skip to Main Content

anti-nucleaRist bloG #69/ 24 Oct 2011 Khaddafi was murdered by N.A.T.O. intel-Gence & 2001 anthrax

anti-nucleaRist bloG #69/ 24 Oct 2011

Khaddafi was murdered by N.A.T.O. intel-Gence & 2001 anthrax


Is there no doubt that Oligarchs maintain “the plutocracy” or otherwise, there would be no concurrent “occupy Wall street and delete the Federal Reserve”? In other words, would UN-declared wars be required were not derivatives-Spending blending the WTO & WHO into a corporate laiety of excise-Impunity? People used to say money’s not-the-point when they actually did not complete the sentence, is not so sentient today!! How come that looks the same? The completed sentence should have words “because we pay into healthcare, but all we get is rip-OFFs forwarding wars that cripple, that maim, and that contaminate the planet-Erathe (olde-Saxon: English)! We have no Universal (single-payee) altho we each pay into “Medicare” is the rip-OFF! Dig.


When in 1981 in Tripoli, Libya, and I realized that I had been as our whole group was wont to not point at me—by Mossad, by Interpol, by cIAS, by jihadists, and revolutionar-ies —this was how north-Africa was then, and until Libya’s clash w revolutionaries being called merely “rebels’ how N.A.T.O. was to dissuade the exact interviews for terms by journalists not embedded, but of a wholly “free” itinerary. This one point seems to be overlooked as much as NSDU-238 usage was “doomed-to-be-Abused buy NA.T.O.” as military force from Europe, was not an actual E-U military. The reason may or not be that N.A.T.O. gets quite a few import of munitions from Hope Ontario, or that it’s not good for the earth’s soils” whatsoever”? Let’s justly state, that iconography for Ecology has been remiss in u-S since an imbecilic-Cognizance started to support conditionalist-Theoretic(s) and allow that subjective dissolution to be aired “freer than smog” talk, remuneration, association who gathered to have molecules measured thruout the mountainous state of Colorado. Per se—UN-justly did not happen!!                 “R”


“Clinton’s statements were clearly well rehearsed, aimed at assuaging the worldwide revulsion over the footage of Gaddafi’s lynching. As for her “gut reaction,” that was revealed on the day of the killing itself, when she laughingly told a reporter, “We came, we saw, he died.”

Indeed, barely 48 hours before the lynching of Gaddafi, the US secretary of state had flown into Tripoli, where she declared that the Libyan leader should be “captured or killed” as soon as possible.

This was hardly an offhand comment. The entire eight-month US-NATO war against Libya has been waged with the aim of “regime change,” ousting Gaddafi and installing a client regime that would more pliantly do the bidding of Washington and its NATO allies, along with the Western energy conglomerates.

Utilizing the popular upheavals in neighboring Tunisia and Egypt as a cover, the US and its allies deliberately fomented armed confrontation in Libya and then sought to drum up support and secure UN sanction for intervention on the phony pretext of protecting civilian lives.”


US and Gaddafi: The murderer calls for an investigation of the crime

24 October 2011 WSWS by Bill Van Auken




The appellate of truths is not so replete as Bill was not in Libya—nor Sirte—for the matter! Alex Jones show explained w a personal-account in north-Africa, Libya, that the whole method of reporting concurs w Hillary being there to bring Khaddafi to trial, a fact that morosely become the “usual” endemic of “we who are in control murder” which relates to how Osama bin Ladin most-likely perished. Fact is that Illegal IN-vasions usefully remain illegal, more than reports state “ultra-legal”? Most likely Alex’s reporter’s are as close to the truth as penetrating the social and military aspects that [pertains to ‘ascertainable-truths’] period. The official account from on-the-ground, is what I shall assuage as “documented-truth” as per what transpired-Happened, and all facts account w or w.o. regrets? Murder is UN-just. Yes.         “R”


Madsen: Gaddafi Flying White Flag When Killed

by Kurt Nimmo @




On my investigation in 1996, I met w a military-Investigator who told me “you did not see that aero-Jet” which was a Boeing 767 flying 500 feet above the west land across street from the Pentagon-Building, where I wasn’t going for anything more than photos. I always keep my timing in correlatives of space-Time, so that my physical need for positioning each photo is prepared. I took photos of the lawn from the parking lot where access was denied all but a few visitors. The next thing I was meeting w a team who said go meet this man, also in Washington d-C and SINC kept preoccupying my mental dissolution toward my gaining where the geographic-Discrepancies may arise—which was already the jet in Capital air-space i.e. w.i. five-miles radius. Then, until I met Bruce Ivins, who had promised not to talk to others my feeling was continually, why go thru all these misperceptions unless counter-Intelligence was futile?

My background is not criminology but intel-Gence debasing social-truths of universality and universal “language0Usages” or by “knowledge-basics of scientific inquiry”. He was one not-to-answer any on his research-task, but he did say, that he appreciated my foretelling him, that psycho-Logics was being used in “para-military fashion on me, and that may be an indication of a broadening pattern”. All these facts are now being written by me for reports to 9-11 truthout documenting what my outlying study of Conditionalism has been. Further postings I shall offer more of the story I maintain, as well as differentiation of stats/facts that the WTO building and loss of four aero-jets two-shot down and not yet accounted in regard-to-Truths of the missile deaths at penataGooons-Building.         “R”


“The case against Ivins remains inconclusive, in large measure because of the long delay in identifying him. The Bush administration initially sought to link the attacks to its campaign to prepare the political climate for launching its war of aggression against Iraq.

Even when the investigation shifted to a US source for the anthrax, Ivins himself was one of the main consultants for the FBI for several years, despite being identified as a potential suspect by at least one former colleague who knew of his psychological instability. Because of his suicide, Ivins was never questioned in detail about the allegations outlined in lengthy FBI affidavits released to the public after his death.

There is ample evidence, however, that USAMRIID was grossly negligent in relation to its own security and the security of the American population that its research was ostensibly to protect. The result is that the only known case of a terrorist attack on American soil using biological weapons was conducted using a strain of anthrax developed at the Army’s own germ warfare laboratory.”


“No US government investigation is likely to clear up the ongoing mystery of Ivins’ role in the anthrax attacks. Aside from the overriding political imperative of concealing as much as possible the connection between US germ warfare experiments and the anthrax attacks, the Justice Department has an impossibly conflicted legal position, insisting that Ivins acted alone, while maintaining that the Army was not negligent in allowing a highly unstable individual to have access to deadly anthrax spores.

These contradictions came to a head this summer in the $50 million lawsuit by Maureen Stevens, widow of Robert Stevens, a photo editor at the Sun tabloid, who was the first fatality in the 2001 anthrax attacks.

Justice Department lawyers suggested that Ivins might have produced the anthrax spores elsewhere than at Ft. Detrick. They filed papers claiming that “Ivins’ actions were not foreseeable to his supervisors at USAMRIID,” and hence “the United States should not be held liable for his actions.”

As one newspaper summarized the position: “In trying to minimize USAMRIID’s liability, government lawyers have had to walk a fine line, because the FBI says Ivins produced the anthrax powder at the facility while the civil lawyers are arguing it could have been prepared elsewhere.”…”


New questions raised over 2001 anthrax attacks

By Patrick Martin 
24 October 2011 WSWS


a voice fRom the VOId, the peace-Warrior,

“R” Addison


–note: (attempted to post on Bravenet dot com ‘free-Blogs’ @ 4:45 pm; then sent to CCjP 5;11 pm); peace-Warrior pRefeRRed bloG post #24

Tags/ Boeing 767, missile deaths, osama bin ladin, revolutionaries, USAMRIID, conditionalist-Theoretic(s), 9-11 truthout, Washington d-C and SINC, NSDU-238, N.A.T.O., Bruce Ivins, para-military, Ft. Detrick, bring Khaddafi to trial

Bio-sketch (2-27-16)…

I started into believing that I would be able to show my data and my photogRapHics in 1996. By 1998 I was learning computers would gain ascendant methods thru technics of programming for a future connected to data and information. That was nuclear-Molecular finding(s) to share and my personal-Activism w first account specifics and engendering(s).

As cameras went 'digital-Tech' I fond that editing was also to follow in 2004. Then, in 2005 my first digital camera had replaced usage(s) of s.l.r. 35 mm's. I have no mercy nor pity for the thieves who have stolen my hard werk, as anxiety of what I allowed was mid-stReam--anyway! Those asshole-Pukes have cost me $1,000's on a fixed income and I remain single, sole-Survivor of two-Families w.o. offspring!

This Post Has 0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 × 3 =

Back To Top
×Close search