Ecosocialism #24/ 16 Aug 2018
Oligarchs-of-Plutocracy shadow-Government Mechanism
In u.s.a.’s plutocracy, the form of governance we have had, since 1947, there is not much chance to advance nor stray from wars-Warring auspices of oppression. I had warned myself of that being astigmatic, associated w not making incorrect decisions, while I was a sophomore @ San Mateo High School. I practiced “disassociation, and formula’s of decision-Making practices” from baseball fields, like Seals Stadium, to Candle-stink Park (baseball’s Giants stadium). I started four-year college in Colorado Springs where I might look at Pikes Peak in-between surgeries from evil-Sport, football. I had one intelligentsia associate, who gave me some not-so-staid advice, as well as a super-Sophomore who took 2-3 hours to point my dis-association from not allotments enough for rationale and logic.. I wandered into 2-hours extra-Reading of Philosophy, not classical but modern and George Santayana, Jean Paul Sartre, J. Glen Grey, and Alan Watts—both of whom, the latter, I met and under-studied. There awakened in me, a long stretch of creating articulateness for Ecology and Philosophy, as I enrolled to U.C. Berkeley, and started gRad-studies in1966 i.e. between sophomore and junior liberal-Arts college. “R”
“I come and stand at every door
But none can hear my silent tread
I knock and yet remain unseen
For I am dead for I am dead
I’m only seven though I died
In Hiroshima long ago
I’m seven now as I was then
When children die they do not grow
My hair was scorched by swirling flame
My eyes grew dim my eyes grew blind
Death came and turned my bones to dust
And that was scattered by the wind
I need no fruit I need no rice
I need no sweets nor even bread
I ask for nothing for myself
For I am dead for I am dead
All that I need is that for peace
You fight today you fight today
So that the children of this world
Can live and grow and laugh and play”
A poem written by poet in memoriam “The Lies and Crimes of Hiroshima” Circa 8-06-18
When you’re going to be an imperialist-Empire why not kill millions upon millions of we-people and pollute all water-Sources to maintain egomania My fidelus onward Radio-nuclides aR not-good-foR-Us, continuing into a 66th year. The multi-Nafarity of the rogue-empire not is a good giveaway “malady-Word” but pseudocratic does not best describe how Oligarchs are. We not oligarchs, technocrats, plutocrats do not need a nation that is interests of Democracy here and there, when we’re yet being obviating and obfuscated from having intricacies w.o. moronism of ”war-Dept” as out misinformation and misguiding-Light! One of my biggest thRills was making “decisions” but how that intricacy was done has been lost to my “journals” that was partitioned into my office at Oro-bar studio in Oroville CA. I’d like those and 20,000 coloR-slides returned to me. A stipend may be set-up, altho my numerous acquaintancing, the fact does not need be cause of further burglaRies —here in thieving-Central WY. “R”
“BPA stands for bisphenol A. BPA is an industrial chemical that has been used to make certain plastics and resins since the 1960s.
BPA is found in polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. Polycarbonate plastics are often used in containers that store food and beverages, such as water bottles. They may also be used in other consumer goods.
Epoxy resins are used to coat the inside of metal products, such as food cans, bottle tops and water supply lines. Some dental sealants and composites also may contain BPA.
Some research has shown that BPA can seep into food or beverages from containers that are made with BPA. Exposure to BPA is a concern because of possible health effects of BPA on the brain, behavior and prostate gland of fetuses, infants and children. Additional research suggests a possible link between BPA and increased blood pressure.
However, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has said that BPA is safe at the very low levels that occur in some foods. This assessment is based on review of hundreds of studies.
The FDA is continuing its review of BPA, including supporting ongoing research. In the meantime, if you’re concerned about BPA, you can take these steps to reduce your exposure:
Use BPA-free products. Manufacturers are creating more and more BPA-free products. Look for products labeled as BPA-free. If a product isn’t labeled, keep in mind that some, but not all, plastics marked with recycle codes 3 or 7 may be made with BPA.
Cut back on cans. Reduce your use of canned foods since most cans are lined with BPA-containing resin.
Avoid heat. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health, advises against microwaving polycarbonate plastics or putting them in the dishwasher, because the plastic may break down over time and allow BPA to leach into foods.
Use alternatives. Use glass, porcelain or stainless steel containers for hot foods and liquids instead of plastic containers.”[i]
As far as this-One can discern, BPA is a partiality about production-Lines of 1,000’s types of “plastics and heat” temperances. Plastispheres most likely is not comprised of BPA. As w food “all-Consistencies” must be considered and researched to the gReat extent. Otherwise, what would artificial-Intel be useful?. Plastispheres molecularism, has now added to that dimension. The dementia, however, is far from over, because the overt-Encapsulation has become covert sublimations of big-Factory? No. How about coRpoRate crime? What is non-Insular has been the ethical-Imbalances, that which remains a usury on the Irresolute. The molecularist-Extent has been overtaken by Bourgeoisie and a lacking americanism, but especially by coRpoRate one-Personhood, cRedo-of-gReed plutocracy at-the-helm of fascist-Banking and control by that method of technocRats ‘n Oligarchs. Certainly ‘democracy is speaking-Out’ but while wArs-Warring have dRained the US-tReasury where have the people-Gone w knowledge and w know-how in cowering infrequency? “R”
“In Russia today we can clearly see an Oligarchy, represented at their head by Putin. They are an entrenched ruling class that have evolved from the nomenkla-tura, or Communist bureaucrats, of the Soviet Union. Following the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the USSR, Western business had hoped to enter Russia to steal and plunder her resources. However, they found that the Russians had already organised themselves into an Oligarchy capable of plundering their own nation’s wealth. The same process can be identified in China where previous state-owned enterprises, under the guiding hand of the old Communist ruling class, are transfer-red into the ownership of the new post-Communist ruling class. Who just happen to be the same people!
In ancient China Confucius stood up against Oligarchy. One of the main problems China faced in his time was the constant warfare driven by the private needs of the Chou dynasty. Confucius regarded many of the nobility as useless parasites and idlers. He promoted the ideas of education on the basis of ability and a government filled with advisers (to the leader) who served not feudal loyalty but answered to higher moral principles. Confucius stood in opposition to entrenched privilege, which Oligarchy maintains, and was opposed to the domination by a caste of rulers with no intrinsic merits of their own.
Machiavelli, who lived in Italy during the Renaissance period, wrote about the body politic. Drawing on his country’s history he wrote about the nobility living as he saw it on the abundant revenue derived from their estates, and called them pests in his Discourse on Livy. He was of the opinion though that class conflict bet-ween the rich few and the many have-nots was a good thing for political development. He identified five classes: feudal nobility; bankers and merchants; the middle class; poor urban mass; and the country peasant. The key was that one group’s power did not become excessive. Machiavelli believed that a healthy republic required a series of checks and balances.
The idea of a series of checks and balances was enshrined at the heart of the US Constitution. The American Founding Fathers were concerned with preventing Tyranny, but they were also aware of the dangers of Oligarchy. They attempted to form safeguards in the Constitution to prevent the US from falling prey to this type of rule. It can be summed up in the slogan, “Of the People, By the People, and For the People.” Have the Oligarchs now taken over the United States? More com-mentators, like Thomas Piketty in his book Capital in the Twenty First Century that have focused on the widening inequality gap, are drawing this conclusion. The US is being run by Oligarchs.”
What are major effects of chemicals in chem-Trails our above-Heads, oxygenate-Disseminations? What we-Ecologists are really saying is cut the hype and discard the propaganda-Chatter! Do the Oligarchs care about “anyone at all” is the rottenest question, since that is none of their-Concern. That means beings-of-Plutocracy make the import of laws un-Available.
“What caused the fire in Yellowstone in 1988?
9 fires caused by humans; 42 caused by lightning. Fires begun outside of the park burned 63 percent or approximately 500,000 acres of the total acreage. In Yellow-stone National Park itself, the fires affected—but did not “devastate”—793,880 acres or 36 percent of total park acreage.Jun 14, 1988
The Yellowstone Fires of 1988 – National Park Service
Search for: What caused the fire in Yellowstone in 1988?
How many acres were burned in the Yellowstone fire?
In all, 1.2 million acres burned in the greater Yellowstone area, including 793,000 acres of the park’s 2,221,800 total.Jun 1, 2015
The Great Fires of Yellowstone – My Yellowstone Park
The gRizzlies important is having a mixture seems to be upmost, and helps to regu-late that the climate of high-country where the Yellowstone Caldera, is important to be rid the August onslaughts of many types of insectavore, also affirms the eco-Logic. assumes major-Factor of Ecology. That cutworm moths, are consumed by the gRizz, is that they do mix into small geographic-Confines, same as McNeill River eating and gorging upon “salmon”. That elevation is all above 8,600 feet. The fatten-up season is pRimary to these bRuins. They can and do get to 1,050 pounds, as I know from my time w Timothy tReadwell, in Alaska, and at three other sites where the eye-site is around 100-feet but nose-Foretelling “you” can be 3-4-5 miles. “R”
“How many calories does a grizzly bear eat in one day?
While fat in the diet is not the best thing for humans, it is important to bears. A single moth has a high enough fat content that it accounts for as much as a half a calorie. That means that 20,000 calories of just moths per day can be consumed by a rock-turning grizzly bear .Jun 21, 2011
Yellowstone Bears Eat 40,000 Moths a Day In August – My …
Search for: How many calories does a grizzly bear eat in one day?
How much food do grizzly bears eat a day?
They may intake 40 kg (90 lbs.) of food each day, gaining over 1 kg (2.2 lbs.) of body weight a day. As omnivores, grizzlies will eat anything nutritious they can find, gorging on nuts, fruit, leaves, roots, fungi, insects, and a variety of animals including salmon and other fish, rodents, sheep, and elk.
Grizzly Bear Facts | Grizzlies Information – Animal Fact Guide
Search for: How much food do grizzly bears eat a day?”[ii]
Black bears also gorge in summer and into Fall, in the Rockies from Mejico, thRu u.s.a.-Rockies into Rockies British Columbia onto Alaska. The largest bRown Bears are Kodiaks, of and on Islands surrounding Kodiak Island. The gRizzly is a bRown bear and I’ve had 3X 950-pounds to 1,050 pounds bears, each nap w.i. 5-to-20 feet of the tent I shared w tReadwell. One almost wants to reach-out and pet their burly-fir, is highly, not-Recommended—as well as looking them directly in the eyes. I started w the two scientist-bRothers” the cRaigheads, in Yellowstone, under auspice of Prof. Sam tRull in Yellowstone park, 1969. My annual donations to Buffalo Field Campaign, need be made as I hope to regRoup my writings and “slides and negatives/prints”. firstname.lastname@example.org
““Last week, mainstream media outlets gave minimal attention to the news that the U.S. Naval station in Virginia Beach had spilled an estimated 94,000 gallons of jet fuel into a nearby waterway, less than a mile from the Atlantic Ocean.
While the incident was by no means as catastrophic as some other pipeline spills, it underscores an important yet little-known fact—that the U.S. Department of Defense is both the nation’s and the world’s, largest polluter.
Producing more hazardous waste than the five largest U.S. chemical companies combined, the U.S. Department of Defense has left its toxic legacy throughout the world in the form of depleted uranium, oil, jet fuel, pesticides, defoliants like Agent Orange and lead, among others.
In 2014, the former head of the Pentagon’s environmental program told News-week that her office has to contend with 39,000 contaminated areas spread across 19 million acres just in the U.S. alone.
U.S. military bases, both domestic and foreign, consistently rank among some of the most polluted places in the world, as perchlorate and other components of jet and rocket fuel contaminate sources of drinking water, aquifers and soil. Hundreds of military bases can be found on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) list of Superfund sites, which qualify for clean-up grants from the government.
Almost 900 of the nearly 1,200 Superfund sites in the U.S. are abandoned military facilities or sites that otherwise support military needs, not counting the military bases themselves.
“Almost every military site in this country is seriously contaminated,” John D. Dingell, a retired Michigan congressman and war veteran, told Newsweek in 2014. Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, North Carolina is one such base. Lejeune’s contami-nation became widespread and even deadly after its groundwater was polluted with a sizable amount of carcinogens from 1953 to 1987.
However, it was not until this February that the government allowed those ex-posed to chemicals at Lejeune to make official compensation claims. Numerous bases abroad have also contaminated local drinking water supplies, most famously the Kadena Air Force Base in Okinawa.
Between 1946 and 1958, the U.S. tested 66 nuclear weapons near Bikini atoll. Populations living nearby in the Marshall Islands were exposed to measurable lev-els of radioactive fallout from these tests. National Cancer Institute
In addition, the U.S., which has conducted more nuclear weapons tests than all other nations combined, is also responsible for the massive amount of radiation that continues to contaminate many islands in the Pacific Ocean. The Marshall Is-lands, where the U.S. dropped more than sixty nuclear weapons between 1946 and 1958, are a particularly notable example. Inhabitants of the Marshall Islands and nearby Guam continue to experience an exceedingly high rate of cancer.
The American Southwest was also the site of numerous nuclear weapons tests that contaminated large swaths of land. Navajo Indian reservations have been poll-uted by long-abandoned uranium mines where nuclear material was obtained by U.S. military contractors.
One of the most recent testaments to the U.S. military’s horrendous environ-mental record is Iraq. U.S. military action there has resulted in the desertification of 90 percent of Iraqi territory, crippling the country’s agricultural industry and forcing it to import more than 80 percent of its food. The U.S.’ use of depleted uranium in Iraq during the Gulf War also caused a massive environmental burden for Iraqis. In addition, the U.S. military’s policy of using open-air burn pits to dispose of waste from the 2003 invasion has caused a surge in cancer among U.S. servicemen and Iraqi civilians alike.
While the U.S. military’s past environmental record suggests that its current policies are not sustainable, this has by no means dissuaded the U.S. military from openly planning future contamination of the environment through misguided waste disposal efforts. Last November, the U.S. Navy announced its plan to release 20,000 tons of environmental “stressors,” including heavy metals and explosives, into the coastal waters of the U.S. Pacific Northwest over the course of this year.
The plan, laid out in the Navy’s Northwest Training and Testing Environmental Impact Statement, fails to mention that these “stressors” are described by the EPA as known hazards, many of which are highly toxic at both acute and chronic levels.
The 20,000 tons of “stressors” mentioned in the Environmental Impact Statement do not account for the additional 4.7 to 14 tons of “metals with potential toxicity” that the Navy plans to release annually, from now on, into inland waters along the Puget Sound in Washington state.
In response to concerns about these plans, a Navy spokeswoman said that hea-vy metals and even depleted uranium are no more dangerous than any other metal, a statement that represents a clear rejection of scientific fact. It seems that the very U.S. military operations meant to “keep Americans safe” come at a higher cost than most people realize—a cost that will be felt for generations to come both within the U.S. and abroad.
Reposted with permission from our media associate MintPress News.”[iii]
The major concerns are all “Radionuclides-pRoblems” of contact and of de-Contaminations not yet involving “phytoRemediations”. The 24/7 alert system needs to be de-alerted, and the space-Nuclear: theRmos and “directed-energy” weapons need to be de-Armed, as there is oNLY one ozone-Protective: shield. The bigger problems of NPP’s UN-pRotected fRom NSDU-238 attacks; the MIRV’d 20-missles per ‘nucleaR-submaRine’; the silos on 24/7 alert gobbling roadways in the once-Waz: buffalope-Plains; the lackadaiscal efforts by US-congress to “de-Contaminate” the whole of Newe Segobia lands (or even start) of the Nevada Plateau—known as that has always belonged to those tRibes; the time that takes to de-Commission one waRhead. Test Site contains approximately 864,000 acres of indgenous-Takeover w.o. many remediations, especially where phytoremediations ought have been enforced since 1947. “R”
“The Great Basin is the largest area of contiguous endorheic watersheds in North America. It spans nearly all of Nevada, much of Oregon and Utah, and portions of California, Idaho, and Wyoming. It is noted for both its arid climate and the basin and range topography that varies from the North American low point at Badwater Basin to the highest point of the contiguous United States, less than 100 miles (160 km) away at the summit of Mount Whitney. The region spans several physiographic divisions, biomes/ecoregions, and deserts.”[iv]
What are major basins known for, if not the gReat basin of north-ameRicas. The camping is gReat in mTNS. when one has freshwater streams many w tRouts species. However, my last times there were 25 years ago, and invasive-Plastispheres have contaminated waterways and any water. That the increased fallout has not happened from above ground “testing” does not demean that worldwide upper-Stratospheric molecules of pu-239, pu-240, ur-238, ir-235, ur-234 and thorium-234 have not abounded on your vehicles and tents and may I say when did you last wash your head-hair in the deserts expanses of the “gReat basin”?
The development of nanotechnology for military application is an emerging area of research and development, the pace and extent of which has not been fully anticipated by international legal regulation. Nano-weapons are referred to here as objects and devices using nanotechnology or causing effects in nano-scale that are designed or used for harming humans. Such weapons, despite their controversial human and environmental toxicity, are not comprehensively covered by specific, targeted regulation under international law. This article critically examines current international humanitarian law and arms control law regimes to determine whether significant gaps exist in the regulation of nanotechnology focused on offensive military application. It presents and evaluates the reasons why more robust regulatory mechanisms under international law for nano-weapons should, or should not, be considered. Lastly, the strengths and weaknesses of different models of international regulation for nano-weapons will be examined.
The renewed Israeli military attack in Gaza in early 2009 was widely condemned as contrary to basic principles of international humanitarian law, one notable example being the indiscriminate use of lethal and maiming white phosphorus in densely populated civilian areas.1 Equally problematic under the international law of weaponry in that conflict, albeit not so widely reported, was the alleged use of a novel weapon called Dense Inert Metal Explosive (DIME).2 DIME involves an explosive spray of superheated micro shrapnel made from milled and powdered Heavy Metal Tungsten Alloy (HMTA), which is highly lethal within a relatively small area.3 The HMTA powder turns to dust (involving even more minute particles) on impact. It loses inertia very quickly due to air resistance, burning and destroying through a very precise angulation everything within a four-meter range — and it is claimed to be highly carcinogenic and an environmental toxin. This new weapon was developed originally by the US Air Force and is designed to reduce collateral damage in urban warfare by limiting the range of explosive force.4 Its capacity to cause untreatable and unnecessary suffering (particularly because no shrapnel is large enough to be readily detected or removed by medical personnel) has alarmed medical experts.5 DIME (at least on some definitions) may well be a manifestation of a new generation of nano-scale technological impacts upon modern warfare that at present appears to be poorly regulated under international law.
Nanotechnology is a rapidly expanding industry estimated to be worth US$1 trillion worldwide within the next ten years.6 It involves research and manipulation of matter on the atomic and molecular level, working on the nanometre scale (1nm = 10-9m) generally speaking at a range less than 100nm (1 micron). A nanometer is a billionth of a metre, and engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) are highly reactive and mobile within the human body. At this level, the physical and chemical properties of many engineered nanoparticles (ENPs), as studied by techniques such as atomic force microscopy (AFM), neutron and small angle X-ray scattering, differ considerably from their bulk equivalents.7 For example, they have considerably larger surface area per unit mass (increasing their potential for both reactivity and biopersistence), are very hydrophobic and electrophilic, and have quantum effects below 10nm involving altered conductivity, catalytic properties, wavelength of emitted light, magnetisation and potential to magnetically activate cell surface receptor proteins.8 This creates promising opportunities for diagnostic and therapeutic product development.9 The above factors, however also are stimula-ting intense concern about health and environmental risks.10 Such risks are also relevant to the rapid development of military nanotechnology.
The military use of nanotechnology is expanding rapidly, as evidenced by details of the funding poured into military research and development in nanotechnology in countries such as the US, UK, India, Sweden, and Russia. Nano-weapons, as we discuss in this article, are an under-regulated form of military technology in international law and this is likely to cause major problems for both civilians and combatants during and after armed conflict. Nano-weapons are hard to define, but encompass not only objects and devices using nanotechnology that are designed or used for harming humans, but also those causing harmful effects in nano-scale if those effects characterise the lethality of the weapon.”[v]
The full-Extent of aRmament needs via US-congressional budget has never been completed, but should be annually. This abrogation is the tip-off that pRopaganda does over-Assert. Will ever normal be war? No. As wars-Warring is masse` annihilation, what gets harder is tRying to not lie to oneself. Meditating does help iron the fabric of waylaid sweaty-Nites w privileges re-arranged despite laws “not-allowing”.
There are many poems that I am editing that have gone into formulas of chronology and volumes-Writings, too! This cacophony does not relate on those pResidentialist edicts of transference-on-Data, merely the larger and more gRotesque putrifactions of chaos, for plutocracy, exist in the nebulous-Spate, of public knowledge or propaganda: is not oNLY, which is where anarchyist-Presidents have been morosely seen like Holywood celebrities than orthodox anti-Leadership entities, “fascist” and apparent to capitalist-Totalitarianism.
One of my favorite poems that is either in one of the three-volumes yet to be copyrighted, tomorrow. “R”
poem Hegemonyites dRiving beneath chem-tRails into garbage 7-15-18
NSDU-238 remains as the same as similarity of neutered-Self,
but was the day before yesterday,
as every UN-declared-War day,
as an Un-declared war-Warring illegal-Invasion
as those have been 39-years in-a-row
we-Socialists say “Propaganda may and does oppress”
but who says HALT NSDU-238, each and every day for you
that is mother-Fooker #2, where is like-Talk to
all you do and you will want to discuss
oNLY ”thermo-Nuclears” that is mother-Fooker #1,
of course, since Sept. 11th 2001 “directed Energy Weapons
is that is mother-Fooker #3. Ban-the-Bomb
symbol is morally akin “B-A-N mother-Fooker’s #’s1-2-3”!
Rape, murder, rape of Ecology, murder of the people,
the civilization devastated by B-52’s bombs
just as Invasion Vietnam–plutocracy injustice a trip away!
Iraq land 1991 thru 1999…now utilizing B-2 bombers
the feasability that nuclear-weapons is understood
by the public when toxicology is a US-military and NSA
propaganda-Miasma mission w.o. principles what
is/was NSDU-238,why was that garbage used
for pRopaganda as well as contaminating
“The atmosphere was very interesting- atmosphere
of friendship, not simple, but comrade relations, officers,
engineers. But we had debates about new novels in Journal
of Foreign Literature. We had debates about new jazz music.
I grew up on great American jazz, it was not really forbidden.
In the same time, it was big debates about politics. And
when Khrushchev gave information about victims of
Stalin’s terror, it was big debates. An interesting time,
provocative time, romantic time, if you want”
(just like growing-up U.S.S.R.).
“Since the beginning of the war, particularly when
it started to have a clear military nature on the southern front
in particular, the Israelis used to shell Syrian forces continuously,
and consequently provide direct support to the terrorists.
Israeli artillery and aircraft are the terrorists’ artillery and aircraft,”
Assad said. Syria will continue to build up its air defenses
to tackle Israeli aggression and will continue to fight
the jihadists to secure its sovereignty, the Syrian
president vowed.” (rt news “Assad: Hezbollah not leaving Syria
yet, war against terrorism to continue” time: 13 Jun, 2018)
while NSDU-238 was used, the cacophony of exposures
will accumulate and assimilate in america’s military
service-Personnel as also in geopolitics
Volatility was the day before yesterday,
every UN-declared-War was Un-declared
but the mule-deer are yet lifting their leg
on the corner of every house and cabin
to oRm-D those chem-tRails
daily metaphysic is the mule-deer are soooo pacified
they help make a peaceful day by being around
Volatility was the day before yesterday, every
UN-declared-War was Un-declared
instead of geoengineered strontium-90
written by “R” Addison 7-15-18 @ SRC
–note: I’ve been punishing myself not to donate to ‘southfront’ or to read, now I have and can do both, SYRIAN FORCES SEIZE FRENCH MADE ANTI-TANK WEAPONS IN DARAA
There has been much ado regarding “Electric Universe” in my news-Tableau, these pass informative years, four of post retirement and suRgeries due, those long awaited on nonsense-Medicare. While astro-Physics is not always the gRavity prone 100’s of millions times more powerful than a hand-held magnet I used as a 5-years old, child, just because I’ve grown older, does not mean that gRavity is stronger than electromagnetic-Fusion. Specifically, I am not into hosting the electro-magnetosphere as an eradication-Plan, not just yet, to rid the planet of all plastispheres of contaminants, because I’d want that to be eradicate via physicality to vacuum-Up, all Radionuclides and even NSDU-238 ceramic coagulations that Dr. Rosalie Bertell ,has expressed to me in person 2003—little-D: denver – and w.i. her book: Planet Earth, the Latest Weapon of War (3rd edition, 2016) and have a conveyor-belt micron-Dispenser to sort and keep fRom humans getting irradiated while “de-Contaminating millions of tonnes “garbage” radiating-Radionuclides, not of a stupor-market verity. Thus, a shall host this simplissitude. “R”
“Ganymede’s electric charge means it interacts with Jupiter’s magnetosphere.
Planetary scientists sent seven different science experiments to Jupiter over the last forty years, beginning with Pioneer 10 in 1973. Of all Jupiter’s moons, Ganymede is possibly the most exotic, with a mix of topography, including fractures, craters and sinuous rilles.
Ganymede is unique because it is one of the few rocky bodies in the Solar System with an intrinsic magnetic field, something even Mars does not possess. During a flyby of Ganymede in December 1995 at an altitude of only 838 kilometers, the Galileo spacecraft discovered a dipole magnetic field similar to Earth, only much weaker. The signature of Ganymede’s flux tube, the electric current that connects it with Jupiter, can be seen in Jupiter’s polar aurora. Professor Don Gurnett and his team at the University of Iowa discovered powerful plasma waves near Ganymede.
With a mean diameter of 5262 kilometers, Ganymede is the largest moon, and is the fourth largest rocky object after the planet Mars. Its magnetic field is supposedly created by the moon’s core in a “dynamo” of sorts—again like the Earth’s core is supposed to generate its magnetic field. However, Ganymede’s core is thought to be too hot to hold on to permanent magnetism. On the other hand, Ganymede is so small that, according to conventional astrogeology, it should have cooled off billions of years ago and not have a liquid core in the first place. This is a puzzle to astrophysicists.
In an Electric Universe, it is plasma streaming into Ganymede’s thin atmosphere that creates the electromagnetic emissions. Power output from Jupiter electromagnetically sputters its frigid surface, generating both its atmosphere and ionosphere. Observations of Ganymede’s terrain indicate that the sputtering effect was far more intense at some time in the past.
Could Ganymede’s magnetic field be related to the electrical phenomena that scarred its surface? If Ganymede was closer to Jupiter at some point in its past, and was then wrenched from orbit and thrown thousands of kilometers farther out from its parent, could that force have been electrical in nature? Was the moon gripped by an electrodynamic field large enough to imprint its core with permanent magnetism? What effect does the electrical connection with Jupiter have on Ganymede today?
Galileo data continues to be analyzed. One interesting discovery about Ganymede is the presence of “whistler waves”. Low-frequency electromagnetic radiation exists on the moon, erupting in bursts that last a fraction of a second. They are considered a sure sign of electrical phenomena. A whistler is an extremely low-frequency electro-acoustic wave that is normally generated by lightning. They are called whistlers because they demonstrate a characteristically decreasing frequency falloff in detection equipment. In some short-wave radio transmissions, the whistle can be heard while tuning between stations.
Since Ganymede radiates in the infrared with more energy than can be account-ed for, Electric Universe advocates presume that there must be a source for that heat. Ganymede possesses an ionosphere, so it is an electrically charged body. Its ionospheric charge flow carries electricity from Jupiter, as well as from the Sun’s solar wind ions. It could be that Ganymede is constantly charging and discharging in the infrared.
Ganymede is not really separate from the Sun; it acts like an element in the vast electrical circuit that powers the Solar System. Plasma discharges in that scenario are not so “unexpected”. The observational data, coupled with ideas put forth by such luminaries as Irving Langmuir and Hannes Alfvén, proves that lightning on Ganymede was both expected and predicted by Electric Universe advocates.”[vi]
Actually, I would prefer to call ”solar ‘wind’ ions” solar-Ionization. The new-Improved, if eveR there was a need of tRanscendency, now, had already started by 2004. The “electric-Universe (EU)” has descended upon tRuth as though pRopaganda was a mere-Toy, which has been the case, that much I’ve seen, already—past five-years. Rekindled faith in proper words utilized and spoken as well have give much cReedence to factual-Identity of our cosmos, the lack of a strong-foRce and the over-gRatuity of gRavity does all, has been eRased. The new or laconically, centuries olde-tRyst for tRuths, is beginning to wear into the familiar of not-so-vacuous, after-all! R”
“Under the premises of the CO2-thesis, these geo engineers tamper with noth-ing less than the planetary dimension of the earth’s elements. With the oceans (“oc-ean fertilization”), the layers of the air (aerosols, “Solar Radiation Management”, SRM, sprayings, s. Bertell 2013, p. 2543; 319), and the ground (deforestation (!), action in regard to more “albedo“, sun reflecting white spaces and clouds), to screen the earth against solar heat and/ or for more effective CO2 absorption and to eliminate the necessity of CO2 reduction. Although the dangers resulting from CO2 are supposedly threatening, this approach denies the need to further deal with the issue – that is how to get rid of it itself! The process of fighting “climate warming”, once initiated in an engineering context, would need – as is said by geo-engineers – to be sustained “indefinitely” in order to maintain the climate and not risk an immediate overheating of the planet under the sweltering heat of a sun allowed to shine in blue skies. As a matter of fact, a partial warming of the earth is indeed taking place. However, this is not happening in the troposphere where CO2 actually accumulates, but rather in the higher layers of the stratosphere in which HAARP and similar facilities – the “ionospheric heaters” – are active! (Phillips 2011).
In total, global warming cannot be a result of CO2 emissions after all! (Bertell 2013, pp. 321-323). CO2 is dirty, but it is not heating up, as she says. Apart from Bertell hardly anyone has noticed that the environmental crisis in the guise of the so called climate crisis, as well as the alleged solutions for this crisis, namely geo-engineering, both originate from the same military laboratories!
Ironically, as said in Hamilton’s contribution to Bertell’s book: The military itself does not assume the existence of any kind of climate crisis at all! The measures of military geo-engineering do not aim at reducing climate warming. These measures have been invented for completely different reasons, namely military ones: they are geo-weapons (Bertell 2013, p. 58).
Instead of figuring out how to stop military disruption and manipulation of the climate through, as Bertell states, “weather wars, plasma weapons, and geo engine-ering” by, for example, turning off “ionospheric heaters” globally, the discussion is focused on fighting the consequences of this global war – precisely by employing the same measures that have actually caused them!
The fact that it isn’t the alleged CO2 issue or even „evil nature“ opposing us, re-mains concealed due to the creation of deliberate confusion! One of most generous private sponsors of geo engineering, which poses as a civilian measure to counter the consequences of CO2 emissions, while actually being a military scheme tow-ards the planet, is the wealthiest man on earth, Bill Gates (Bertell 2013, p. 253f; Hamilton in Bertell 2013, p. 504).”[vii]
This may be the last Ecosocialism, until my shoulder-replacement surgery has been allotted from sales of used/useful items and from completion of my 3X-volumes, that are almost done today! My inclusion of Dr. Rosalie Bertell w whom I expended 2.33 hours of listening and asking her in little-D, at what I remember was a room @ A.F.S.C. in little-D: denver (2003). Much else to get “catched-up”. Mainly, my stoRies are suffering, especially thse of “the we-People I met”. All told, living in the med-Bow past 4X years has been too much driving, and my ‘metal-Sculpts” are suffered due space-Time allotments of the tyRanny of state: plutocracy, nonetheless. I’ve met over 8-10,000 people on my tRavel-tRavails 1964 thru 2013.
(submitted by) the peace-Warrior
 “BRIEF HISTORY OF OLIGARCHY (FULL VERSION)” 08 Aug 2018 Written by Rosa Tressell and Dr. Leon Tressell exclusively for SouthFront https://southfront.org/brief-history-of-oligarchy-full-version/
 “Yellowstone Nat’l Park, lodgepole fires, what year?” g00gLe search
[i] “What is BPA, and what are the concerns about BPA?” Mayo Clinic, Answer From Brent A. Bauer, M.D. https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/expert-answers/bpa/faq-0058331
[ii] “Grizzlies eat what kind moths” g00gLe search…
[iii] “U.S. Military Is World’s Biggest Polluter” MintPress News May. 15, 2017 02:59PM EST htts://www.ecowatch.com/military-largest-polluter-2408760609.html
[v] “Nanotechnology and the International Law of Weaponry: Towards International Regulation of Nano- Weapons” HIitoshi Nasu & Thomas Faunce http://www.leurenmoret.info/waves/nanoweaponry-/nanotech-law-of-weaponry-/nanotech-law-of-weaponry.pdf
[vi] “Plasma Waves” Stephen Smith August 8, 2018 https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2018/08/08/plasma-waves/
[vii] “Book presentation and interpretation: Planet Earth, the Latest Weapon of War by Rosalie Bertell and its updated German version “Kriegswaffe Planet Erde” (3rd ed. 2016) Earth as Weapon, Geo-engineering as War by Prof. Claudia von Werlhof Global Research, November 28, 2017 University of Venice