Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /home/oklxatm4xwt3/public_html/wp-content/plugins/revslider/includes/operations.class.php on line 2254

Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /home/oklxatm4xwt3/public_html/wp-content/plugins/revslider/includes/operations.class.php on line 2258

Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /home/oklxatm4xwt3/public_html/wp-content/plugins/revslider/includes/output.class.php on line 2941

Deprecated: Function create_function() is deprecated in /home/oklxatm4xwt3/public_html/wp-content/plugins/revslider/includes/framework/functions-wordpress.class.php on line 257
nUkiEmOLe iNf0 #7/ 02 Nov 2016: NSDU-238 the bloated nuclear weapons budget or Falsity – nuclear-Molecular is nUkiEmOLe dot oRg
arraddison@nukiemole.com

nUkiEmOLe iNf0 #7/ 02 Nov 2016: NSDU-238 the bloated nuclear weapons budget or Falsity

nUkiEmOLe iNfO #7/ 02 Nov 2016

NSDU-238 the bloated nuclear weapons budget or Falsity

 

[1]The bloated nuclear weapons budget also impacts negatively on the international community. The annual UN Core Budget, for example, is only 5.1 billion USD – or 5% of the annual global nuclear weapons budget. Overseas development aid from the nuclear-armed States to the developing countries remains way under the agreed target of 0.7% of GDP, a target which could easily be reached if the funding for nuclear weapons was re-directed towards development aid. Civil society actors, working with legislators, can impact on budget decisions relating to nuclear weapons, and reverse this trend.

 

Most of the nuclear weapons money [italics mine] goes to private companies which are awarded contracts to manufacture, modernize and maintain nuclear weapons and their delivery vehicles. For these companies, the bloated budgets are in their interests. Indeed, the companies actively lobby their parliaments and governments to continue allocating the funds to nuclear weapons. And they support think tanks and other public initiatives to promote the ‘need’ for nuclear weapons maintenance, modernization or expansion.

 

 A recent report Don’t Bank on the Bomb identifies 26 major nuclear weapons producers, and more than 382 banks, insurance companies, pension funds and asset managers from 27 countries that invest significantly in these corporations, all of which have a vested interest in high nuclear weapons budgets.

 

US President Eisenhower warned 60 years ago of the possibility of a military-industrial complex being established – a formidable union of armed forces and defence contractors using their power to move governments and parliaments to maintain high military budgets. This has arguably come true – especially in relation to nuclear weapons. 1 Introduction 2 Nuclear weapons budget: opportunity cost “Over 16,000 nuclear weapons remain in the world’s arsenals costing $100 billion annually – funds that could instead be used to reverse climate change, eliminate poverty and address other social and economic needs.” A Nuclear-Weapon-Free World: Our Common Good. Joint statement of legislators and religious leaders organised by Mayors for Peace, Religions for Peace and Parliamentarians for Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament.

 

Those pursuing nuclear disarmament therefore need to find ways of countering this power. Anti-nuclear activists and other civil society leaders need to join forces with progressive legislators, non-nuclear governments and allies within the governments of nuclear-armed states in order to reduce the lobbying power of the nuclear weapons corporations, and move the money from nuclear weapons budgets to fund social, economic and environmental programs instead.”

 

 

[1] “Move the nuclear weapons money– A Handbook for Civil Society and Legislators “ by IPB, PNND & WFC http://www.ipb.org/uploads/documents/other_docs/pnnd-handbook.pdf     apeco filed 11-02-16

 

"R" Addison

I started into believing that I would be able to show my data and my photogRapHics in 1996. By 1998 I was learning computers would gain ascendant methods thru technics of programming for a future connected to data and information. That was nuclear-Molecular finding(s) to share and my personal-Activism w first account specifics and engendering(s).

As cameras went 'digital-Tech' I fond that editing was also to follow in 2004. Then, in 2005 my first digital camera had replaced usage(s) of s.l.r. 35 mm's. I have no mercy nor pity for the thieves who have stolen my hard werk, as anxiety of what I allowed was mid-stReam--anyway! Those asshole-Pukes have cost me $1,000's on a fixed income and I remain single, sole-Survivor of two-Families w.o. offspring!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *