skip to Main Content

anti-nucleaRist bloG #269/ 04 Sep 2019 Peace, tReaties on D.E.W. and NSDU-238, plus militarization of cyber space

anti-nucleaRist bloG #269/ 04 Sep 2019

Peace, tReaties on D.E.W. and NSDU-238, plus militarization of cyber space


**re-Vamp on 15 Oct 2019

Peace is what we need, and what enlivens our desire to maintain a spiritus of non-Caustic occasioning to the thought waves we pattern on our Universalist ways of weigh-ins “why dumb-fool” wars” and worse. We see that nano-Technology has become plutocratized, and that mean that “cyber-Space is being militarized” non-Characteristically! A context of the new-Rome is Plutocracy, the system, now coupled w deep-State, police-State, intel-Gence Estate of the Internet’s inception, as US-military-Hegemony is the waste-eRathe tendency. There is no auspice of amelioration by the technocrats-Elites usury, as impugning says consistent w the tyRanny or the system. The fascist-Punks have made my Life into a paradox, for theirs is empiricism of the tYranny-Rex.


Whereupon, I moved into an oasis, not to become “chemicalized for Ionizationings” as I have transcribed that into visual-Amenity for the theoretics of american-Socialist: party to fear losing the inviolate conditions of stress and to watch for pTSD in their civilians acquaintancing, too. How many wArs does a people, americans, maybe, need before an UN: declared-War is ‘declared’? The new-Rome is the new-Empiricism, is the system is the plutocracy the olde-Rome warned us about, by obviating from their laxities, their decadence. The U.S. of Plutocracy, does not need you, they obliterate your food, your housing, constantly interfere w “national-Heath: medicare-Act”? Ohh my now, any decade that will HAPPEN. Really, when is that? All for wealth of the 99% fookerbiltski-Ville nouveau-Riche and the paltry don’t wirk billionaires.           “R”


“WILPF is increasingly concerned by the militarisation of cyber space and supportive of solutions that move us closer to cyber peace and beyond seeking stability. The concept of cyber peace is evolving and being defined in different ways.  Some have noted that it is more than the mere absence of conflict and must be grounded in a concept of positive peace that eliminates structural forms of violence; while others have explored how cybersecurity due diligence, global commons regimes such as those for the sea or outer space, and bilateral investment treaties can form the basis of a cyber peace approach.


WILPF believes that the pursuit of cyber peace necessitates processes that will understand cyber space on its own terms and consider its specific characteristics, including its overwhelmingly civilian nature, by avoiding an approach that imports concepts from traditional disarmament and arms control. WILPF recommends that the humanitarian and human rights impact of cyber operations be a guiding principle and central to multilateral discussions of cyber peace and security rather than being treated as a secondary after-thought to national security concerns.

WILPF believes that existing international law, including international human rights law and international humanitarian law applies to activities in cyber space provides a shared baseline. But this should not be taken to mean that the existing legal framework is sufficient. In fact, the current framework can be seen as a patchwork in which differing interpretations and understandings of key concepts and actions have created an easily exploitable vacuum, in which problematic emerging practice risks become the norm.

WILPF recommends steps that reduce the motivation to pursue aggressive cyber capabilities, such as through positive obligations or actions, and encourages efforts to break through playing of politics on this issue. Inclusivity and transparency are imperative.


Issues of concern and debate

Concerns about the negative use of digital technologies, or “information and communication technologies (ICTs)” to use the phrase common within the UN community, are multi-dimensional and complex, engaging different actors in different ways to address a very wide spectrum of threats and concerns. For example, the actors involved in addressing cybercrime activities in pursuit of financial gain are different than the actors who are concerned about protecting our human rights online, or those who are interested in the role that digital technologies play in international relations, particularly in conflict and rivalry between states.

The issues of concern and debate described in this section relate to cyber peace and security as it fits within international relations and does not encompass all aspects of this issue. That said, it’s important to underscore the importance of wide and multi-stakeholder engagement, given the ubiquity of this problem.

The militarisation of cyber space

Since the first instances of malicious cyber operations between states were uncovered, there has been a growing presupposition of cyber space as a militarised space. This is a dangerous path for states to continue down, given the civilian and dual-use nature of cyber space and digital networks.


Consider, for example, the growing role of digital operations within military doctrines and strategy. Precise estimates vary, but it is generally accepted that at least a dozen states, and possibly as many as 30, are developing or have in place offensive cyber capabilities in connection with their military structures and/or doctrine. Some, including NATO, have acknowledged cyber space as a new operational domain of warfare.

Moreover, the way in which we talk about cyber security in the context of international relations (using terms like “cyber weapon,” “cyber deterrence,” or “cyber bomb”) reinforces the weaponisation of this space by grafting onto the characteristics and concepts associated with war and violence. ICT security discussions have largely taken place within the same fora as traditional disarmament and arms control, further weaponising what is an inherently civilian technology. In these fora, states have overwhelmingly expressed concern about the security of their “critical infrastructures” without making the link between those infrastructures and the human lives that they service and protect.

By treating cyber primarily as a military and security issue, states and other actors risk institutionalising and taking for granted the broad idea of cyber conflict. In the ongoing discussions about norms of responsible state behaviour in cyber space, it’s essential that such norms are viewed as obligatory commitments and that space is also given to articulating a vision of cyber peace.”[1]


The institutionalizing of “chem-tRails blotting-out natuRal-Weather” is a new-Constant from the tyranny-Rex of “U.S. of Plutocracy, false-state” called ‘deep-State’. 1998! Yes. As I have stated pReviously the “egRegiousness-Extent” is their Philosophy. They hinder where they can to ripoff the publics and continue the enterprise of making Bourgeoisie, not pRoletaRiat. There is no room for “the Republic to continue as Republic, when wArs eradicated the Republic”, in the first flaunted no laws-Rules, ignominy. There is a consciousness of losers: loose, while tyRanny-Rex is merely Conditionalist philosophy that needs be followed. How then, can dingle-Berry consequence relegate “cyber-Space” will continue for the we-People of Democracy, when and while theirs-is-Fascism, continues to abate the need as well as necessity? Read those ‘tReaties” but know, also, those are merely, miserly. They do not tRansposit that the “three nucleaR-Molecular: weapons” need be tReatied against. Dig?           “R”


“An entirely different scientific study conducted by noted United Kingdom scientist Dr. Ian Fairlie, who completed his PhD at Princeton University, shows that 5-million people still reside in highly radioactive areas and that there has been an increase of 700% in cases of thyroid cancer and a 200%-500% increase in Leukemia cases. All one needs to do to see the lingering effects of Chernobyl and the damage that radiation has caused in Chernobyl is to look at the haunting photo gallery entitled Chernobyl Legacy: Radiation Poisoning taken by photographer Paul Fusco a little more than a decade after Chernobyl. Mr. Fusco also narrates a video of his photographs from his trip to help to provide context. There is also a short documentary by the name of Chernobyl Heart which chronicles the effects of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster on the health of children in the area of the plant. The film won the Best Documentary Short Subject award at the 2004 Academy Awards. You can watch the heart wrenching film  above. Unfortunately, instead of speaking truth to power, Forbes Magazine has allowed self-promoting industry data to be used in this infomercial while actually discarding real scientific independent peer-reviewed research.


Another discordant note that appears in the Forbes accepted opinion piece ­discredits real medical science in its attack on the World Health Organization’s (WHO) estimate of premature deaths caused by Chernobyl. In his published opinion in Forbes, Shellenberger claims that because the WHO uses the “linear no threshold” (LNT) model, its estimates are exaggerated. In a rush to meet the desired growth of major nuclear corporations, there has been a recent push by a fringe group of pro-industry scientists to change the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules away from LNT, thereby increasing the amount of toxic chemicals and radiation that industries in the United States would be able to place in products and dump into the environment. Unfortunately, this ill-informed science is popular with the current U.S. Administration. However, according to a recent story in the LA Times,


This view — that pollution and radiation can be beneficial — has many experts worried. The fact that such a position may become EPA policy, they say, portends a future in which corporate desires outweigh public and environmental health.

“Industry has been pushing for this for a long time,” said David Michaels, former assistant secretary of labor for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration who’s a professor of environmental and occupational health at George Washington University. “Not just the chemical industry, but the radiation and tobacco industries too.”

If the EPA ultimately adopts Calabrese’s proposed new regulations, researchers say it could change decades of standards and guidelines on clean air, water and toxic waste. It could also fundamentally alter the way the government assesses new chemicals and pesticides entering the marketplace.

“This is industry’s holy grail,” said Michaels.

Later in the Forbes Magazine nuclear industry sponsored opinion piece by Shellenberger asserts another falsity when it asks:

Why were they destroying Fukushima’s precious topsoil in order to reduce radiation levels that were already at levels far lower than posed a danger? Why was the government spending billions trying to do the same thing with water near the plant itself? Was nobody in Japan familiar with mainstream radiation health science?


The soil is being removed and the water is being purified because it is highly radioactive. The pro-nuke Environmental Progress organization claims it endorses mainstream radiation health science, yet it does not. The LNT (Linear No Threshold) model is mainstream science that has been repeatedly endorsed by scientific bodies like the National Academy of Sciences, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, and  the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

The next fallacy Forbes Magazine continues to market in this fake news pro-nuke industry promotion is calling the meltdown at Three Mile Island (TMI) a dream,

What about Three Mile Island? After the accident in 1979, Time Magazine ran a cover story that superimposed a glowing headline, “Nuclear Nightmare,” over an image of the plant. Nightmare? More like a dream.

The 40th observance of the March 28, 1979 meltdown at TMI begins tomorrow, Saturday March 23rd at the Pennsylvania State House and culminates in a presentation at Penn State on March 27th. The first of the commercial nuclear power meltdowns was anything but a dream for the real people living nearby. Many residents were exposed to high levels of radiation because the plant owners outright lied to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, President Carter, and Pennsylvania’s own governor, so that all those government officials failed to issue a timely evacuation because they did not know that a meltdown was even in progress!

While the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission data claims that no one died from radiation emanating from TMI, independent research shows this is simply not true. Studies by epidemiologist Dr. Steve Wing show that cancer rates in the surrounding area significantly skyrocketed following the meltdown at TMI. You can listen to Dr. Wing talk about his studies and the implications from a video taken at the Pennsylvania State Capitol on March 26, 2009. Fairewinds Energy Education also has a video of the 38th commemoration presentation Arnie Gundersen gave in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania on its website []. In this video, Mr. Gundersen discusses the significant errors in data claimed as accurate by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Yet Shellenberger relies upon the scientifically refuted data promoted by the NRC for his Forbes Magazine nuke power promotion piece.”[2]


The N.R.C. is a cRutch of the coRpoRate-Sleaze entity that is obeisant to fascist-Business aka gHW Bushwhacky crime family. Meanwhile, Fairewinds, touches and/or goes into in-Depths procedurals, but has yet to finesse` that “phytoRemediations” holds more than the Future w.o. decadence always allowing “Ionizationigs” which they also do not get into, because the stRonitum-90 is not the capstone, or cesium-134 å 137 cannot be removed from Pacific-Ocean, when the pu-239 ought not be there anyway, alongside all “daiichis-Radionuclides: contaminations” pouring into the pacific via freshwater accumulations and run-offs. Sooo much for not mentioning the NRC is bought and forwarding always state-Mandated tyRanny-Rex thru “the plutocratized-System”. Ohh wow, they got around to that, but the chase is rhetoric that ought be “un-done” as well.



“From the very beginning, the bureaucracy’s response was fearful. Far from closing their eyes, they began to give tentative answers to the youth. Within the bureaucracy itself, these mobilisations catalysed a process of rupture. A section of “reformers,” led by Dubcek, gained enough strength to oust Novotny from the government.

Dubcek was not a leader who wanted to push the masses towards political revolution. On the contrary, he persistently sought to maintain – and at no time put at stake – the interests of the Czech Stalinist bureaucracy. The purely economic measures that he wanted to implement initially were designed to give economic compensation to the administrative bureaucracy from the profits of the different industries. These measures were to the detriment of the companies that were not ‘profitable’ – all those that were under workers’ control. This would then serve as the justification for the closure of these branches of production and the dismissal of thousands of workers.

Mexico 68 10

This is a classic policy of a Bonapartist who tries to balance between the different wings of a bureaucracy. With the policy of defending the differentiation of salaries through bonuses for factory managers, it can counterbalance the other wing (the state bureaucracy).

The bureaucracy didn’t fear the radicalisation of the intellectuals, or even of the students, but rather they feared that this atmosphere among the intelligentsia would reach the workers. Dubcek was very afraid that a wave of mobilisations by the workers would put him in the same situation as that of Hungary in 1956, when the workers organised themselves into real organs of workers’ power and fought for workers’ democracy.


To try to mitigate the danger, the Czech bureaucracy conceded to the intellectuals, signing a series of decrees that granted freedom of expression and other democratic rights.

The concern was that, if concessions weren’t granted, radicalisation would spread. But this would have happened even with the concessions. The Czech workers, seeing the opportunity to throw out the bureaucracy, took to the streets dramatically. Political discussions took place everywhere: in factories, in markets and public squares. Even within the Communist Party, the debates were very intense.

The Soviet bureaucracy was very concerned about what was happening in Czechoslovakia, not only because the reforms that were taking place there could unleash a series of petitions in Russia similar to those from the Czech intellectuals, but also because the reforms did almost nothing to stop the radicalisation process, and instead encouraged further debate among the workers.

In spite of the reforms that the Czech bureaucracy gave to the movement, it tried with all its might to raise the failed Hungarian revolution of 1956 as a warning that the movement should stop immediately.

By then the debate among the workers had reached a fever pitch, with one Czech newspaper publishing a series of articles on the need for workers’ democracy!

The Kremlin had to be decisive. Thousands of Russian soldiers and troops of the Warsaw Pact invaded Czechoslovakia. The bureaucracy preferred that the Western media launch a smear campaign on the Soviet bureaucracy than risk letting the process go any further in Prague. The favourite slogan for the intervention, as it was during the events of 1956 in Hungary, was that the movement was directed by “destabilisers that want capitalist restoration.” Of course, nothing could be further from the truth.”[3]


Again and again, once the accoutRements of fact tRanspiRes, we-People are yet indeed in need of action, activism, fast-Paced thought, and maintenance of “thought-Discourse”. Whiling the offensive-Chemicalizations pouring fRom microns alreadt tRansmuted to other “morally more-Toxic” as the toxicity is apparency to our knowing we’ve been had, we’ve been bought and we’ve got to acknowledge to ourselves for others. Their encrustation of planet-eRathe has got-to-be-HALTED! As 21-years and start-ups to our: “apparency to our knowing” was already aforeknowledgement by the deep-State or the US-military-Hegemonyites will buy-Off any ole agency to make that enteRprise as spastic as improbable.             “R”


“Geoengineering Earth, Exposing The Global Climate Modification Assault ( )”

51:27 mins. 175,328 views 17 Sep 2015


“Every two years, The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) takes groups of newly elected members of Congress on a delegation to Israel to see a one-sided view of the political situation facing Israelis and Palestinians. These junkets, known by some as the Disneyland tour, help AIPAC secure ever-increasing amounts of unchecked U.S. financial and diplomatic support for Israel despite its ongoing war crimes against the Palestinian people.

Did you know that a full two-thirds of all foreign congressional trips are to Israel, mainly through AIPAC? AIPAC trips not only white-wash the occupation but they also violate US law. That’s why last month we filed a complaint with the Office of Congressional Ethics that AIPAC congressional trips to Israel are in violation of the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act (HLOGA). But, in order to make sure that our complaint moves forward, WE NEED ONE BRAVE CONGRESS MEMBER to join in. Send a message to all the members of the progressive caucus asking them to require an investigation of AIPAC.

The HLOGA, enacted in 2007,  bans any lobbyists and organizations employing lobbyists, from providing lawmakers with gifts of travel—exactly what AIPAC does—but AIPAC gets around this by using a loophole in the law which allows congressional travel through a 501(c)(3).


Between January 2008 and July 2019, 1,789 congressional trips to Israel were paid for through AIPAC’s 501(c)(3), the American Israel Education Fund (AEIF). The problem though—how AIPAC is violating both the spirit and letter of the law—is that there is zero separation between AIPAC and AEIF. AIEF and AIPAC are in the same building, AIEF employees are paid by AIPAC, not AIEF, and AIPAC staff (including lobbyists) join the congress members on the trips.

The way congressional ethics complaints work is that, when filed by an organization (like CODEPINK), the ethics committee can choose to take up the complaint or to ignore it. But, when a member of Congress files a complaint, it automatically triggers an investigation. Send a message to all the members of the progressive congressional caucus asking for one brave Congress members to hold AIPAC accountable for its devious exploitation of the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act.

AIPAC’s all-expenses-paid trips to Israel via AIEF were for decades a right-of-passage for new members of Congress. But, this year, we campaigned for freshmen Democrats to skip the trip. While in 2015 only three freshmen congresspeople skipped the trip, this year 31 freshmen Democrats declined to travel with AIPAC. AIPAC’s stranglehold on US foreign policy is finally waning and we need to take it to the next level by holding AIPAC accountable. Join us in finding one brave congress member to ensure an investigation of AIPAC.”[4]


Is the A.I.P.A.C. a religious fRont for repatriation of Judaism? No, not really, maybe in part. Is AIPAC a covetous for moronic-Zionism? Yes, in part. Does AIPAC represent the need for Israel to become a “constitutional-State”? Partly. Then, what, in heck, is AIPAC? Does an american-pRogRessive flip his/her finger to zionism, to IDF, to Mossad and 9-11 black-Ops not arrested by fascist-America, lacking diplomacy since the USS-Liberty attack and 39-deaths in 1968? I would say ‘yes’. Did the pRime ministers of Israels, ever thank the US: military-Hegemony for NSDU-238 that they used in Yom Kippur War: 1973? Why should I tRy to be convinced by ass-Hole academics who want me to capitalize the zionist- Word” What an ugliscape their scAPe-Goating tenets for not having any manners yet always regarding any dissolution of false-Flag, of falsities, of lies, and of not stating point-Blank to the last nine, el pResidente’s, u.s.a. have your manners re-Tuned? There is a message that many aspects of US-support for Israels becoming a state was that zionism bought the Israels “off” because they have not been oge-Nal “semites” since 2,100 years back, jack!            “R”


“It is my firm belief that 9/11 skeptics—and true skeptics of any paradigm-shifting and taboo subject—who publicly expose lies and ‘naked emperors’ are heroes …They have suffered the ridicule and wrath of those emperors, their minions, and the just plain frightened…In our American society, many of our authority figures routinely lie to us, but nonetheless, many citizens continue to look to them for truth and safety—especially when fear is heightened.

This strong tendency to believe and obey authority is another obstacle with which skeptics of the official 9/11 account must contend…By unquestioningly believing and obeying authority, we make very bad decisions, which often negatively affect others. This can be equally true for the four human proclivities studied by social psychologists: doublethink, cognitive dissonance, conformity, and groupthink.” – Frances Shure, clinical psychologist and early skeptic of the official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory that two hi-jacked commercial jet planes caused three concrete, steel-reinforced towers to explode into fine dust and collapse into their own footprints in less than 12 seconds.

“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” – Carl Sagan

“We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth … For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it might cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.” — Patrick Henry – March 23, 1775

“It also gives us a very special, secret pleasure to see how unaware the people around us are of what is really happening to them. … “What good fortune for those in power that the people do not think.” — Adolf Hitler” [5]


Generally, I feel that bRoad definition of any “assassination, or fBIS multiple-Abuses of power, must be clerical by the professional-prRoletariat, the pRoletariat and the future commissars of a new-Republic. That the new-Rome has worn-out the olde-Republic, long ago leaves us in demand for super-Extraordinary: democracy to creature-Feature what all has been remiss and to park, as I have done since 2004, on these blogs, into the knowns of sanctimony what did, elsewise, tRanspire that was not any but tyRanny for terrorism by the deep-State perpetRators. The events in the usages of deceive, masse` deceptions, lies, ultra planning w the intent to murder thousands of persons, has not ended,. Merely, that has been re-Awakened w curse-words on our lips and kindness toward others in our hearts. Not an easy aspect to factor, not an easy factor to write.  Soon, the 18th anniversary of September 11th 2001, will be community events, gatherings, protests, and, especially, thoughts regarding waylaid thinking about nucleaRism. That day will most likely not find ourselves discussing dictator, Duterte, Philippines mass-Murderer, who may or might have a past that involved sheltering Khalid Sheik Mohammed, who was caught in Indonesia after his involvement for “planning”.  And, whom, the latter his not been bRought to “court” for trial, due to being waterboarded for release of facts by fBIS. These are the little thinGY-Bops.          “R”


“…we accessed information from Spies and Traitors of World War II by Kurt Singer.  That volume, written just after World War II, notes the participation in the German-Indian Society of German intelligence chief Admiral Wilhelm Canaris (head of the Abwehr.) This makes the DIG an element of political, economic, military and intelligence continuity from the World War II period to the present.

Recapping information about what we feel is an “Illegal Immigrant Psy-Op,” we review the pivotal role of a fake Facebook account in the generation of the immigrant caravan that became a propaganda football for Team Trump in the run-up to the 2018 mid-term elections.

We also noted the murder of Mollie Tibbetts, allegedly by Christian Rivera. Bearing similarities to the mind-control of RFK assassination patsy Sirhan Sirhan and the apparent role of the Polka-Dot-Dress Girl in that gambit, Rivera “blacked out” and has no memory of the murder.

Next we review Glenn Greenwald’s pivotal role in running legal interference for the leaderless resistance strategy, the literature published  by the National Alliance, in particular.

We then briefly detail the leaderless resistance strategy as set forth by Louis Beam, noting that the Internet, social media, chat groups and bulletin boards dramatically amplify the reach of that strategy.

The Turner Diaries, published by the National Alliance, is highly influential in the milieu of the leaderless resistance. A novel, it was crafted as an instructional manual and tool of ideological inspiration to the Nazi movement.

Depicting a successful Nazi uprising against what is portrayed as ZOG (Zionist Occupation Government), the book opens with the confiscation of firearms by the authorities.

Although reaction to the recent shootings in El Paso and Dayton will not lead to the confiscation of firearms, any moves toward gun control will be portrayed as such in the fascist media and internet echo chamber.

In that context, we note that New Zealand shooter Brenton Tarrant intended his action to inspire gun control measures in the U.S., which he felt would lead to a Nazi uprising.

We conclude with review of Tarrant’s stay in Ukraine, and possible networking with the Azov Battalion.”[6]


How does the itinerant-State become the intel-Gence: state of plutocracy, such as the loss of the olde-Republic: u.s.a., and installation of the new-tyRanny: state of “‘the new-Rome of Plutocracy”. Does the word “smart” mean hurting or knowledgable? Did the zionist-Movement that started in 1904, make immense-Gains, by selling-Off an itinerant-Plan in 1945 to the fRench, the United States, and UK diplomats for no-Reparations after WW-2 or for irrepressible: consequentialist-Dispositions. If, sooo that as well as German pRisoners of War: WW-2 were allowed to starve a though an excuse was made. That excuse, the worser, that was solicited by Gen’l Ike Eisenhower, in charge of Germany, from Stuttgart or another township command-Center, in 1945[7]. He was not gainly “industrial-Military: complex” sooo much as the indispensable and repressible, reprehensive, a-Hole as bad as gHW Bushwhacky. These two-stats and the common-DenominatoR of egregious-Estate: mentality that is caused by heinous-cRimes of state. The mental-Illness of the populous of any “nation-State” or the Kurds and Okinawas, should come before war-Overtures for technological-Despicablity: pRoofs i.e. writ large, dispensary. Do not give the US-public any more pTSD in the formula of “chem-Fookering: tRails” in other words.        “R”


“Michael Parenti – The War on Yugoslavia”

1:17:26 mins. 108 views ‘State Socialism_1921’

My comments: (25 Sep 2019) This speech is yet aligned w the other and I feel accepts more responsiveness than that had. Dr. Parenti, has been the boomer generation’s standard on tRuthing, on non-DescRipt policies and on plutocracy-Polemics… a mentor, and non-Ascetic, nor empiricist!       “R”


“I find your report seriously flawed in its failure to address serious intelligence issues that I am aware of, which have been confirmed, and which as a witness to the commission, I made you aware of. Thus, I must assume that other serious issues that I am not aware of were in the same manner omitted from your report. These omissions cast doubt on the validity of your report and therefore on its conclusions and recommendations. Considering what is at stake, our national security, we are entitled to demand answers to unanswered questions, and to ask for clarification of issues that were ignored and/or omitted from the report. I, Sibel Edmonds, a concerned American Citizen, a former FBI translator, a whistleblower, a witness for a United States Congressional investigation, a witness and a plaintiff for the Department of Justice Inspector General investigation, and a witness for your own 9/11 Commission investigation, request your answers to, and your public acknowledgement of, the following questions and issues:

Photo of FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds

After the terrorist attacks of September 11 we, the translators at the FBI’s largest and most important translation unit, were told to slow down, even stop, translation of critical information related to terrorist activities so that the FBI could present the United States Congress with a record of ‘extensive backlog of untranslated documents’, and justify its request for budget and staff increases. While FBI agents from various field offices were desperately seeking leads and suspects, and completely depending on FBI HQ and its language units to provide them with needed translated information, hundreds of translators were being told by their administrative supervisors not to translate and to let the work pile up ( please refer to the CBS-60 Minutes transcript dated October 2002, and provided to your investigators in January-February 2004). This issue has been confirmed by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

… the administrators in charge of language departments of the FBI remain in their positions and in charge of the information front lines of the FBI’s Counter terrorism and Counterintelligence efforts. Your report has omitted any reference to this most serious issue, has foregone any accountability what so ever, and your recommendations have refrained from addressing this issue, which when left un-addressed will have even more serious consequences. This issue is systemic and departmental. Why did your report choose to exclude this information and this serious issue despite the evidence and briefings you received? How can budget increases address and resolve this misconduct by mid-level bureaucratic management? How can the addition of a new bureaucratic layer, ‘ Intelligence Czar’, in its cocoon removed from the action lines, address and resolve this problem?


Image of FBI Shield Melek

Can Dickerson, a Turkish Translator, was hired by the FBI after September 11, and was placed in charge of translating the most sensitive information related to terrorists and criminals under the Bureau’s investigation. Melek Can Dickerson was granted Top Secret Clearance, which can be granted only after conducting a thorough background investigation. Melek Can Dickerson used to work for a semi-legit organizations that were the FBI’s targets of investigation. Melek Can Dickerson had on going relationships with two individuals who were FBI’s targets of investigation. For months Melek Can Dickerson blocked all-important information related to these semi-legit organizations and the individuals she and her husband associated with. She stamped hundreds, if not thousands, of documents related to these targets as ? Not Pertinent.’ Melek Can Dickerson attempted to prevent others from translating these documents important to the FBI’s investigations and our fight against terrorism. Melek Can Dickerson, with the assistance of her direct supervisor, Mike Feghali, took hundreds of pages of top-secret sensitive intelligence documents outside the FBI to unknown recipients. Melek Can Dickerson, with the assistance of her direct supervisor, forged signatures on top-secret documents related to certain 9/11 detainees. After all these incidents were confirmed and reported to FBI management, Melek Can Dickerson was allowed to remain in her position, to continue the translation of sensitive intelligence received by the FBI, and to maintain her Top Secret clearance. Apparently bureaucratic mid-level FBI management and administrators decided that it would not look good for the Bureau if this security breach and espionage case was investigated and made public, especially after going through Robert Hanssen’s case (FBI spy scandal). This case (Melek Can Dickerson) was confirmed by the Senate Judiciary Committee ( Please refer to Senator Leahy and Grassley’s letters dated June 19 and August 13, 2002, and Senator Grassley’s statement on CBS-60 Minutes in October 2002, provided to your investigators in January-February 2004). This Dickerson incident received major coverage by the press (Please refer to media background provided to your investigators in January-February 2004). According to Director Mueller, the Inspector General criticized the FBI for failing to adequately pursue this espionage report regarding Melek Can Dickerson ( Please refer to DOJ-IG report Re: Sibel Edmonds and FBI Translation, provided to you prior to the completion of your report). I provided your investigators with a detailed and specific account of this issue, the names of other witnesses willing to corroborate this, and additional documents. ( Please refer to tape-recorded 3.5 hours testimony by Sibel Edmonds, provided to your investigators on February 11, 2004).


Today, more than two years since the Dickerson incident was reported to the FBI, and more than two years since this information was confirmed by the United States Congress and reported by the press, these administrators in charge of FBI personnel security and language departments in the FBI remain in their positions and in charge of translation quality and translation departments’ security. Melek Can Dickerson and several FBI targets of investigation hastily left the United States in 2002, and the case still remains uninvestigated criminally. Not only does the supervisor facilitating these criminal conducts remain in a supervisory position, he has been promoted to supervising Arabic language units of the FBI’s Counterterrorism and Counterintelligence investigations.”[8]


The ”fanatic-penataGooons dept-of-Offense” is despicable, because they are NOT-Defense but offense, they are morosely 99% and overrated-Oligarchs, and because they’ve curtailed governance at the national-Level in favor of non-Participatory “democracy”. How is that possible? We, the people, are the oNLY defense from state-Tyranny, the Rex of merely the second-Rome, the new-Rome. Take a look, that much is good for all of us. The features of the plutocRats system should be expelled from tyRanny-Rex. The buraucRats have been bought-off by a combination of “technocracy-TechnocRats” as well as the puerilessence connotes of usury, that of plutocRacy, a recapitulating: anarhco-Syndicalist, presentment if ever there should never-have-been. Always, the fanatic-penataGooons relay on aggressive-Weapons must be tested a.s.a.p before any defense from this is list-Premise of defense-Actuality! Did they, the ignominious: brass-Heads, get that idea from decades of lobbying and payments from ass-Hole: zionists, or from militarized-Zionists, or did they concoct, thru anti-Semitism, there are not those who are moreso: aRabs and others, now?         “R”


“As Canadian journalist and media critic Barrie Zwicker explained in his 2006 book Towers of Deception: The Media Cover-up of 9/11, mainstream journalists throughout Canada and the Western world failed spectacularly in their role to critically examine the terrorist attacks of September 11th 2001 and its consequences. [1]

Pertinent questions as to ulterior motives for a deadly military invasion of Afghanistan, or about the failure to scramble military aircraft to intercept the hijacked airplanes when they veered off course were never asked in the prominent newspapers, television networks and other major media organs of the day. Any skeptical inquiry of the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the months immediately following the attacks was confined to ‘limited hang-outs’ along the lines of the CIA ‘never getting its act together’ and ‘controversies’ about the crime possibly being ‘blow-back’ from America’s oppressive policies in the Middle East and elsewhere. [2]

One national broadcaster in Canada, however, proved to be an exception to this trend. VISION TV is a Canadian cable and satellite specialty channel based in Toronto reaching an estimated 10 million homes. It was largely due to Zwicker’s influence as VISION TV’s resident media critic that the provocative discussion featured on this week’s show ever made it to the public airwaves.

On the evening of March 14, 2002, the network broadcast a round table on the 2001 terrorist attacks on a special installment of VisionTV Insight: Mediafile. This discussion would include one of the few appearances in Canadian media by U.S. based investigative journalist Michael C. Ruppert.


Ruppert was, along with Professor Michel Chossudovsky of the Centre for Research on Globalization, one of the very first figures in the world to intelligently refute the official story of the September 11th attacks. He had outlined his key arguments in a hard hitting monthly newsletter called From The Wilderness, as well as on his online site He had also given a series of talks across the United States and Canada detailing his problems with the official story.

The conversation featured in this week’s Global Research News Hour radio program as it debuts its eighth regular broadcast season sees Ruppert face critical, albeit respectful push-back from at least two of the panelists. The discussion delved not only into the unanswered questions mentioned above, but also put them into the context of America’s imperial conquest of oil resources, and the role of drug money, including the proceeds of Afghanistan’s illicit opium trade, in financing the global economy. Questions relating to the vulnerability of Canadian sovereignty, the anti-democratic nature of ‘anti-terrorism’ legislation, and the role of journalists in the face of these developments likewise rise to the fore.

The audio of this conversation and video of the discussion had been discarded by the network years ago, and has since been recovered and restored. The show is being rebroadcast on the Global Research News Hour radio program with the full consent of VISION TV, whom we warmly thank for their generosity in this regard.

An online link to some of the recovered video footage of the conversation can be found here or click the image below to watch.”[9]


Global Research has been a good source when “american-Socialism” facts and fallacies cannot be found. They have, also, been more instrumental w in-keeping fact that “9-11 tRuth” often cannot sublimate. I’ve personally heard Prof. Michel Chossudovsky in Person in Toronto; Michael Ruppert, on the other, and I have talked several-Times, starting when we were audience for Ohh-bom-bah-bin-dingy’s intRo to u.s.a. pRoper; 1980’s; mS Sibel Edmonds and I had talked at her residence/office, as I had to wear blindfold to enter that building. All of us are tRuth and research apparent-Professionals (were in Ruppert’s case of suicide—or was that). There has always been needs of “shared-Data and intel-Gence covertness” factually released to the public or published in long-form! One of the more ‘fascist-Elements on human-Historic: record” has been that of nuclearism i.e. what is that and, why sooo much covetous? Radio has always been my way-of-choice, altho I am very-Much displeased w KPFA-fm because they never even apprroched “anti-War: imperialism” pRograms. That placed us-ProgRessive: socialists, in the extreme as though we needed not to kN0 whom we are, and to become “radicalized” for bourgeois: middle-class rhetorical-Excesses. Why not? They were not socialized-Enough, or they were already bought w commercializationings of “music-Is: somethinGy-Bop: whatever”.            “R”


“Introduction by Gordon Duff with Ian Greenhalgh and Jeff Smith (Nuclear weapons designer/particle physicist)

The material here is overwhelming, hours of lectures and dozens of detailed slides.  This is not an easy read.  It is another piece of irrevocable proof regarding 9/11 and the use of nuclear weapons and, on its own, worth much more than just scanning or flipping through.

Architects and engineers say planes don’t knock down skyscrapers.  Nuclear physicists say only atomic bombs can turn out this kind of heat and damage. The real investigators who were silenced by a grand jury and a wealth of threats said it

was a conspiracy and named lots of names, some expected, some not.

Now an independent physicist has proven the work done by the original investigators who were silenced and much new work as well.  His modeling and detail is breathtaking.

We were recently introduced to the work of Germany physicist Heinz Pommer.  I chose to contact him.  His work deeply parallels work done by the US Department of Energy and IAEA which was censored and suppressed so that the fake 9/11 report could be published and blame put on Iraq and Afghanistan.

Unlike Pommer’s work (aided by Jeff Prager), the VT team included some of those involved in the ill fated original investigation. Working from different data, to an extent, both teams have ended up with nearly identical results.


VT knows the who, how and when from official sources.  Pommer (and Prager), however, have taken their portion a step further and have produced what the original team would have presented to congress and the president, had they been allowed, of the proofs of nuclear weapons and their effects.  Their work is identical to the secret work by the DOE and Sandia National Labs but adds much as well.

Included are video presentations sent by Pommer to me and his PDF slides.  This material has been submitted to the US team and we will get their comments.

6.3     Demon’s trap 9/11

Your mind is not your consciousness. Your consciousness is your state or quality of awareness of your existence, of being a person.

Your mind, however, can be hijacked and controlled. Your thoughts can be guided to this and that, and finally your mind might simply play the role of an uneducated dog. It barks a lot: “be aware, intruders!”

If your mind is bent the right way (in the sense of the perpetrators of 9/11) you will accept nothing except the fairy tale of Osama bin Laden. Then your mind and your thoughts will clutch and grasp to the last straws, in order to save your world view. It will accept nothing, least of all an offending truth.

Truth, however, is important. So, lets start this subchapter rendering homage to one great defender of the truth, Saint Augustine of Hippo.

The next pages show 25 steps in which the destruction process of the South Tower and the processes in the ground are sketched. These sketches did offend many people and were harshly criticized as “fantasy sketches”, or even as a “dangerous effort to deceive the public”.

However, these sketches should be regarded only as a playful approach in an effort to understand a physical process and to calculate a more precise model afterwards. They don’t pretend being “The Truth”. For a conscious person, there is

nothing offensive in them. Even [though] your mind tells you so.”[10]


The boomeR-Generation used the word-Term: mind-Fook. for the very reason that pRopaganda-Model and MK-ultRa may have been used in-our-Midst, our TelegRaph Avenue gatherings and our unassailable “safety-directing” that I’d learned and utilized, in high school—across the san fRan bay i.e. beyond Hunters Point, where the USS-Saratoga was docked and somehow, had Radionuclides, removed before the scuttling on 1951! What georges-Enron did outside on his A.W.O.L. was never explained, and was a psychologic of purport to install his being as a recluse, which is where his past-Acts yet are located. Hmmm? The family ole-Good-ole cRiminal cover-ups for covetous-Sake writ learge when not in his office, during our conversings (Austin Texas). Georgey-wargy, as Prof. Michael Parenti calls him, ought explain, to both of us, as well as the u.s.a. Populous I admonish. Talk about “fantasy-Sketches”.          “R”


No matter what kind of invasion US-military has three-types nucleaR weapons in militaRy aRsenal

the peace-Warrior


Tags/ Cyber peace, and security, WILPF, NSDU-238, Fukushima, Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, prove why, nuclear power, never be inherently, Safe, Mexican student movement, of 1968, codePink, gRass Roots oRganization, why do good people, become, silent about Documented Facts, Turner Diaries, leaderless resistance, the Internet, FBI knew, about 9/11 plot, April 2001, by Sibel Edmonds, Guns ‘n Butter, let’s stop torturing, Germany – James Bacque, 9/11 and drug money, Oil Resources, Dr. Michael Parenti, the Invasion of Afghanistan, Michael Ruppert, refutes, Official 9/11 Story, Other Losses: an Investigation into the Mass Deaths of German Prisoners, published book, boomeR-Generation,

[1] “Cyber peace and security” WILPF (04 Sep 2019)

[2] “Fukushima, Chernobyl, And Three Mile Island Prove Why Nuclear Power Will Never Be Inherently Safe” 22 Mar 2019 by Grayson Webb, Maggie Gundersen, Blog Editor

[3] “The Mexican student movement of 1968” In Defence of Marxism by Ubaldo Oropeza  02 October 2018

[4] I get online releases and updates from the gRass Roots oRganization of haRdwuRking gals (and some guys)

[5] 9/11 Truth: Why Do Good People Become Silent About the Documented Facts that Disprove the Official 9/11 Narrative” by Dr. Gary G. Kohls, Global Research

[6] “FTR #1084 The Turner Diaries, Leaderless Resistance and the Internet” by Dave Emory 21 Aug 2019

[7] “Guns and Butter–Let’s Stop Torturing Germany – James Bacque, #405” hidden-Deaths to Germans by fRench, by Americans, by English when Germany was divvied-up into 4-parts, including Gen’l Eisenhower, bRutality against German P.O.W.S under the eyes of medical-Doctors…website is

[8] “FBI knew about 9/11 plot in April 2001” by Sibel Edmonds 01 Aug 2004 911tRuth

[9] “9/11 and Drug Money Oil Resources and the Invasion of Afghanistan: Michael Ruppert Refutes the Official 9/11 Story” 05 Sep 2019–the March 2002 Roundtable, Featuring Mike Ruppert. Conversation on Canadian TV. by Michael Welch and Michael Ruppert, Global Research

[10] “Gordon Duff, Breathtaking: Solving Nuclear 9/11, the Pommer Report” 29 Aug 2019 w James Fetzer

[11] Other Losses: An Investigation into the Mass Deaths of German Prisoners at the Hands of the French and Americans after World War II 3rd Edition by James Bacque

Bio-sketch (2-27-16)…

I started into believing that I would be able to show my data and my photogRapHics in 1996. By 1998 I was learning computers would gain ascendant methods thru technics of programming for a future connected to data and information. That was nuclear-Molecular finding(s) to share and my personal-Activism w first account specifics and engendering(s).

As cameras went 'digital-Tech' I fond that editing was also to follow in 2004. Then, in 2005 my first digital camera had replaced usage(s) of s.l.r. 35 mm's. I have no mercy nor pity for the thieves who have stolen my hard werk, as anxiety of what I allowed was mid-stReam--anyway! Those asshole-Pukes have cost me $1,000's on a fixed income and I remain single, sole-Survivor of two-Families w.o. offspring!

This Post Has 0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

7 + eleven =

Back To Top
×Close search