacks. Hearing the absurd official explanations and the deaths of so many innocent people, including many hundreds of firefighters, cops, and emergency workers, I felt a suspicious rage. It was a reaction that I couldn’t fully explain, but it set me on a search for the truth.  I proceeded in fits and starts, but by the fall of 2004, with the help of the extraordinary work of David Ray Griffin, Michael Ruppert, and other early skeptics, I could articulate the reasons for my initial intuition.  I set about creating and teaching a college course on what had come to be called 9/11.

But I no longer refer to the events of that day by those numbers.  Let me explain why.

By 2004 I had enough solid evidence to convince me that the U.S. government’s claims (and The 9/11 Commission Report) were fictitious.  They seemed so blatantly false that I concluded the attacks were a deep-state intelligence operation whose purpose was to initiate a national state of emergency to justify wars of aggression, known euphemistically as “the war on terror.”  The sophistication of the attacks, and the lack of any proffered evidence for the government’s claims, suggested that a great deal of planning had been involved.


Yet I was chagrined and amazed by so many people’s insouciant lack of interest in questioning and researching the most important world event since the assassination of President Kennedy.  I understood the various psychological dimensions of this denial, the fear, cognitive dissonance, etc., but I sensed something else as well.  For so many people their minds seemed to have been “made up” from the start.  I found that many young people were the exceptions, while most of their elders dared not question the official narrative.  These included many prominent leftist critics of American foreign policy, such as ((((((Noam Chomsky)))))), ((((((Howard Zinn)))))), Alexander Cockburn, and others, whose defenses of the official government and media explanations (when they even made such defenses; often they just trashed skeptics as “9/11 conspiracy nuts,” to quote Cockburn) totally lacked any scientific or logical rigor or even knowledge of the facts.  Now that seventeen years have elapsed, this seems truer than ever.  There is a long list of leftists who refuse to examine matter to this very day.  And most interestingly, they also do the same with the assassination of JFK, the other key seminal event of recent American history.


I kept thinking of the ongoing language and logic used to describe what had happened that terrible day in 2001 and in the weeks to follow.  It all seemed so clichéd and surreal, as if set phrases had it been extracted from some secret manual, phrases that rung with an historical resonance that cast a spell on the public, as if mass hypnosis were involved.  People seemed mesmerized as they spoke of the events in the official language that had been presented to them.

So with the promptings of people like Graeme MacQueen, Lance deHaven-Smith, T.H. ((((((Meyer)))))), et al., and much study and research, I have concluded that my initial intuitive skepticism was correct and that a process of linguistic mind-control was in place before, during, and after the attacks.  As with all good propaganda, the language had to be insinuated over time and introduced through intermediaries.  It had to seem “natural” and to flow out of events, not to precede them.  And it had to be repeated over and over again.

In summary form, I will list the language I believe “made up the minds” of those who have refused to examine the government’s claims about the September 11 attacks and the subsequent anthrax attacks.”[3]


My being followed by Dr. Ayman Farahwiri, while leaving Florida, after telling Mohammed Atta “o-f-f and leave these gals the fooking heck alone” in my attempt to get to prosecutors offices of Washington d-c, where I was hitch-hiking after camping and running outta gas. This alone made hm suspect, as I had heard his ranting reported kpfa-fm when I left Berkeley for San Jose, in fall. I was not angry that he had not been explaining NSDU-238 correctly for my need, but that his tenets were that his expose` got him booed outta the 1,100 strong conference center of medical-Doctors from around the country, 1991. This of course when I was heading to visit w Brande` in the southlands, LOS sprawl, bitchen-Cal. While there I had to post some mail and when I got to the “very metal postal-dRop box that was used for the anthrax-letters mailings 10-years after, I was starting to fit together what I had suspected. That I was wont to be involved as guinea-Pig for “the camp” al Qaeda, code-name by cIAS, I was also wont that what had happened at the barn outside, Waco, Texas where I had interviewed David Koresh, twice, before fBIS massacred all 68 people including children.

What kind of nation is the system-Perpetrating? As I kept my writings back in oRo-Bar studio, would those survive, ‘ve had to wonder time and again! That we know: Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, Alexander Cockburn, are wRitors and authors, they, none of them are investigative-Journalists, altho Cockburn is a Journalist, he live outside the US in England. Me, I am into research, and american-Socialism. The socialists I met w in NY City were not anarchists nor anarcho-Syndicalists as chainagang-Dickie is.


“Dr Judy Wood Where did the towers Go ?”

177,990 views, 2:24:57 mins.


I first met Dr. Judy Wood in June, 1991 North Carolina. I found heR omniscience regarding factorable logic, a tRuth that had a backlog and/or background of meanings. In 2003, I was again, at a talk in NY City and she was discussing w folks that she would get more data on what the features on attack were comprising as components of destruction.  There was no NSDU-238 in 6-towers atop the granite brought down by D.E.W. and thermite explosives, but in both aero-Liners approximately 2,000 in each aero-Jet upon impact. Therefore, 4,000 lbs. in the two combined aero-jets upon impacting each of the tallest towers. This fact is realizable to me, since I had protested on Long Island at Brookhaven National Laboratories w others. The third time there, at admin-Offices were we told by police to leave of face arrest for no apparent “reason” other than our permit would be revoked by threat, of course. 1994, 1996, and 1998.  “R” (28 Jan 2018)   

“After a lengthy investigation, special counsel Robert Mueller charged Russia made “multiple, systematic efforts to interfere in our election” and said the incursion “deserves the attention of every American.”

But former FBI investigators say their old boss didn’t feel the same concern when they uncovered multiple, systemic efforts by the Saudi government to assist the hijackers in the lead-up to the 9/11 attacks — a far more consequential, to say nothing of deadly, foreign influence operation on America.

As the head of the FBI at the time, they say Mueller was not nearly as interested in investigating that espionage conspiracy, which also involved foreign intelligence officers. Far from it, the record shows he covered up evidence pointing back to the Saudi Embassy and Riyadh — and may have even misled Congress about what he knew.

9/11 victims agree. “He was the master when it came to covering up the kingdom’s role in 9/11,” said survivor Sharon Premoli, who was pulled from the rubble of the World Trade Center 18 years ago.

“In October of 2001, Mueller shut down the government’s investigation after only three weeks, and then took part in the Bush [administration’s] campaign to block, obfuscate and generally stop anything about Saudi Arabia from being released,” added Premoli, now a plaintiff in the 9/11 lawsuit against Saudi Arabia.

In fact, Mueller threw up roadblocks in the path of his own investigators working the 9/11 case, while making it easier for Saudi suspects to escape questioning, multiple case agents told me. Then he deep-sixed what evidence his agents did manage to uncover, according to the 9/11 lawsuit against the Saudis.

Former FBI agent Steve Moore Time and again, agents were called off from pursuing leads back to the kingdom’s embassy in Washington, as well as its consulate in Los Angeles, where former FBI Agent Steven Moore headed a 9/11 task force looking into local contacts made by two of the 15 Saudi hijackers, Moore testified in an affidavit for the 9/11 lawsuit. He concluded that “diplomatic and intelligence personnel of Saudi Arabia knowingly provided material support to the two hijackers and facilitated the 9/11 plot.” Yet he and his team were not allowed to interview them, according to the suit.

In Washington, former FBI Agent John Guandolo, who worked terror cases out of the bureau’s DC office, said then-Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar “should have been treated as a terrorist suspect” for giving money to a woman who funded two of the 9/11 hijackers. But he was never questioned either, Guandolo said.

Instead, Mueller obliged what Guandolo called an “outrageous request” from Bandar within days of the attacks to help evacuate from the country dozens of Saudi officials, including at least one Osama bin Laden relative on the terror watch list. Mueller assured their safe passage to planes, using agents as personal escorts, according to FBI documents obtained by Judicial Watch. Agents who should have been interrogating the Saudis instead acted as their bodyguards.

In 2002, Mueller prevented agents from arresting the Saudi-sponsored al Qaeda cleric who privately counseled the Saudi hijackers, said Raymond Fournier, an agent with the Joint Terrorism Task Force in San Diego at the time. “He was responsible for vacating the arrest warrant for Anwar al-Awlaki for passport fraud,” Fournier said. He even ordered agents who detained the fiend at JFK to release him into the custody of a “Saudi representative,” Fournier said. The FBI closed their investigation of Awlaki, who was allowed to leave the US on a Saudi plane. “Shortly thereafter, the Fort Hood shooting occurred and Awlaki’s fingerprints were all over that incident,” said former FBI Agent Michael Biasello, who helped work the Texas terror case.

At the same time, Mueller removed a veteran agent from investigating a tip that an adviser to the Saudi royal family had met with some of the Saudi hijackers at his home in Sarasota, Fla., effectively killing the case, according to the lawsuit. The home was suddenly abandoned two weeks before 9/11.

Mueller even tried to shut down a congressional investigation into the Saudi hijackers and their contacts in LA and San Diego, said Bob Graham, who led the joint inquiry as Senate Intelligence Committee chair. “The strongest objections” to his staff investigators visiting FBI offices there came from the FBI director himself, said Graham, in a 2017 interview with Harper’s magazine. Among other things, Mueller refused their demands to question a paid FBI informant who roomed with the hijackers and even moved him to a safe house where they couldn’t find him, Graham said. Mueller, with the White House, redacted 28 pages detailing Saudi-9/11 ties from the congressional report.


He also gave testimony to Congress that was, at the very least, misleading. In an October 2002 closed-door hearing, Mueller claimed he found out about Saudi-9/11 connections only as a result of the joint inquiry’s investigative work: “[S]ome facts came to light here and to me, frankly, that had not come to light before.” Only, Moore said he gave Mueller “daily” briefings on such connections in 2001. Mueller also testified the hijackers “contacted no known terrorist sympathizers in the United States,” even though the FBI’s own case files showed they had contact with at least 14 terrorist suspects and sympathizers in the US prior to 9/11, including some working for the Saudi government. (In later testimony, he tried to walk this back, insisting he “had no intent to mislead.”)

While the Beltway media have portrayed Mueller as a by-the-book former Marine whose integrity is as square as his lantern-shaped jaw — a cop who can’t be compromised — others know better.

“He’s a villain, and an arrogant one to boot,” former FBI Agent Mark Wauck said, adding that his former boss has a long history of acting as a “servant of the deep state,” or the permanent DC ruling class.

A Mueller spokesman declined to comment. But some agents say he was merely

following White House orders.

“Any letting the Saudis off the hook came from the White House,” former Agent Mark Rossini said. “I can still see that photo of Bandar and Bush enjoying cigars on the balcony of the White House two days after 9/11.”

Still, others note the hypocrisy of Mueller going after President Trump for conspiring with a foreign enemy.

“Bottom line is, Mueller did not do an investigation on people involved in the 9/11 attacks who were connected to the Saudi government,” a former US counterintelligence official asserted. “Maybe if they were Russians, he would be interested. But he was not interested in investigating [Saudi] terrorists who murdered Americans.”[4]


Are the Gaudis on parole? No. In many of my now, 269 bloGs, I have determined that the fact georges-Enron allowed the Gaudis’ families et al-ski to go was a cover for not having Bandar Bush, arrested-arrested-arrested. While I am thankful to Alex Jones for onslaughts railing that the event on September 11th 2001 was a “false-Flag” he did delve into facet of investigations, but did he hinder or provide fodder for his initiation for “info-Wars to become the news center that now is, only”? His reports covered the sides on all gRounds but did he ever interview Dr. Judy Wood? Her videos are briefs on what visual-Acumen has to spate as “overlooked, how dare you”? My own visual-Acuity saw that dust from pulverized-Extent was why building-7 ought to have been the staging-Center that was supposed to be. Thus, where was Guiliani’ money. We found that his purchasing of 2-way radios was corrupt, and that he made $1.5 millions by cancelling the old-Ones for the new-Ones that did not have the range as the older models. Has he been brought to repay the city-Of: New York city? Why not? What else is going on was put-Options which 1,000’s of city’s Jewish investors saw fit to invest, thus involving themselves to corrupt-Acts, but of masse` murderings, not money-Laundering!


“I would appreciate hearing from readers whether they have come across a report in the print, TV, or NPR media of the highly professional four-year investigation of WTC Building 7’s demise. The international team of civil engineers concluded that the official story of Building 7’s destruction is entirely false. I reported their findings here.

I suspect that the expert report is already in the Memory Hole. Popular Mechanics, Wikipedia and CNN cannot label a distinguished team of experts “conspiracy theorists.” Therefore the presstitutes and assorted cover-up artists for the 9/11 false flag attack on the United States will simply act as if no such report exists. The vast majority of people in the world will never hear about the report. I doubt that the real perpetrators of 9/11 will even bother to hire their own team to “refute” the report as that would bring the report into the news, the last place the perpetrators want it to be.

False Flag Attack on classroom chalk board as the treacher goes over the lesson

Painting by Anthony Freda

The 9/11 Commission report was not an investigation and ignored all forensic evidence. The NIST simulation of Building 7’s collapse was rigged to get the desired result. The only real investigations have been done by private scientists, engineers, and architects. They have found clear evidence of the use of nano-thermite in the destruction of the twin towers. More than 100 First Responders have testified that they experienced a large number of explosions inside the towers, including a massive explosion in the sub-basement prior to the time the airliners are said to have hit the tower. Numerous military and civilian pilots have said that the flight maneuvers involved in the WTC and Pentagon attacks are beyond their skills and most certainly beyond the skills of the alleged hijackers. Wreckage of the airliners is surprisingly missing from impact sites. And so on and so on. That Building 7 was a controlled demolition is no longer disputable.


On the basis of the known evidence, knowledgeable and informed people have concluded that 9/11 was an inside job organized by Vice President Dick Cheney, his stable of neoconservatives, and Israel for the purpose of reconstructing the Middle East in Israel’s interest and enriching the US military/security complex in the process.

Robert Mueller in thought

Photo by Medill DC | CC BY 2.0

Most people are unaware of Robert Mueller’s role as FBI Director in protecting the official 9/11 story from the evidence. Paul Sperry reports in the New York Post the many actions Mueller took as FBI director to hide the facts from Congress and the public.”[5]


I have tried to be useful, to us, american-Socialists, as a professional-Proletariat, as technology and science has meant the molecular-Age would be morosely more “nano-Technic and intel-Gence technologies” since 1989. That variegation has kept me from having a family, from thinking about sexuality, and from contortions to my aRte and scientific-Investigations e.g. “electric-Universe and Cosmology” in particular, Ecology I continue to research and attestations for events that I became an apportionment as underground-Journalist (and poet) continues. The bourgeois-Tenets of non-Thinking are parables to people fooling themselves that they know facts by drinking beer and watching Fox-news, or merely listening to a few radio programs a week. Not enough people, the computer-Age is not the read tiny print on a cel-Phone age. While all of those are particulars of the facts on September 11, 2001, how? What we know as socialists and what we know of the deep-State is tRoubling to most investigators, altho they never state that amercian-Socialists “don’t know nor have they writors who have stated such and such in regard to ‘Directed Energy Weapons’ expose` on September 11th 2001” yet. Weld, may be the tRuth, but who other than myself has stated this and in such manner so as not to be redundant?


“Directed energy weapons (DEWs) are defined as electromagnetic systems capable of converting chemical or electrical energy to radiated energy and focusing it on a target, resulting in physical damage that degrades, neutralizes, defeats, or destroys an adversarial capability. Navy DEWs include systems that use High Energy Lasers (HEL) that emit photons, and High Power Microwaves (HPM) that release radiofrequency waves. The U.S. Navy uses DEWs for power projection and integrated defense missions. The ability to focus the radiated energy reliably and repeatedly at range, with precision and controllable effects, while producing measured physical damage, is the measure of DEW system effectiveness. Conversely, capabilities to increase the resilience or survivability of platforms or Sailors from DEW threats are part of the Counter Directed Energy Weapons (CDEW) program.

The Office of Naval Research has three weapons-oriented research

concentration areas: High Power Microwaves (HPM); Ultra-Short Pulse Laser (USPL) and Atmospheric Characterization; and Counter-Directed Energy Weapons and

High Energy Lasers (CDEW & HEL).

Research Concentration Area: CDEW and HEL

High energy lasers (HELs) lasers and high-power microwaves (HPM) systems as weapons have been under investigation since the 1960s and 70s. As an example of naval platform survivability and self-defense against small boat threats, the Office of Naval Research developed and tested the Maritime Laser Demonstrator (MLD), the first laser weapon system operated at sea. ONR and NRL later worked collaboratively with the Naval Sea Systems Command on the Solid State Laser Quick Reaction Capability Program (SSL-QRC) to actively deploy the first military HEL, the Laser Weapons System (LaWS) on the USS Ponce. Today, HEL research continues to offer breakthroughs in performance for continuous wave (CW) laser weapons.


The Counter-Directed Energy Weapons (CDEW) Program was initiated in response to the rapid development of high energy lasers (HEL) and high-power microwave (HPM)/high-power radio frequency (HPRF) threats being developed by potential foreign adversaries. The ONR Counter Directed Energy Weapons (CDEW) research program expands the understanding of the known sciences through both research and component testing to increase survivability and self-defense capabilities for U.S. Navy platforms. Directed energy weapons technology advancements and proliferation has raised the urgency of developing low-cost CDEW technologies for rapid deployment to Navy units. The ONR CDEW program addresses emerging directed energy threats in an operational, maritime construct containing three layers of defense: DEW detection, DEW effects mitigation, and unit protection.


Research Challenges and Opportunities

Scientific modeling and simulation of effects of HPRF and HEL capabilities against materials, electronics, sensors, and platforms in a maritime environment. These include high fidelity modeling, simulation and experimentation of material responses that lead to validated target-damage assessments or alternative mechanisms offering controlled, optimized effects during dynamic engagements.

The simulation and validation of CW laser beams’ optical performance and material (including metamaterials) responses in complex aero-thermal and aero-optics conditions, or that offers related aperture optical coating toughness, is of interest.

Novel instrumentation for detection of HEL and HPRF irradiation, including component development or the modeling and sensing of low level laser irradiation for off-axis (off-target directed) detection, characterization and source geo-location.

HEL and HPRF mitigation and protection components, including novel filters, signal-noise mitigation and utilizing material obscurants. Techniques to synthetically degrade the atmosphere for directed energy propagation are of interest, or where they otherwise provide protection to sensors, electronic systems, platforms and naval personnel. Efforts proposed for this research challenge should have clear and understandable scientific, technical or operational merits for use in the maritime environments where naval platforms (air, surface, subsurface, Marine, etc.) operate and might encounter adversaries that utilize directed energy capabilities.

HEL and HPM protection methods, including laser material hardening and electronic hardening, such as the development of metamaterials, nano scale materials, and nonlinear materials that enhance and ensure platform survival, operation and integrity. Research includes, but is not limited to, toughening and protection methods for electronic/optical subsystem or functions like communications, navigation, and ISR sensor subsystems, and for occupant protection. Research related to active and passive circuit protection that limit HPRF attack effectiveness.

For HEL, research leading to novel naval laser subsystem, beam director and fire control architectures, including advanced design power architectures for low-duty cycle and CW laser applications offering advantages of reduced size, weight and power with cooling (SWAP-C) to reduce naval platform integration impact. Of particular interest are CW laser components, offering higher brightness with high power beam combining technologies, or controlled micro-channel optical component cooling methods for the reduction of thermal distortions leading to high beam quality. Additionally, research leading to improvements in DEW system tracking sensors, target illuminators and automated target recognition components performance or robustness offering high accuracy pose/trajectory estimation, including those which offer tracking through intermittent or partial obscured maritime viewing conditions. Efforts proposed to this research challenge should have clear and understandable merit for use in the maritime environments where naval platforms operate.”[6]


Finally, I have found the diminutive definition and diabolical context for and of US: military-Hegemonyite weapons systems that have been portrayed in the downbeat -Dawning of ‘the destructive-Template’ the word-Term that should have mentioned ever-moreso than buildings “collapsed” which of course those never did.  Pulverized, blown as they were to be processed into pulverized: steel-Dust, as never before seen my masse` eyeballs, and the world-Overtly. My. What use for pulverizing the strongest steel building ever built—that of WTC NY City. What was the use for whatever was necessity. Was that what “the ‘deep-State’ could not get their ways otherwise”?


“That so many of the visas were issued from a single office may seem like a minor footnote at first glance, but it is not. In fact, the Jeddah Consulate is not just another US Consular Office. It has a history of issuing visas to terrorists at the request of the CIA. Just ask Michael Springmann. This is his story.”[7]


This stat all by the loathesome, was not lonesome-Fact but fact-Fact. There was a cIAS doorway to anarcho-Syndicalist proceedings. Here they goofed-Odd as others would do, as though given a fascist-Que, or merely the system’s cause of technocratic-Plutocracy “false-Que”. Lookey folks, the tRaumatizationing of September 11th 2001 is yet on-Goings, those that we should bring into moral-compass focus for ourselves and the global-Village especially. There were lots and lotsa cRiminal and they are yet hoose-Gow: loose.


“But Ryan’s curiosity about UL’s role in the certification of the World Trade Center steel was piqued when, in 2003, he began to question the lies that the Bush administration had used to justify the invasion of Iraq, and, eventually, to question the official story of September 11th itself. Recalling Knoblauch’s comments about UL’s role in certifying the Trade Center steel shortly after 9/11, Ryan began to take a professional interest in the official investigation into the Twin Towers’ destruction, an investigation in which UL itself was to play a part.

As Ryan began to learn more about the issues involved with the destruction of the towers and the ongoing investigation into that destruction, his concerns only grew. Why had the actual steel evidence of the towers’ destruction been illegally removed and disposed of before a proper investigation could take place? Why did not one or two, but three modern, steel-frame buildings completely collapse due to fire on 9/11 given that such an event had never taken place before? Why did the towers fail at all when John Skilling, the structural engineer responsible for designing the towers, claimed in 1993—just five years before his death—that his own analysis of jet plane crashes and ensuing fires in the towers had concluded  that “the building structure would still be there”? And why had Knoblauch himself bragged about UL’s role in testing the World Trade Center steel—a test that would have rated the floor components for two hours of fire resistance and the building columns for three hours—when the North Tower “failed” in 102 minutes and the South Tower came down in just 56 minutes?

These concerns prompted Ryan, in October 2003, to write directly to Loring Knoblauch, outlining his thoughts and “asking what [Knoblauch] was doing to protect our reputation.” But if Ryan was expecting Knoblauch to put his mind at ease about these issues, he was sorely disappointed. Instead, Knoblauch—who included Tom Chapin, then the head of UL’s fire resistance division, in the email chain—wrote a response that only raised more questions than it answered.


KEVIN RYAN: Knoblauch copied Tom Chapin on his response to me, because it was Tom’s job as the leader of the fire resistance division to really address these kinds of things. And interestingly, Tom Chapin had written a letter to the editors at The New York Times in 2002 where he basically admitted, again, that UL’s testing had been behind the fire resistance of the World Trade Center towers. And so I’ve written about that a little bit, but he was very clear that the World Trade Center stood for as long as it did because of UL’s testing. And the problem of course with that is that the South Tower lasted for only 56 minutes after it was hit, and the testing that was required by New York City code was three hours of fire resistance for the columns and two hours for the floor assemblies. So 56 minutes and those ratings do not add up. That’s just not something that should go unquestioned.

So Loring Knoblauch wrote back to me after my questions in—it must have been October 2003 when I wrote to him. He wrote back to me a month later and he said all these things about how the company had tested the steel components used to build the World Trade Center towers. What he meant is we had tested samples of those and provided ratings for fire resistance to the New York City code—again, three hours for columns and two hours for floor assemblies. And that information established the confidence that the buildings would stand in those fire durations. And the test that was used was ASTM E119, which is the standard test used for this purpose. And UL is the leader in doing that testing, so it wasn’t a surprise.

And not only that, but NIST—the government agency NIST [the National Institute of Standards and Technology]—had made clear in some of their progress reports that UL had consulted with the construction companies for the World Trade Center towers, and throughout the building of the buildings that UL had provided that information. So it’s really not a surprise at all.


And Tom Chapin replied further to me that the NIST agency was doing an investigation and asked me, basically, to have patience. And I did for maybe the next year.

In 2002, NIST began its three-year, $16 million study of the Twin Towers’ “failure.” Tom Chapin had assured Ryan that UL was cooperating with this investigation and that his concerns would be allayed once the final report was released. But by 2004, it was already clear that there were serious problems with that report and its preliminary findings, including findings from tests conducted by UL on mock-ups of the WTC floor assemblies that contradicted NIST’s own conclusions about the buildings’ destruction.

RYAN: Well, it’s very important to understand that with the official accounts for the World Trade Center, there were a number of explanations given in the early years. And for the towers the one that was settled upon and that lasted for three years was the pancake theory.

And the pancake theory was this concept where the floor assemblies had heated up and sagged and this steel had softened or weakened and then they started to collapse upon each other in a pancake fashion. And then the columns basically just folded inward. So that was the official account, really. It was given by the FEMA investigators Corley and Thornton and others—who coincidentally had also given us the official account for the Oklahoma City bombing. But in this video from the television program Nova, it was captured for everyone’s benefit in little videos  . . . animations. And so the pancake theory was the official account.


And UL tested the floor assemblies basically for the possibility of this in August 2004. So this was, again, nine months or ten months after I had asked my original questions. And they did so by using different assemblies with varying amounts of fireproofing. One of the assemblies had basically no fireproofing on it at all, and they ran it through this furnace in this ASTM E119 test and concluded in the end that there would be no collapse. That the floors would not collapse even at temperatures and times greater than what we’re seeing at the World Trade Center.

And they made that clear. NIST made this clear, that the pancake theory was not supported. So that left us all at that time with no explanation, in 2004, three years later. Having invaded Iraq, having done so much to invest in the official account that the World Trade Center had been destroyed by these planes. And that was a difficult situation for NIST and for everyone.

Realizing that UL was not pressing NIST on the discrepancies in its findings, Kevin Ryan took matters into his own hands and, on November 11, 2004, wrote directly to Frank Gayle, the director of NIST’s Twin Towers investigation. That email began:”[8]


The Gaudis did not do the twin-Towers masse` murder, the involvers did. Who were those persons-groups, anarcho-Syndicalists. They, of course were a family of over-Involvements because O.B.L. was a mite haughty about sands need insurance. The cIAS were, evidently the mighty “welding agent” or precipitators of obsequious nano-Technology will not survive w.o. this surety for and of ‘deep-state’ lies premising, or merely premising?


“Prime suspect in the New York and Washington terrorists attacks, branded by the FBI as an “international terrorist” for his role in the African US embassy bombings, Saudi born Osama bin Laden was recruited during the Soviet-Afghan war “ironically under the auspices of the CIA, to fight Soviet invaders”. [1]

In 1979 “the largest covert operation in the history of the CIA” was launched in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in support of the pro-Communist government of Babrak Kamal. [2]:

With the active encouragement of the CIA and Pakistan’s ISI [Inter Services Intelligence], who wanted to turn the Afghan jihad into a global war waged by all Muslim states against the Soviet Union, some 35,000 Muslim radicals from 40 Islamic countries joined Afghanistan’s fight between 1982 and 1992. Tens of thousands more came to study in Pakistani madrasahs. Eventually more than 100,000 foreign Muslim radicals were directly influenced by the Afghan jihad.[3]

The Islamic “jihad” was supported by the United States and Saudi Arabia with a significant part of the funding generated from the Golden Crescent drug trade:

In March 1985, President Reagan signed National Security Decision Directive 166,…[which] authorize[d] stepped-up covert military aid to the mujahideen, and it made clear that the secret Afghan war had a new goal: to defeat Soviet troops in Afghanistan through covert action and encourage a Soviet withdrawal. The new covert U.S. assistance began with a dramatic increase in arms supplies — a steady rise to 65,000 tons annually by 1987, … as well as a “ceaseless stream” of CIA and Pentagon specialists who traveled to the secret headquarters of Pakistan’s ISI on the main road near Rawalpindi, Pakistan. There the CIA specialists met with Pakistani intelligence officers to help plan operations for the Afghan rebels.[4]


The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) using Pakistan’s military Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) played a key role in training the Mujahideen. In turn, the CIA sponsored guerrilla training was integrated with the teachings of Islam:

Predominant themes were that Islam was a complete socio-political ideology, that holy Islam was being violated by the atheistic Soviet troops, and that the Islamic people of Afghanistan should reassert their independence by overthrowing the leftist Afghan regime propped up by Moscow.[5]

Pakistan’s Intelligence Apparatus

Pakistan’s ISI was used as a “go-between”. The CIA covert support to the “jihad” operated indirectly through the Pakistani ISI, –i.e. the CIA did not channel its support directly to the Mujahideen. In other words, for these covert operations to be “successful”, Washington was careful not to reveal the ultimate objective of the “jihad”, which consisted in destroying the Soviet Union.

In the words of CIA’s Milton Beardman “We didn’t train Arabs”. Yet according to Abdel Monam Saidali, of the Al-aram Center for Strategic Studies in Cairo, bin Laden and the “Afghan Arabs” had been imparted “with very sophisticated types of training that was allowed to them by the CIA” [6]

CIA’s Beardman confirmed, in this regard, that Osama bin Laden was not aware of the role he was playing on behalf of Washington. In the words of bin Laden (quoted by Beardman): “neither I, nor my brothers saw evidence of American help”. [7]


Motivated by nationalism and religious fervor, the Islamic warriors were unaware that they were fighting the Soviet Army on behalf of Uncle Sam. While there were contacts at the upper levels of the intelligence hierarchy, Islamic rebel leaders in [war] theatre had no contacts with Washington or the CIA.

With CIA backing and the funneling of massive amounts of US military aid, the Pakistani ISI had developed into a “parallel structure wielding enormous power over all aspects of government”. [8] The ISI had a staff composed of military and intelligence officers, bureaucrats, undercover agents and informers, estimated at 150,000. [9]

Meanwhile, CIA operations had also reinforced the Pakistani military regime led by General Zia Ul Haq:

‘Relations between the CIA and the ISI [Pakistan’s military intelligence] had grown increasingly warm following [General] Zia’s ouster of Bhutto and the advent of the military regime,’… During most of the Afghan war, Pakistan was more aggressively anti-Soviet than even the United States. Soon after the Soviet military invaded Afghanistan in 1980, Zia [ul Haq] sent his ISI chief to destabilize the Soviet Central Asian states. The CIA only agreed to this plan in October 1984…. `the CIA was more cautious than the Pakistanis.’ Both Pakistan and the United States took the line of deception on Afghanistan with a public posture of negotiating a settlement while privately agreeing that military escalation was the best course.[10]”[9]


Weld. That Osama bin Ladin was on cIAS role, but not when he bombed the facilties in Africa, made the US-deep-State angry! My how come? The stats on Khalid Shaik Mohammed was covert-Action, because by covering-Up that he was lefthand-Man to O.B.L. was obviated, more than likely by Ayman Farahwiri being the second-in-command, of the so-called “camp-Fellows”. Whereupon, Ayman, whom I mentioned above, was as cagey a medical-Doctor as anyone-Else on this planet. Besides, O.B.L. had started the Jihad against US-military, since the invasion of Iraq-lands was for Oiel, and the Gaudis did not want US-bases in their landscape, err-Weld sandscapes. Sooo, O.B.L. did not plan nor involve himself w Gaudi’s brethren, since he was basically outlawed by them. The fBIS never did press charges nor assert, either that O.B.L. was guilty nor had planned, That meant the fBIS had to go overseas and find-out who in dumb-Fool capitalism was guilty and go paid for planning and carrying-out the act. Weld, that also was what will be found out about all that. Thus, when stats came in that Khalid Shaik Mohammad  had planned the indemnity, who carried that out was Bush crime Family, Mossad operative, cIAS insiders, capitol-Hill insiders, and chaingang-Dickie coupled to rummy-Rumsfeld, all gHW Bushwhackys cRonies, as that goon was yet behind the cIAS scenes.


Whence, Khalid Shaik Mohammed 2003, was located in Indonesia, and arrested in 2005, and has been in jail in Guantanamo w.o. tRial, since we have to feel happy and fRee. What? Not whatever is answer! Funny that ennui-Kissinger was not involved in this because he would have been too close, possibly carrying-out openings that he was not espionage was his case. Obstructing-Justice, the cIAS insiders lied, the fBIS operative lied, the penataGooons operatives lied. Might have been they were known was going tobe giving Justice due clause. Thus, O.B.L. was guilty and not brought to tRial to be questioned, left the Gaudi royals as goons connected to goons, as the guinea’s were already, finally, at last arrested. No. They are at large and I am not talking about the nine hijackers who were officially sent home, never sent to trial, never like Khalid Shaik Mohammed. The ex-Mossad were not the keepors of D.E.W. from Brookhaven standpoints in my analysis. Believe me they were as involved and other operative were involved, as primary to their being known about 19-witnesses were murdered. Where is that legacy wRit large fellow americans of the new-Rome is Plutocracy.


“As Canadian journalist and media critic Barrie Zwicker explained in his 2006 book Towers of Deception: The Media Cover-up of 9/11, mainstream journalists throughout Canada and the Western world failed spectacularly in their role to critically examine the terrorist attacks of September 11th 2001 and its consequences. [1]

Pertinent questions as to ulterior motives for a deadly military invasion of Afghanistan, or about the failure to scramble military aircraft to intercept the hijacked airplanes when they veered off course were never asked in the prominent newspapers, television networks and other major media organs of the day. Any skeptical inquiry of the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the months immediately following the attacks was confined to ‘limited hang-outs’ along the lines of the CIA ‘never getting its act together’ and ‘controversies’ about the crime possibly being ‘blow-back’ from America’s oppressive policies in the Middle East and elsewhere. [2]

One national broadcaster in Canada, however, proved to be an exception to this trend. VISION TV is a Canadian cable and satellite specialty channel based in Toronto reaching an estimated 10 million homes. It was largely due to Zwicker’s influence as VISION TV’s resident media critic that the provocative discussion featured on this week’s show ever made it to the public airwaves.


On the evening of March 14, 2002, the network broadcast a round table on the 2001 terrorist attacks on a special installment of VisionTV Insight: Mediafile. This discussion would include one of the few appearances in Canadian media by U.S. based investigative journalist Michael C. Ruppert.

Ruppert was, along with Professor Michel Chossudovsky of the Centre for Research on Globalization, one of the very first figures in the world to intelligently refute the official story of the September 11th attacks. He had outlined his key arguments in a hard hitting monthly newsletter called From The Wilderness, as well as on his online site He had also given a series of talks across the United States and Canada detailing his problems with the official story.

The conversation featured in this week’s Global Research News Hour radio program as it debuts its eighth regular broadcast season sees Ruppert face critical, albeit respectful push-back from at least two of the panelists. The discussion delved not only into the unanswered questions mentioned above, but also put them into the context of America’s imperial conquest of oil resources, and the role of drug money, including the proceeds of Afghanistan’s illicit opium trade, in financing the global economy. Questions relating to the vulnerability of Canadian sovereignty, the anti-democratic nature of ‘anti-terrorism’ legislation, and the role of journalists in the face of these developments likewise rise to the fore.”[10]


Michael Rupert and I talked about four-Times w one-Another, seems that he was either concerned citizen or police-Officer on duty. I first hear him in 2004 because I had to drive round tRip to Wyoming University—120 miles round tRip–to practice knowledge of cyber-Space and input data control. Meanwhile, what he had done was good, was erstwhile, calibrated for producing social-Media into knowns as well as response. These sessions w Barrie Zwicker were righteous. His “fromthewilderness” website was blogs made into enterprising videos.


<14 Sep 2019>

There are two more aspects, that will more repletely cover my time involvements as anti-Terrorist from NY City. First of all, I sought an art’s studio in dN-tN san fRan, and in that office was a man w whom I spoke named, after my NY City visit of 1996. That was Richard Gage, of Architects and engineers, a group he helped pool together starting in 2005. Whereas, I was poet/tRukkoR and NY City born, my interests were peaked. He was there when I returned the next year to inquire was there space yet available. He was the person w whom I sked that briefly. I expressly mentioned that “we protectors, were not out of the clear, regarding which site they would want to terrorize, but that they would and I had warmed 100’s of persons in NY city on my recent tRek. Gage seemed n to be very intimately attached nor concerned. Sooo, I told him that I hope he will remember my visit here, being pertinent. Years later when I did briefly state a hello, I believe in little-D: Denver, he had not recollection of my premising him in person 12-years before.

Next, the compendium on Khalid Shaik Mohammed prime-suspect, masse` murderer and cIAS numero-Uno most waterboarding patron of disgusts. First here, the Corbett Report, w James Pilato weekly w James Corbett. I first met Jame Corbett in Toronto Canada 1998, on my 2nd u.s.a./Canada poets and girl-Hunt for my camera’s and ever-changing cyber-space technics on cultural-Expansions. We chatted, while Prof. Michel Choussdousky was awaited on a public-speech—which may actually been forewarnings on terrorism in NY City or other urban space-Places.


Queue the 9/11 Distraction Story – #NewWorldNextWeek

26,096 views Published on Sep 5, 2019  “


Khalid Shaik Mohammed prime-suspect is, that I have found, best resourcefully well done in Intercept, which I oNLY received today, heads-up. Here’s what I found that reads commendably. When I went looking for the “real-culprit” who would perpetrate the next attack in NY City WTC-buildings, I had already been doling out such since the first-attacks in 1993. The main “feature” that I find since actual bombing and D.E.W. was Sept 11th 2001, was that of deliberate “covetous for cover-ups“ which indicated that the propaganda-Machine was, morosely blocking any and all “populous and professionals-Other” to be of service as ‘lips-Service’ was all impunity commands—at that deep-state pointed view incision.


“On or around March 18, interrogators made Mohammed choose between the waterboard and sleep deprivation. “Subject immediately turned away from his cell door and appropriately positioned himself in the middle of the room for ‘standing sleep deprivation,’” a cable notes.

C06669354 4 pages

Sleep Deprivation

On March 23, at 9 p.m., Mohammed had been subjected to sleep deprivation tactics for 132 hours. He spent most of that time standing, his wrists shackled at or above his head.

He was “only a man,” he had told his interrogators philosophically, “and men break.”

That day, at 30-minute intervals, interrogators entered his cell and demanded information.

“Nothing new,” Mohammed said. At times, he turned “slowly to allow his entire body to be doused” with water “as instructed,” a cable states.

C06669362 4 pages

“If I don’t break tomorrow, it will be the next day,” Mohammed told his interrogators.

By March 25, Mohammed was closer to “automatic conformity,” according to a later cable. He wrote and wrote, filling 20 pages. He was finally allowed to sleep, albeit naked and shackled on the floor. After about three weeks and four days, his enhanced interrogation was over.

C06718080 2 pages

C06669361 3 pages

The Senate report does not explain why Mohammed’s enhanced interrogation ended. But the cables suggest that interrogators thought that Mohammed had entered a new, more compliant phase. “As anticipated, today was a pivotal day for KSM,” a psychologist noted on March 25.


“KSM remains attentive and responsive,” an April assessment states. “He continues to volunteer relevant spontaneous and unsolicited information. His conditioning becomes more effective each day in terms of desired automatic conformity to debriefing preparations as well as his judged level of engagement in the ensuing debriefing dialogue.”

That same month, Mohammed asked how his interrogator viewed his level of cooperation. On a scale of 1 to 100 (with 1 being completely dishonest), KSM registered about 50 or 60, an interrogator said.

C06718676…3 pages

This evaluation “distressed” Mohammed, who said “he had something more to tell,” a cable states. He began, in a low, solemn tone, the story of American Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, who had been kidnapped and beheaded in Pakistan. Mohammed claimed that he had murdered Pearl, offering the confession as evidence that he was “truthful about everything.”

C06718673…3 pages

The interrogation team cabled that it “remains vigilant,” believing that Mohammed maintained “some level of deception.” But the team also wrote that Mohammed was not “identifiably” engaging “in overt behaviors of calculated or obvious resistance.”[11]


Where Life does not have a drag, the imbecilic-Sleaze to maintain the illicit-system, will ask or get pushy, to prevail. That the egalomaniacs do not have control is also to the deep-States surrogation to disregard-Facts and expunge logical analysis, too! The plutocracy obviously, felt that Sept 11th 2001 was to be a portentous-Event—before and after! However, this, the latter regarding “portentous-Event” is standardized immediately, thus emblematic for both fBIS and ciIAS, as well as NSA and DIA, to cover their exposed behinds. The intel-Gence—as georges-Enron sooo states the used-Often word-Term—is also emblematic, and not a vituperative sidelight. But, full interrogations “lamps” perforce.


More, in sToRiEs (this website), as I continue adding onto the proxilities and facts that stats do not belie. Wherefore, regarding my knowing-Times w Mohammad Atta–now, deceased on Sept 11th 2001—and Zacarias Moussaoui. I had met M. Atta in Libya, a cIAS US-military camp. By 1989, I had heard enough jabbering about how our “defense-Is-Invasion: necessity for the new-Rome”. I more than figured that a surprise would be installed behind yet the usages of NSDU-238, as I had researched results of Tom Kippur and the exports of uranium-238 .to the IDF. The zionism was murdering 39 sailors on board the USS-Liberty in 1968, when the V-C-L war was morosely propagandized. I had not forgotten that stat. As more and more money-Appropriations are asking for during V-C-L what I termed “merely-Vietnam” would most likely keep-on-Happening, unless oiel-as-Phooel was halted by 1972-73. When the we-Boomers knew, in 1966, that Laos had been bombed, repeatedly and that tRick-Dick was about to do the same, similar capitalist-Monopoly gloat bombing inside Cambodia. Thus, I had arrived at the lie-Line: “one doesn’t schedule Wars as much as plan them to happen”!


“U.S. Intelligence 9/11 and Iraq: A Whistleblower’s Story” 58:30 mins. 141,981 views  Veteran FBI staff attorney Coleen Rowley details how the FBI dismissed reports from her office that may have led the Bureau to the center of Al Qaeda’s 9/11 plot. [9/2008] [Show ID: 15113]


Why ever tRust the zionist-Fascists, who are worse than nazi’s in many “radicalized-Versions of and for in-auspice”? Who are not Israels sooo much as not the religion-Valuing others, not enough to formulate a Constitution? Yes. When?


“Cancers in Fallujah catapulted from 40 cases among 100,000 people in 1991 to at least 1,600 by 2005. In a 2010International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health article, Busby and two colleagues, Malak Hamden and Entesar Ariabi, reported a 38-fold increase in leukemia, a 10-fold increase in breast cancer, and infant mortality rates eight times higher than in neighboring Kuwait.

Fallujah-baby Busby sampled the hair of Fallujah women with deformed babies and found slightly enriched uranium. He found the same thing in the soil. “The only possible source was the weapons,” he states.

These numbers are probably low. “Iraqi women whose children have birth defects feel stigmatized and often don’t report them,” says Mozhgan Savabieasfahani, a Michigan-based environmental toxicologist who won the 2015 Rachel Carson Award.

IRRADIATED IRAQ   The Nuclear Nightmare We Left Behind, The Washington Spectator,  By Barbara Koeppel   30 Mar 16 When the United States revealed in January that it is testing a more nimble, more precise version of its B61 atom bomb, some were immediately alarmed. General James Cartwright, a former strategist for President Obama, warned that “going smaller” could make nuclear weapons “more thinkable” and “more usable.”

However, what is little known is that for the past 25 years, the United States and its allies have routinely used radioactive weapons in battle, in the form of warheads and explosives made with depleted, undepleted, or slightly enriched uranium. While the Department of Defense (DOD) calls these weapons “conventional” (non-nuclear), they are radioactive and chemically toxic. In Iraq, where the United States and its partners waged two wars, toxic waste covers the country and poisons the people. U.S. veterans are also sick and dying.

Scott Ritter, a former Marine Corps officer in Iraq and United Nations weapons inspector, told me, “The irony is we invaded Iraq in 2003 to destroy its non-existent WMD [weapons of mass destruction]. To do it, we fired these new weapons, causing radioactive casualties.”

The weapons were first used in 1991 during Desert Storm, when the U.S. military fired guided bombs and missiles containing depleted uranium (DU), a waste product from nuclear reactors. The Department of Defense (DOD) particularly prized them because, with dramatic density, speed, and heat, they blasted through tanks and bunkers.

Within one or two years, grotesque birth defects spiraled—such as babies with two heads. Or missing eyes, hands, and legs. Or stomachs and brains inside out.


Keith Baverstock, who headed the radiological section of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Center of Environment and Health in the 1990s, explained why: When uranium weapons explode, their massive blasts produce gray or black clouds of uranium oxide dust particles. These float for miles, people breathe them, and the dust lodges in their lungs. From there, they seep into the lymph system and blood, flow throughout the body, and bind to the genes and chromosomes, causing them to mutate. First, they trigger birth defects. Within five or more years, cancer. Organs, often the kidneys, fail.

At one Basra hospital, leukemia cases in children up to age 14 doubled from 1992 to 1999, says Amy Hagopian, a University of Washington School of Public Health professor. Birth defects also surged, from 37 in 1990 to 254 in 2001, according to a 2005 article in Environmental Health.

Leukemia—cancer of the blood—develops quickly. Chris Busby, a British chemical physicist, explains: “Blood cells are the most easily damaged by radiation and duplicate rapidly. We’ve known this since Hiroshima.”

Dai Williams, an independent weapons researcher in Britain, says the dust emits alpha radiation—20 times more damaging than the gamma radiation from nuclear weapons. The military insists the dust is harmless because it can’t penetrate the skin. They ignore that it can be inhaled.

Fast forward to 2003. When the United States reinvaded Iraq, it launched bunker-busting guided bombs, cruise missiles, and TOW anti-tank missiles. It also fired new thermobaric warheads—much stronger explosives with stunningly large blasts. Many of these, says Ritter, contained some type of uranium, whether depleted, undepleted, or slightly enriched.

Williams says thermobaric weapons explode at extremely high temperatures and “the only material that can do that is uranium.” He adds that while today’s nuclear weapons are nominally subject to international regulations, no existing arms protocol addresses uranium in a non-nuclear context.

While the U.S. government has cleaned up some contaminated sites at home—such as a former uranium munitions plant in Concord, Mass.—it has yet to acknowledge the mess in Iraq.

“Iraq is one large hazardous waste site,” Ritter says. “If it was the U.S., the Environmental Protection Agency would declare it a Superfund site and order it be cleaned.”…”[12]


This one soul, who since, 1951 has underscored that the first nuclear-Molecular, NSDU-238 would soon be used, when illegal-Defense, aggressor-Stances has always equaled the use of “egregiousness-Extent” over that of rationale not to use and to cleanse the upper-Atmosphere of above ground testings, as well as Ionizationings w usages of both chemicals as well as stRontium-90. That gHW Bushwhacky invaded Iraq w.o. provocations, came about to underscore the neo-Cpns pereciences for having illegal-Wars and therefore “lies of Deceptions” to enterprise those invasions. Did they also plan to use Khalid Shaik Mohammed, or did he “egregiously hire them: zionists, neo-Con’s, fBIS, cIAS, dIAS, sooo that the we-people would have ever-worsening intel-Gence and fewer protections w our-Constitution? The answer evidently, was that “dual-citizenship” Israel and u.s.a. was as good as the 45 beating the dRaw of a 45!


I could see that “collateral-Damage” would ensue in 1989, prior to usages of ur-238, hardly depleted-Uranium. That georges-Enron had too, heard from me in 1983 discussions on “nucleaRism” in Austin TX, that any usage of uranium would be determinable as anti-Peace and therefore a worse form of governance. His daddy was protecting georges-Enron from being as stupid as he was. I do not think sooo, because gHW Bushwhacky was not planning, yet those who planned were not protecting gerorges-Enron but gHW Bushwhacky the 1991 guilty of masse` murderer fookeR-Ahole w psychopathic pea-bRain, that financing neo-Liberalism thru “nuclear-Molecular: weapon, un-Used and UN-tested, but knowingly a total-Carcineogenetic:” certainly was. Stupidity, asinine-Psychopathic, and money-Mongering.


Ecology is venerable permaculture, when given several-Years, and ecosystems of regeneration via permaculture, become the Ecology “once again”.


<16 Sep 2019>

The dust-Palls characterized by winds, yes, buy by morose finer-Particlizationings due pulverizations. As I have stated above: The so-called: collapses, were not entirely that. Those were blasts resulting in “pulverizations” into particulate matter that rose from planet-Surface gRavity. While the tasks of the E.P.A. disapproved of testing what particulate-Matter was inside those plumes rising upwards for weeks-on-End, more than ominous, but totally unacceptable as fascist entropy necessitating closed-door/closed-Mouth, pea-bRain indemnities. That egregiousness was “total-anomalies” beridden-pRopaganda.


When I heard, that there were no fighter-Jets scrambled, or that those could and would bring: down w.o. mass-Firing 20mm and 50mm bullets into a passenger-liner, “blatantly trying to kill all on-Board” I was of mixed opinion as to why “no jets were allowed at all in aero-Space” other than to get the Gaudis out the nation-state. Why? What oligarchic-Deceit is that, now? What is elsewise, ongoing? Then, I heard that Philip Zelikow, has been a dual-citizenship, and preceded from there w better attuned acumen.



The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have ravaged those countries, and resulted in a permanent state of instability and destruction.

Using the attacks as an excuse, the U.S. conducted wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that would have serious consequences on the U.S. economy and the world rule of law. Many people throughout the world believe that the U.S. squandered a wave of world goodwill resulting from the attacks. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have ravaged those countries, and resulted in a permanent state of instability and destruction. “The war never — the choice of the Afghan people — has done great harm to our people for all sorts of different local, national, regional and international reasons. Widespread corruption, the massive arming of militias, the fueling of war by neighboring countries, the civilian losses and night raids and deterioration of security have all undermined our children’s education, our women’s ability to work, our ability to provide basic social services to the neediest part of the population,” said Orzala Ashraf Nemat, an Afghan human rights activist.


One of the lessons to be drawn from that tragedy is that violence begets violence and intolerance breeds intolerance. Unless there is a new approach to preventing terrorist acts we will continue to live under the threat of terror. Permanent confrontation is not the answer. While it is easy to create enemies, it is much harder to understand the “other”, a necessary approach if we wish to eliminate conflict and honor the desire for peace and security of all people in the world.”[13]


The egRegiousness-extent shows that plutocrats-Philosophy is deep-State not-so-Much “secretized”. Wars of egregiousness-Extent are temporal-Insistence of and for short-teRm gain, yet always w long-Lasting affectations to halt change and to halt pRogRess, for the capitalist-Pigs: totalitarianism, to be oNLY existent reason to go to Mars on a fluke that that planet is the oNY one to settle, when all else shows that is the worst, planet—altho maybe the closest for whatever US: military-Hegemonyites reasons?


“The article by Jérôme Gygax and Nancy Snow is titled “9/11 and the Advent of Total Diplomacy: Strategic Communication as a Primary Weapon of War.” Here’s an excerpt.

“The 9/11 attacks were used to justify an institutional revolution meant to  complete a process of integration and coordination of all the assets of US national
 power through a strategic communication (SC) campaign deployed on a global scale. The ‘Global War on Terror’ (GWOT) nurtured a narrative of crisis associated
 with this unprecedented public education effort. In order to sell its approaches,
 the United States government relied on a network of ‘experts’: military veterans,
 high‐ranking officers such as Admirals as well as professional journalists and academics who contributed to forging a consensus, or, as Michel Foucault would

call it, a ‘regime of truth’ that claims a certain interpretation to be right and true, while ignoring or discrediting critics and dissenting narratives.”

One letter is from Paul Schreyer and is called “Update: Anomalies of the Air Defense on 9/11.” Schreyer writes:

“Miles Kara insists that these were unrelated events. He says there is nothing on the tapes indicating a correlation and he points out that the Langley jets also made no attempt to change their altitude to get closer to the ‘Doomsday plane’ while flying southwest. So it´s possible that Kara is right here. However one still can only wonder about the series of anomalies in connection with the Langley scramble that all had just one effect: delaying the jets´ arrival over Washington.”

The second letter, from me, accompanies the first. It is called “Political Warfare and the 9/11 Commission.”

“When the 9/11 Commission Report was published in July 2004, it provided a completely new explanation for why the U.S. air defenses had failed to intercept any of the four hijacked planes on 9/11. Certain 9/11 Commission staff members had helped to produce that new story, and at least one of them was behind earlier explanations that were contradicted by the new account. That was Miles Kara, a retired U.S. Army intelligence officer. Kara has since been working via his blog and his personal contacts to persuade those questioning the official account that the unanswered questions of 9/11 are often just minor misunderstandings or are simply unimportant.”…”[14]


Seems the 9/11 Commission Report was preplanned, by Anthony Zelikow. Michael Chernoff, was to be enlisted for extraoRdinary attRibutes akin A.I.P.A.C. mannerist-Rapprochements. AND that there was used and available an outline from neo-Con’s precepts to be used, as toten verboten. The GWOT was as remnant-Republic as those PlutocRats would ever allow, I next, surmised. As heinous a cRime that “mot the people of the u.s.a. would have had to start by at least, August 20th and then-some up and until September 11th 2001, I had no doubts that incongruous elements of the black-Ops: ex-Government, agents and US-military-Associates, as well as NSA, as fBIS, as cIAS would want to hook-up to participate. But, that georges-Enron w chaingang-Dickie would edge them along for that paradox-Elementus: egregiousness-Extent. Thus, they were not going to show their “ugliscAPe heads” those anti-Republic, malicious denizens of “lawlessness is akin the teevee shoot-em-ups” always blatancy. Fits like a glove, then that was well planned beforehand, too!


Kleinberg theory of luck 9/11 Commission testimony

7:59 mins.1,891 views–published on youTube 11 Sep 2015, mS Mindy Kleinberg speaks 2003 9/11 Commission testimony (edited) asking commissioners to answer the families’ questions. Video courtesy of Joe Friendly  “[15]


Though you-folks may think, but not feel that I do not find totally-Insouciant, the masse` murder of first-Responders and chaingang-Dickie w georges-Enron, hiding behind curtains of the white Haus, while they continue to assuage total-Innocence in various forms of assiduous deceits, and deceptions, then you are 120% INCORRECT on why I’ve expended space-Time for theirs is not “inconsequencia”. That the black-Ops, were joined by “pys-Ops” could more than conceivably, be consternate approbations as well as appropriate-Deceits. More than a circus; less than a war: psycho-Paradigms on tirade?


“Michael Chertoff, the new head of the Department of Homeland Security, was approved in a 98-0 vote in the U.S. Senate without the question of his Israeli roots – and nationality – even being raised.

On February 15, 2005, Michael Chertoff, an apparent dual national with Israeli roots, was sworn in as the second Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The new “homeland security czar,” who oversees the U.S. Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, seems to be hiding his own dual-national status – with the cooperation of the controlled press.

Although the media scrutinized Bernard Kerik, President George W. Bush’s first choice to head DHS, and uncovered embarrassing details about his mother, there was no discussion of Chertoff’s mother, who played a noteworthy role in the reation of the Zionist state in Palestine.

The omission of Chertoff’s mother’s Zionist past suggests that there is an effort by the media to conceal his ties to Israel and his status as a “de jure” Israeli national, by birth.

Under Israeli law, a child born to an Israeli citizen, including children born outside of Israel as first generation out of Israel, is considered an Israeli citizen. The child remains an Israeli national until he or she formally renounces their Israeli nationality.

Chertoff was born on November 28, 1953 in Elizabeth, New Jersey, to the New York-born Rabbi Gershon Baruch Chertoff and Livia Eisen, the first hostess for El Al, Israel’s state-owned airlines, founded in 1948.”[16]


Michael Chertoff was not the oNLY dual-Citizenship agency and/or admin-Office holder, officials as they are oft-known. As there were 19-reported on that accordance of despicability, unlawful while serving u.s.a. governance. Eric Holder for one. That the georges-Enron admin practice “UN-fair and egregious-Methodology” was that they were Oligarchs as well, who could not disguise being apportioning to plutocracy, our-Nefarious: system. Likewise, double-Dipping also annoyed me as I have been “disabled” since February of 1973. My whole lifestyle has become “part-time and corrugated-Boxes, temporalism, and over-Excessively deducing my thoughts” until I enhanced my philosophical-Overtures. Then, by June 1974, that had helped, as I knew I was on the correct-Paths, and NSDU-238 underscoring had to be an ensemble w each “nuclear-site” protesting. Why then would “dual-citizenship” NOT serve officious: deep-State, deceit for fullest-Deceptionings?


“Zionists are as piously connected to Judaism as neocons are to christianity and al Qaeda is to Islam. A crime is a crime no matter what the collective myth is, be it religious dogma, Santa Claus or flying spaghetti monster that the criminal purportedly subscribes to and should bare no weight in the application of justice. Zionists hail from a political movement created in 1897, and have crafted a very effective shield upon which they hide behind. Remember, most of the known accomplices we have uncovered who facilitated 9/11 and have dropped off our collective radar, who hold the highest level offices of power within our government are not dual passport carrying citizens beholden to say the Vatican, Sweden, Marshall Islands, Palau or the North Pole, but to Israel and they flaunt it proudly – and being mindful of that is not anti-semitic but a constitutionally problematic fact, as they have sworn an oath, but not to the US. The special interest group that Congress, the media and current and past administrations hide behind in abused, but well funded fear like a battered spouse does, and unfortunately this control freak dictates our foreign policy, is not cowering to PeTA, the Pope or Elvis impersonators, but AIPAC as we all know which Paul Craig Roberts wrote of recently: The Israeli Stranglehold


Being an atheist, I have no interest in these man-made constructs and control mechanisms in of themselves, but I do have a problem with these psychopaths and sociopaths who hide behind these religions, playing off of the good nature of most of the innocent flock who do cherish these myths that bring them whatever comfort it may afford them. Beliefs are chains used to hold free minds slaves – no chain of steel ever bound a human being tighter than the chains made of their own beliefs. I have no cherished beliefs in my research surrounding the crimes and criminals who created and benefited from 9/11, but I do know of many facts of what happened and of peoples complicit in those crimes, which over time some of those theories change upon introduction of new information, which any sound person would readily admit to in being incorrect in light of new information, as a new theory becomes the current view until challenged by new unknown information. My views change constantly in light of a dogged question finally being answered, but then that usually introduces ten new questions I have never even thought about, much less have been exposed to or areas of new research within the crimes of humanity I have yet to explore. The person who reaches a point where they think they have it all figured out tends to have it all wrong. Knowing your own darkness is the best method for understanding and dealing with the darkness of others.


Half the world believes that 9/11 was a conspiracy carried out by Zionist extremists with financing from Jewish charities. The other half believes it was a conspiracy carried out by Islamic Muslim extremists with financing from Muslim charities. Who’s right?



Zionists are political extremists who claim that Jews are God’s “chosen race of people” and that they have a God given right to the “promised land” of Israel. There are two categories of modern Jews — the Sephardic Jews and the Ashkenazi Jews. The ancestors of the Ashkenazi Jews were not Jews at all. In fact, they had never even set foot in Israel. They were mint masters, royal treasurers, tax collectors, and money lenders who “converted” to Judaism in the 7th century under Khazaria’s King Bulan for commercial advantage.

The vast majority of modern Jews are “converted” Ashkenazi Jews. Their ancestry can be traced back to Khazaria, an ancient country in Eastern Europe. They ARE NOT Semitic, they have no true genetic or Jewish ethnic identity and they have no inherent entitlement to the land of Israel by right of descent. The word “anti-semitic” is used as a weapon (devised by the Anti-Defamation League) to attack all who oppose or question their fraudulent power and authority. The only true Semitic Jews living in Israel today are Sephardim Jews who are the true descendants of the original twelve tribes of Israel. They are dark skinned with Arab facial features — and they are treated like second class citizens in Israel.

In 1948, the United Nations violated its own charter by dispossessing over four million “Semitic” Palestinians of their homeland called “Palestine”. The UN arbitrarily changed the name of the Palestinian nation of Palestine to “Israel” and recreated it into an Ashkenazi homeland. Since the AshkeNAZIS are not descended from any of the twelve tribes that formed the original Tribes of Israel, they have no ancestral right to the land of Israel granted to them by the UN.”[17]


That the Israels have not had a chance to disregard “religious-Persuasiveness” has been that assiduous-Entreaty by zionists, not to allow them to have that fReedom. There is also “masse` paranoia” which has been accomplished in a dermus of disrespect, and outta respect, not to forget the Holocaust. Okay, but the zionists have been around since 1898, sooo have they made the mostly Ashkenazi, jews. The zionists want control, and they are not that much traditional nor Ashkenazi, in as much as religious-Dogma, since their dogma is “fascist: one-line party of zionism’. Not-sooo-gReat is the lack of support for speaking-Out, all over the space-Time limitations of 3-months after Sept. 11th 2001—by us, we-Boomers, but morosely that majority who are not-so-Bourgeoisie. Where were you? Where are you, now? Butt-holds.


“The U.S. government has used the post-9/11 war on terror to launch two major wars, mount gunship and drone attacks on several countries, and institute a widespread program of torture and abuse. Casualties of those conflicts number in the hundreds of thousands.

Another casualty of the war on terror is civil liberties. From the USA PATRIOT Act, to warrantless surveillance, to the Muslim Ban, to the use of metadata to spy on people and target for drone strikes, the deprivation of constitutional rights has continued during the Bush, Obama and Trump administrations.

An additional assault on the Constitution is the terrorism watchlist, a federal government database of “known or suspected terrorists.” In 2013, there were 680,000 people on the watchlist, called the Terrorist Screening Database (TSDB). By 2017, the number had swelled to 1.2 million, including 4,600 U.S. citizens.

That increase coincided with the Obama administration’s expansion of the terrorism watchlist system in 2013. It established a secret process that didn’t require “concrete facts” or “irrefutable evidence” to designate someone a terrorist, according to The Intercept. The “March 2013 Watchlisting Guidance” states that even uncorroborated Facebook or Twitter posts may be sufficient to include an individual on the watchlist.


Alarming Consequences of Inclusion on the Watchlist

An individual’s listing on the watchlist is provided to many “partners,” including federal, state, and foreign government agencies and officials. Inclusion on the watchlist triggers several consequences, including travel restrictions, law enforcement screening and investigations, immigration and visa decisions, credentialing, and military and intelligence functions.

Partners include Customs and Border Protection, the Coast Guard, Transportation Security Administration, the State Department, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, and Department of Defense. The FBI shares TSDB information with more than 18,000 state, local, city, county, college and university, tribal and federal law enforcement agencies, and 533 private entities. TSDB data is also shared with more than 60 foreign governments.

A federal government agency or foreign government can “nominate” an individual to the TSDB upon a showing of reasonable suspicion, a much lower standard than probable cause. That means a nomination must be based “upon articulable intelligence or information which, based on the totality of the circumstances and, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, creates a reasonable suspicion that the individual is engaged, has been engaged, or intends to engage, in conduct constituting, in preparation for, in aid or in

furtherance of, or related to, terrorism and/ or terrorist activities.”

In deciding whether or not to accept a nomination, the Terrorism Screening Center (TSC) may consider (but cannot solely base its decision on) an individual’s race, ethnicity, religion, or “beliefs and activities protected by the First Amendment, such as freedom of speech, free exercise of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of peaceful assembly, and the freedom to petition the government for redress of grievances.”

The TSC may also use an individual’s associates, travel history, business associations, international associations, financial transactions and study of Arabic to support a nomination.

An individual can be included on the watchlist even with no evidence that the person committed a crime or will commit a crime in the future. People who have been acquitted of a terrorism-related crime can still be listed.

However, earlier this month, U.S. District Court Judge Anthony J. Trenga of the Eastern District of Virginia struck down the TSDB as a violation of due process in Elhady v. Kable.


Harassment Suffered by Plaintiffs

The 23 plaintiffs in the Elhady case, who are represented by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), are U.S. citizens who have not been formally notified by the U.S. government that they are in the TSDB. They have routinely been subjected to additional screening on commercial airplanes when they enter the United States.

While trying to cross the border back into the United States after a short trip to Canada in 2015, plaintiff Anas Elhady was detained for more than 10 hours and repeatedly interrogated about family members and associates. He required emergency medical attention and was taken to a hospital where he was given basic life support.

On prior occasions, Elhady had been detained for seven to eight hours at the border when he attempted to return to the U.S. He was handcuffed, stripped of his belongings, locked in a cell and denied the right to contact his attorney. His phone has been confiscated several times at the U.S. border. Elhady has stopped flying or crossing the border.

Other plaintiffs have been forcibly arrested, often at gunpoint, and detained for many hours in the presence of their families. Plaintiffs’ electronics have been seized, searched and copied. Their travel is “regularly and repeatedly disrupted by long and invasive secondary inspections,” causing them to miss flights and connections “and sometimes to avoid travel altogether.” Some have been denied the right to board flights.

One plaintiff will no longer fly because of “psychological trauma” associated with air travel.”[18]


One onslaught by the oligarchs of Plutocracy, was that I was totally insensed by fellow-BoomeRs, for not helping more on and off my connote to “pRotect WTC buildings in NY city—1989, 1993 and 1996 visits to Manhattan Islamd” because the tyRanny that the plutocracy was continuing to pRoject was sickening. As NSDU-238 usages,lies, decits, no attempt to not suffice needs for retro=Peace in attempting to cleanse the Basra and marsh-Lands of Iraq: phase-One. The war is necessity was injustice, an attempt to make all of us-, american-Socialists, want to puke wherever we went for days, weeks, for months and then suspecting somethinGy-Bop, was yet to befall that tyRanny w a tyRanny-Rex! The police-state was sure to follow, I had discussed to sidewalk-Intelligentsia in Manhattan—amongst new high-rise buildings w cops listening, but not recording at all.


Who in fookeRbiltski-Ville: heck, would do that unless a small but knowledgeable insider and outsider “gRoup”? That much was immediate surmising, by me, while in Cheyenne, awaiting a call back from fBIS on august 20th 200,1 regarding my ‘personally-Knowing’ that Zacarias Moussaoui would not ever be an attempt, but was somebody to covet, altho he was not smart as others. Meaning, Mohammed Atta who I sacred out that apartment building in 1991 from Jacksonville Florida—actually told him to leave and stop bothering these gals w whom he was sooo obsessed to ridicule.


“The Right to International Travel Is a Constitutionally Protected Liberty Interest

“There is no evidence, or contention, that any of these plaintiffs satisfy the definition of a known terrorist,” Judge Trenga wrote.

The judge was disturbed by the possibility that the trauma plaintiffs had suffered at the border — “being surrounded by police, handcuffed in front of their families, and detained for many hours” — could be duplicated by law enforcement inside the country.

Judge Trenga confirmed that the right to international travel is a recognized liberty interest protected by the Fifth Amendment, which forbids the government from depriving an individual of liberty without due process — that is, notice and an opportunity to be heard. The judge found that being included on the TSDB implicates plaintiffs’ strong liberty interests. Inclusion “imposes a substantial burden on the plaintiff’s exercise of their rights to international travel and domestic air travel” resulting in a deprivation of their liberty interests “that requires some measure of due process,” he wrote.

The judge also determined that “the administrative process used to place a person on the TSDB has an inherent, substantial risk of erroneous deprivation and that additional procedures, similar to those made available to individuals on the No Fly List … would reduce the risk of erroneous inclusion in the TSDB and all the resulting consequences.”

Judge Trenga was concerned that the reasonable suspicion standard for inclusion on the TSDB could well mean that “completely innocent conduct” could lead to “a string of subjective, speculative inferences that result in a person’s inclusion.”

He found that the “vagueness of the standard for inclusion in the TSDB” combined “with the lack of any meaningful restraint on what constitutes grounds for placement on the Watchlist, constitutes, in essence, the ‘absence of any ascertainable standard for inclusion and exclusion,’ which violates the Due Process Clause.”

Thus, the judge concluded, “the risk of erroneous deprivation of Plaintiff’s travel-related and reputational liberty interests is high, and the currently existing procedural safeguards are not sufficient to address that risk.”

The judge called the TSDB “a black box” because it does not provide notice of whether an individual was or is still on the TSDB, or the criteria used to make that determination or the evidence utilized. There is no opportunity to rebut the evidence used to include a person on the watchlist. It thus “does not provide to a United States citizen a constitutionally adequate remedy under the Due Process Clause.”[19]


The US-constitution has too been overrun, again and again. Each and every: invasion and illegality to Declaration of Human Rights, while wronging, purposefully, the u.s.a. citizenry always for an immoralist Bourgeoise to perform better under the false and phony guise of “we can substantiate any cause w a false-Flag when necessitated”! Again, I remain sickened that all those ignominious-Disassociateds were for perpetuations of “the false-Record of accord” regarding a heist that brought about masse-Murderers for the new-Rome: masse`-Deceptionings. Fools for hire they were, but we’re yet being “foolish”. Such are the woes of Life, we used to say. However, Alan Reeder and I changed that w several other boomers—almost same age—to the Existentialist, which became “such are the woes of death in an age w.o. ’defense’ meaningfully.


Later, in the struggle to understand Philosophy more broadly, when over 16 years age, Sly Stallone and I tried to decipher a bRoader meaning. I guess I did, because he went on utilizing my Existentialist-Energy to enhance his perceptions upon not wanting to read theatRe of the Absurd, in as much as we, both, were tRying to underscore Surreality. We each scored upon that nature by 1971, our last understood meaningful intellectual acknowledgment.  The Sept 11th 2001, that had taken into NY City was my venturing more deeply into pilgrimages on Existentialist- Surrealism. What happened to the families ever connecting? Did they ever get “closure” or morosely got stuck w pTSD, as well as mired as we-Who: distrust the deep-state and masse` murderings “apparency” like the addendum to cIAS masse` murdering destabilizations-programs. I wondered all that from Sept 12th 2001 thRu to the present, as I made new entrée on factual fecundry and knowledge of portends.


“NEW YORK — For many, 9/11 is characterized by a televised reading of the names of the dead at Ground Zero. But for those looking for answers in what’s left of the World Trade Center rubble, the words on TV are empty promises in a tragedy still unfolding.

Survivors struggle with broken lives and jobs lost due to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Others try to let go of anger: their loved ones ended up in a tumble of broken wreckage in a landfill on Staten Island, left to endure rain, snow and wind. Now the remains sit in a museum, in a private area open only to victims’ family members, not far from where curious tourists buy trinkets at a souvenir shop.

Staffers at the medical examiner’s office still work to identify remains that turned up as recently as 2013. Families of 1,113 of the 2,753 who died still have no biological confirmation of death, according to New York’s Office of the Chief Medical Examiner.


“Someone says to you, ‘Tough it up, kid. Move on. The person died 15 years ago,’“ says Arnold Korotkin, 71, a Montclair, N.J., sociologist and creator of a massive 9/11 listserv. “Forty to 50% of the families didn’t have any body parts returned to them. Only a small percentage had an entire body returned to them. Sometimes, it was just a wedding ring with a finger, or a jawbone with teeth.”

“This isn’t over,” Korotkin adds. “The wound heals and every Sept. 11 the scab gets taken off for a moment.”

Many ongoing issues still swirl around survivors and families. Among them: what role Saudi Arabia may have played in the terror attacks and 28 classified pages of a federal document that some lawmakers say includes a smoking gun; the inclusion of more cancers in insurance coverage for first responders; the treatment of remains.

“I was paranoid,” retired police Sgt. Dennis Frederick said of the years immediately following 9/11 and his ongoing battle with PTSD. “I thought people were trying to injure me, trying to hurt me. I’d have rage attacks. I was like a loaded gun when I was walking around in public. It was a shame. I was a danger to others. I was close to being hospitalized because I was such a danger to myself and others.”

Frederick,  retired from the Port Authority Police Department, already was

struggling with PTSD and working a desk job when a plane struck tower one — the North Tower — of the World Trade Center.


Until that moment, Frederick’s professional life was one traumatic situation after another. He’d worked as a social worker in a children’s shelter, caught war criminals as a member of the U.S. Air Force elite Special Forces Unit, and joined the Port Authority Police Department in 1980, only to see his partner get fatally shot a few months later. He often was the first person at the scene when someone was hit by a train and was one of the first responders in 1993 when terrorists blew up a truck bomb at the World Trade Center, killing six people.

By 2001, he’d reached a point where he was often paranoid, could not always understand reality and drank too much. The department took his weapon and assigned him to desk duty in Jersey City, N.J.

In his autobiographical Kindle book The Hollow Man, which recounts his

experiences on Sept. 11, Frederick, 64, tells of a police officer who has lost his courage. But Frederick, who lives in Little Egg Harbor on the Jersey Shore with his wife, Nancy, wrote that he felt that he returned to his old self when he had to think on his feet that day.


On the morning of Sept. 11, a work colleague told Frederick and his coworkers that a plane hit the North Tower of the World Trade Center. They got in a car and made the quick trip over to lower Manhattan. Frederick, familiar with the complex because of the years he was based there, directed the others. He ran up the steps of Tower One, directing people down the stairs. As the smoke and confusion grew, he heard a thunderous sound and the building shook. He learned that a plane had struck the second tower. He and his colleagues assumed they were about to die.

Frederick carried a heavyset woman struggling with asthma on his back for several flights. Outside, he saw bodies on the ground that looked as if they had exploded. They reminded him of the people he used to see who’d been hit by trains. These were the people who’d jumped to their deaths to avoid being burned alive.

Frederick looked up and saw a huge piece of concrete coming his way. Tower One was coming down. He rolled under a fire truck — the same one that today is in the Sept. 11 museum. While under there, he felt thousands of souls moving through him. He thought he’d died, then realized he had not.

Frederick entered One World Trade Center with seven other officers.

“They were on a different mission,” Frederick said. “They went some place else. I came back down.”

Frederick is the only one of his team who survived.”[20]


The brashness is akin but can be parallel, as though suspended-Animation is an animus in-regard-to non-Delight: disregards. I do not guess. I knew what having to abide by being disabled, or partly not pleased to have less space-Time, than others were doling for themselves and/or family.


<27 Sep 2019>


As I became morosely better informed by my visits to NY-City: 1988, 1989, 1993, 1996, 2003, and when will I return to the streets-Venturings w cameRas and un-Fulfillment contexts on and of D.E.W. connected to Sept. 11th 2001, I have sought all four north-Americas socialist-Parties for deeper contexts, other than Bourgeois: it’s the ecomony-stupid—bully-boy Clyneton, quote. Weld. The perceptions on NSDU-238 brought me into NY-City 1983 as well as those dates below. Foremost was to find other anti-Nuclearists against NSDU-238. But, when Sept 11th happened, and I saw pulverized “dusts” I was camped-out in tRuk-stop: centered on hitch-Rides to/from markets, job center bulletin checks, before what dawned upon me was: there is somethinGy-Bop very remiss and smeall like the new-Rome refreshed the intel-Gence “state”. That was my stat in October 2001. That is my stat, now—27 Sep 2019!


“More than 13 years after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, evidence in a federal lawsuit brought by relatives of the victims is a devastating exposure of events and relations long covered up and obscured by the media and political establishment: that Al Qaeda and the 9/11 hijackers were financed by the Saudi monarchy, a top US ally with extensive ties to US intelligence agencies.

Affidavits filed with Federal District Judge George P. Daniels substantiate claims that leading figures in the Saudi monarchy, including its longtime ambassador to Washington, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, a nephew of the current Saudi monarch, King Salman, financially supported Al Qaeda.

The documents include a deposition from Zacarias Moussaoui, the only individual convicted of direct participation in the plot to hijack airplanes and fly them into the World Trade Center and other US targets on September 11, 2001.

Moussaoui testified that while working for Al Qaeda in Afghanistan in the 1990s he prepared a digital database of the group’s financial backers that included Prince Bandar and two other high-ranking Saudi princes: Prince Turki al-Faisal, the longtime head of Saudi intelligence, and Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, chairman of the Kingdom Holding Company and the wealthiest member of the royal family.

He also described working as a courier for bin Laden, bringing messages to members of the Saudi royal family, including Prince Salman, then the governor of Riyadh, who today is King Salman after succeeding to the throne last month.

The New York Times published lead articles Wednesday and Thursday highlighting the new allegations of Saudi backing for the 9/11 attacks. These had less the character of an exposé, however, than of a semi-official attempt to contain the impact of the material being released as a consequence of the 9/11 families’ lawsuit.

This is the apparent reason for the articles’ near-exclusive focus on Moussaoui, a witness whose testimony can be more easily dismissed by the political establishment. The legal papers filed with the federal district court included Moussaoui’s deposition, but much more, including allegations of Saudi complicity in 9/11 from such pillars of the Washington establishment as former senator Robert Graham of Florida. He wrote, “I am convinced that there was a direct line between at least some of the terrorists who carried out the Sept. 11 attacks and the government of Saudi Arabia.”

Graham is in a position to know. He chaired the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2002 when it produced a lengthy report on the 9/11 attacks. This included a 28-page section on Saudi support to the 9/11 hijackers that was classified and suppressed by the Bush administration, an act of censorship that was endorsed and continued by the Obama administration. Senator Graham, who favors the release of this material, wrote, “The 28 pages primarily relate to who financed 9/11, and they point a very strong finger at Saudi Arabia as being the principal financier.”

The evidence of Saudi complicity in the 9/11 attacks is a devastating exposure of the fraudulent nature of the “war on terror,” the axis of US national security policy for more than 13 years.

The Bush administration used the 9/11 attacks as the pretext for wars against Afghanistan, whose government had provided shelter to Osama bin Laden, but had no involvement in 9/11, and against Iraq, which had no connection to either 9/11 or Al Qaeda. Meanwhile Saudi Arabia, the country that supplied Al Qaeda’s funds, its principal leader, and 15 of the 19 hijackers, was deemed a key US ally.

Every official investigation into the 9/11 attacks had to whitewash the Saudi connection—or be censored, like the Senate Intelligence Committee report. The issue was not just the reactionary role of the Saudi monarchy in financing and supporting Al Qaeda, but the close ties between US intelligence agencies and the supposedly anti-American terrorist group—connections on which the latest Times articles are completely silent.

There is every reason to believe that nearly 3,000 Americans were murdered on September 11, 2001 with the tacit or active complicity of sections of the US military-intelligence apparatus. The CIA, FBI and other agencies took no action to disrupt the operations of the terrorists, even though many of the individuals involved were known to US security agencies and several were under active surveillance as they planned and executed the simultaneous hijacking of four US jetliners.

Many questions about the complicity of US agencies with the 9/11 attacks were raised within weeks of the destruction of the World Trade Center. Some were detailed in a series of articles on the World Socialist Web Site just over 13 years ago: see “Was the US government alerted to September 11 attack?”

Thirteen years later, these questions are still unanswered:

* Why were the 9/11 hijackers allowed to travel in and out of the United States freely, even those like Mohammed Atta, who were under surveillance for Al Qaeda connections?

* Why did the CIA fail to inform the FBI of the entry of two Al Qaeda associates into the United States in early 2001? These two lived in San Diego at the home of an FBI informant, sought pilot training, and received funds from Saudi sponsors in Washington. One was listed in the phone book. On September 11, 2001, they were 2 of the 19 hijackers.

* Why were the future hijackers allowed to take flight training, including Moussaoui, who asked to learn how to steer a jumbo jet but not how to take off and land? When Minnesota FBI agents sought to probe Moussaoui’s actions and motives, a month before the 9/11 attacks, FBI headquarters denied requests to search his computer.

* Why was no effort made to respond to repeated warnings from foreign intelligence services, including Russia, Israel, and Germany, about terrorist plans to hijack US airliners and fly them into buildings?

The crimes committed on 9/11 took nearly 3,000 lives. The crimes committed using 9/11 as a justification have taken hundreds of thousands if not millions of lives, in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria, Libya and a dozen other countries. And 9/11 has served as the all-purpose justification for the wholesale destruction of democratic rights in the United States and other imperialist countries, which have created the framework for police states in the name of preventing “another 9/11.”

Covering up the Saudi connection is critical not only in concealing the role of US intelligence agencies in the events of September 11, 2001, but also to ongoing operations of US imperialism throughout the Middle East, where Washington relies on the reactionary Saudi monarchy as one of its main agencies. This was signaled last month in Obama’s trip to Riyadh to pay homage to the new king, Salman—one of those named as a financial supporter of Osama bin Laden.”[21]


Did I meet Osama bin Ladin once? Yes, on Telegraph Avenue in 1977 as he had 4-body-Guards w him i.e.knives not AK-47’s. Did he and his 12-storng male ecscourts in the desrt of Afghnaistan in 1981, wave to me to come closer, to be co-erced for illicit fund and gambling w sojounrs of internatipnal-Purport. Yes, did he speak to me either? No. Was I glad not to be outnumbered, altho I was world renown as peace-Diplomat, an admonished publicl,y that nuclear-Weapons were two-types and “not-peace-Gestures, altho forthrightly necessity for diplomacy toward, world-Peace? Yes.

What I relish that relates to September 11th u.s.a. debacle, is: a) that D.E.W. was used  and as yet we have not configured how to use Phytoremediation at nevada-Testsite, nor inside the Dai-ichis, nor at semplatinsk-60. Secondly, there has been one-Arrest “Khalid Sheik Mohammed, and that Osama bin Ladin stressed he was not the one-sole endeavoring but that many would, because al Qaeda a US-military hoax. In other words, nobody-Else has been arrested. In other words insider-tRAding was guarantee that Mossad, ex-Personnel, was involved w the Bush crime-Family, the fBIS not being reluctant to become coerces, as well as cIAS cannot be tRusted at home to be any less than diabolical! As well as, diabolical that the 9-11 Commission Report was a 444 days delayed for covetous on cover-up not to be discussed, too!


“Prime suspect in the New York and Washington terrorists attacks, branded by the FBI as an “international terrorist” for his role in the African US embassy bombings, Saudi born Osama bin Laden was recruited during the Soviet-Afghan war “ironically under the auspices of the CIA, to fight Soviet invaders”. [1]

In 1979 “the largest covert operation in the history of the CIA” was launched in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in support of the pro-Communist government of Babrak Kamal. [2]:

With the active encouragement of the CIA and Pakistan’s ISI [Inter Services Intelligence], who wanted to turn the Afghan jihad into a global war waged by all Muslim states against the Soviet Union, some 35,000 Muslim radicals from 40 Islamic countries joined Afghanistan’s fight between 1982 and 1992. Tens of thousands more came to study in Pakistani madrasahs. Eventually more than 100,000 foreign Muslim radicals were directly influenced by the Afghan jihad.[3]

The Islamic “jihad” was supported by the United States and Saudi Arabia with a significant part of the funding generated from the Golden Crescent drug trade:

In March 1985, President Reagan signed National Security Decision Directive 166,…[which] authorize[d] stepped-up covert military aid to the mujahideen, and it made clear that the secret Afghan war had a new goal: to defeat Soviet troops in Afghanistan through covert action and encourage a Soviet withdrawal. The new covert U.S. assistance began with a dramatic increase in arms supplies — a steady rise to 65,000 tons annually by 1987, … as well as a “ceaseless stream” of CIA and Pentagon specialists who traveled to the secret headquarters of Pakistan’s ISI on the main road near Rawalpindi, Pakistan. There the CIA specialists met with Pakistani intelligence officers to help plan operations for the Afghan rebels.[4]

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) using Pakistan’s military Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) played a key role in training the Mujahideen. In turn, the CIA sponsored guerrilla training was integrated with the teachings of Islam:

Predominant themes were that Islam was a complete socio-political ideology, that holy Islam was being violated by the atheistic Soviet troops, and that the Islamic people of Afghanistan should reassert their independence by overthrowing the leftist Afghan regime propped up by Moscow.[5]


Pakistan’s Intelligence Apparatus

Pakistan’s ISI was used as a “go-between”. The CIA covert support to the “jihad” operated indirectly through the Pakistani ISI, –i.e. the CIA did not channel its support directly to the Mujahideen. In other words, for these covert operations to be “successful”, Washington was careful not to reveal the ultimate objective of the “jihad”, which consisted in destroying the Soviet Union.

In the words of CIA’s Milton Beardman “We didn’t train Arabs”. Yet according to Abdel Monam Saidali, of the Al-aram Center for Strategic Studies in Cairo, bin Laden and the “Afghan Arabs” had been imparted “with very sophisticated types of training that was allowed to them by the CIA” [6]

CIA’s Beardman confirmed, in this regard, that Osama bin Laden was not aware of the role he was playing on behalf of Washington. In the words of bin Laden (quoted by Beardman): “neither I, nor my brothers saw evidence of American help”. [7]

Motivated by nationalism and religious fervor, the Islamic warriors were unaware that they were fighting the Soviet Army on behalf of Uncle Sam. While there were contacts at the upper levels of the intelligence hierarchy, Islamic rebel leaders in [war] theatre had no contacts with Washington or the CIA.

With CIA backing and the funneling of massive amounts of US military aid, the Pakistani ISI had developed into a “parallel structure wielding enormous power over all aspects of government”. [8] The ISI had a staff composed of military and intelligence officers, bureaucrats, undercover agents and informers, estimated at 150,000. [9]

Meanwhile, CIA operations had also reinforced the Pakistani military regime led by General Zia Ul Haq:

‘Relations between the CIA and the ISI [Pakistan’s military intelligence] had grown increasingly warm following [General] Zia’s ouster of Bhutto and the advent of the military regime,’… During most of the Afghan war, Pakistan was more aggressively anti-Soviet than even the United States. Soon after the Soviet military invaded Afghanistan in 1980, Zia [ul Haq] sent his ISI chief to destabilize the Soviet Central Asian states. The CIA only agreed to this plan in October 1984…. `the CIA was more cautious than the Pakistanis.’ Both Pakistan and the United States took the line of deception on Afghanistan with a public posture of negotiating a settlement while privately agreeing that military escalation was the best course.[10]


The Golden Crescent Drug Triangle

The history of the drug trade in Central Asia is intimately related to the CIA’s covert operations. Prior to the Soviet-Afghan war, opium production in Afghanistan and Pakistan was directed to small regional markets. There was no local production of heroin. [11] In this regard, Alfred McCoy’s study confirms that within two years of the onslaught of the CIA operation in Afghanistan, “the Pakistan-Afghanistan borderlands became the world’s top heroin producer, supplying 60 percent of U.S. demand. In Pakistan, the heroin-addict population went from near zero in 1979… to 1.2 million by 1985 — a much steeper rise than in any other nation”:[12]

CIA assets again controlled this heroin trade. As the Mujahideen guerrillas seized territory inside Afghanistan, they ordered peasants to plant opium as a revolutionary tax. Across the border in Pakistan, Afghan leaders and local syndicates under the protection of Pakistan Intelligence operated hundreds of heroin laboratories. During this decade of wide-open drug-dealing, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency in Islamabad failed to instigate major seizures or arrests … U.S. officials had refused to investigate charges of heroin dealing by its Afghan allies `because U.S. narcotics policy in Afghanistan has been subordinated to the war against Soviet influence there.’ In 1995, the former CIA director of the Afghan operation, Charles Cogan, admitted the CIA had indeed sacrificed the drug war to fight the Cold War. `Our main mission was to do as much damage as possible to the Soviets. We didn’t really have the resources or the time to devote to an investigation of the drug trade,’… `I don’t think that we need to apologize for this. Every situation has its fallout…. There was fallout in terms of drugs, yes. But the main objective was accomplished. The Soviets left Afghanistan.'[13]

In the Wake of the Cold War

In the wake of the Cold War, the Central Asian region is not only strategic for its extensive oil reserves, it also produces three quarters of the World’s opium representing multibillion dollar revenues to business syndicates, financial institutions, intelligence agencies and organized crime. The annual proceeds of the Golden Crescent drug trade (between 100 and 200 billion dollars) represents approximately one third of the Worldwide annual turnover of narcotics, estimated by the United Nations to be of the order of $500 billion.[14] [22]


The one factorable that I heard publicly, the most, and quite outstanding when all facts relatable constantly infused newer correlatives that also become :known-Facts” as there was no “constant” since that had to have been factored firsthand, but before the dstard and stupendously-Lame-o’d act of and by 4-aerojets merely hijacked “simultaneously” and no air-Force doomed by hypocrisy. Weld, now, this was quite a program for teevee-Vieworship, was that not! Against others best but shallower participation in utilizing defense wherever I went in NY-city and into bRookhaven National Laboratory mega-site. 100,000s others did not, because I would have met at least another 100 more, but merely had to struggle w back-tRacking all my d-Day long. That fact is “surreptition” happened, had been the one sole, subjective-Condolence, the factorable contumacious, idiosyncratic, maybe pseudocRatic, too! This, the latter to “won’t bring we-People closer” to this habitue of odious, strait-Jacketed, hype on paranoia, was theirs.  Surreptition.


[1] “NEVER FORGET: What Really Happened on 9/11: Who was Responsible and Why” 29 Aug 2019 James Fetzer

[2] “The molecular process of World Revolution” In Defence of Marxism 11 July 2005

[3] “Why I Don’t Speak of the Fake News of ‘9/11’ Anymore” 28 Sep 2018 James Fetzer, expaiming Edward Curtin 12 Sep 2018

[4] “Robert Mueller helped Saudi Arabia cover up its role in 9/11 attacks: suit” by Paul Sperry -September 10, 2019

[5] “9/11 18 Years Later” by Paul Craig Roberts -September 9, 2019

[6] “Directed Energy Weapons: Counter Directed Energy Weapons and High Energy Lasers”

[7] “9/11 Whistleblowers: Michael Springmann” corbett report 25:27 mins. 14,177 views Published on Sep 9, 2019

[8] “9/11 Whistleblowers—Kevin Ryan” James Corbett 09/06/2019

[9] “Who Is Osama Bin Laden?” by Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, September 08, 2019 and

Global Research 12 September 2001

[10] “9/11, Drug Money, Oil Resources and the Invasion of Afghanistan: Michael Ruppert Refutes the Official 9/11 Story” the March 2002 Roundtable, Featuring Mike Ruppert. Conversation on Canadian TV, by Michael Welch and Michael Ruppert Global Research, September 05, 2019


Sept. 11, 2019

[12] “Radiation effects of depleted uranium continue to bring disease and death in Iraq” April 11, 2016 Posted by Christina MacPherson,

[13] “9/11: A Day that Changed the World” by César Chelala -10 Sept 2019

[14] “Recent Material at Journal for 9/11 Studies” by Staff -27 Aug 2013 by Kevin Ryan

[15] As an artiste`, Philosopher, wRitor, blogger, photographer, Ecologist, former-OTR-tRukkoR, I have expended too much time, allotting my space-Time to summarizing, and not making a PhD thesis on “the plutocratic new-Rome”…please visit: www.nukiemole/org and d0t c0m

[16] “Controlled Press Hides–Chertoff’s Israeli Roots” by Christopher Bollyn 04 Mar 2005

[17] “Who are the Ashkenazis: The Media Trend of Omitting Motive for 1993 & 9/11 Attacks” fRom: 9-11 Inside Job World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 & 7 Fell on Footprint in Free Fall Time (as if with no resistance) Impossible Without Explosives

[18] “Post-9/11 Terrorism Watchlist of More Than 1 Million Judged Unconstitutional” by Prof. Marjorie Cohn,

Global Research, 14 Sep 2019 Truthout

[19] “9/11: A Day that Changed the World” One of the lessons to be drawn from that tragedy is that violence begets violence and intolerance breeds intolerance… by César Chelala -10 Sep 2019

[20] “More than a Thousand Families Have No Confirmation of Death” by Staff –September 11, 2016

[21] “Saudi Arabia, 9/11 and the ‘war on terror’..” WSWS by Patrick Martin 6 February 2015

[22] “Who Is Osama Bin Laden?” by Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 08 Sep 2019, Global Research 12 September 2001

Bio-sketch (2-27-16)…

I started into believing that I would be able to show my data and my photogRapHics in 1996. By 1998 I was learning computers would gain ascendant methods thru technics of programming for a future connected to data and information. That was nuclear-Molecular finding(s) to share and my personal-Activism w first account specifics and engendering(s).

As cameras went 'digital-Tech' I fond that editing was also to follow in 2004. Then, in 2005 my first digital camera had replaced usage(s) of s.l.r. 35 mm's. I have no mercy nor pity for the thieves who have stolen my hard werk, as anxiety of what I allowed was mid-stReam--anyway! Those asshole-Pukes have cost me $1,000's on a fixed income and I remain single, sole-Survivor of two-Families w.o. offspring!

This Post Has 0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

3 × two =

Back To Top
×Close search