anti-nucleaRist bloG #263/ 19 Aug 2019
Realizing that America is not exceptional could lead to a better country
Where is Justice from Microns-Death? Suspense is not panic, unanium-238 is aerosolized w each and every US-military “usage” that is why the stuff is called “dirty li-Ace”. I had a-hole dirty, fecal-Poop a-holes used that on a drunk-Decision or a lark, or some-Other “hyped feelty”. How many surrogate-empire invasions for R-O-N-G phooels do we need before we have “hydrogen-Fuel cell” AND “Liquid natural Gas” as transport fuels which are NOT NEEDED by US military-Hegemony? How many mircons of virus and bacterium, any of which might spread when there is no “offensive-Measures” to be maintained, not to be misunderstood as understood thru military “tRial and eRror”? A guided-Missile’s range in-as-much-as NucleaRism has been coercive, pertains to distance and staying aloft or indeterminantly?
What all is capable of being “Radionuclides: nuclear-Powered” air-Aloft, since 1945, when that “atmosphere” was first breeched, and as well as carrying a warhead, too? That technology was assertive, as was done and as heralded into the one and oNLY “nucleaRism” misfit, in 1950’s, staging! I believe the US-military-Hegemony of elites for short-Term: profits have compromised our human-Disposition, must be looked into w every verity and factorable-Variety on and of chemicals that can cause “over-Exposures to the human immune-Deficiency” balances which are being tempered, which are being molecularly exposed, w.o. release of pertinent information to the UN-willing or naïve “public”. Thus, the abjection that I have against “nucleaRism” being too assuagingly relied upon, for both propaganda and hype that NSDU-238 is not a nuclear-Molecular weapon, when and while indeed that “stuff” is as much as “Directed energy weapon” which is both nuclear and nucleaRism atonement proceedings of hype and abhorrent denials propagates in similar mannerism is not informing again, why the “fookerbiltski-NucleaRism”? “R”
“The U.S., alarmed by the Soviet Union’s deployment of SS-20 intermediate-range missiles in the mid-1970s, sought a treaty to ban new nuclear weapons and eliminate those already aimed at targets in Europe.
The treaty, formally called the “Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles,” signed in 1987, banned all nuclear and nonnuclear missiles that have a short and medium range.
The ban included missiles that could be launch at a target that is between 310 to 3,400 miles (short-range) and targets that are between 620 to 3,420 miles (intermediate-range).The treaty did not affect missiles launched from sea or ones that would be launched from aircraft. The treaty was ratified by the Senate on May 27, 1988. Three years later in 1991, 2,692 missiles had been destroyed through a provision in the treaty — 846 by the U.S. and 1,846 by the Soviet Union.
… Russia claimed in 2016 that the U.S. clearly violated the treaty when it deployed a missile defense system in Europe and when Trump approved a $25 million program to develop a new cruise missile with a range of 621 miles.The back and forth came to a head in October 2018, when the U.S. announced its intention to withdraw from the treaty.
… “The denunciation of the INF treaty confirms that the U.S. has embarked on destroying all international agreements that do not suit them for one reason or another,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement Friday. “This leads to the actual dismantling of the existing arms control system.”
“Pulling out of this treaty leaves New START as the only bilateral nuclear arms agreement between the U.S. and Russia,” said physicist David Wright, co-director of the Global Security Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists. “If (President Donald) Trump pulls out of that treaty as well or allows it to lapse, it will be the first time since 1972 that the two countries will be operating without any mutual constraints on their nuclear forces.”
“Unilateral constraint was a losing proposition: China developed the world’s foremost force of missiles precisely within the ranges that I.N.F. would prohibit,” said Andrew Erickson, a professor of strategy at the United States Naval War College told The New York Times. “So this increasingly antiquated treaty had no future.”
“With the end of the INF treaty, a bit of security in Europe is being lost,” German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas said this week. “Now we call all the more on Russia and the U.S. to preserve the New START treaty as a cornerstone of worldwide arms control.
“We don’t want a new arms race,” NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said, but reiterated that Russia is solely to blame for the U.S. decision to leave the historic arms-control treaty signed three decades ago.
The INF treaty “has been extremely successful in the destruction of a total of 2,692 missiles” within the specified range, said Bonnie Jenkins, the former coordinator for threat reduction programs at the State Department. “Instead of highlighting this accomplishment, we are opening up the possibility of a new arms race by destroying limitations set forth in the treaty. This is another step backwards in our arms-control relations with Russia.”
“When something like the INF goes down the drain almost like nothing, it shows you the degree to which people have forgotten the power of these weapons,” George Shultz, who served as Reagan’s secretary of state, told Voice of America on Thursday. ”One day it’ll be too late.”
Do not enjoy “nucleaRism” as that tenet is not a freedom-Formidable for freelancing w suppositions tRuths regarding “masses-Annihilated” as that is done by “destabilization-Invasions” so as to aver non-Usages of merely one of three, nuclear-Molecular: weapons. As for myself, thinking and protesting against “directed-Energy: weapons” the most formidable or not. Is not precisely the question. Like, which harms-the-most is a contrarian-Delight. How stately is pRopaganda? Climate change is “chem-tRails and methane-Releases plus military- Hegemony Ionizing the Ionisphere. As we american-Socialists know, understand and realize, that may be that in a debate of the one-Party political-Party stooges, they bought their way in and yet have to remonstrate “the weigh-Ins” ought to desist. We say! What, a system?
Previously, I have stated, that: there are 1,200 anti-NucleaRists in the u.s.a., but I was short a few words—probably due the insurmountable pains of shoulder missing cartelege for 21 months—as there ought to be of all those anti-nucleaRist protestoRs, 1,250 each day who subscript the admonitions of nucleaRism, at any one time. This aspect is that the worldly: big-Tit, can provide sustenance, thRu the metastasizing of meta-Physics. In this manner our Universal context of space-Time w.i. the global-Village survives bRains intact.
By the way, there is no non-Universal “worldly: big-Tit” since we are peace-People as well. “R”
Firefighting foam liberally used by the South Dakota Air National Guard and Sioux Falls Fire Department decades ago is the source of significant pollution to the drinking water of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, residents
Municipal wells in the area have been found to contain polyfluoroalkyl or perfluoroalkyl chemicals (PFASs) from the firefighting foam, which include perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), one of the highly toxic chemicals used in the production of Teflon, and a similar chemical, perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
At least 126 drinking water systems near U.S. military bases are contaminated with PFASs, due to their use in firefighting foam
In Sioux Falls, at least a dozen wells have been found to contain PFOA/PFOS at levels above the EPA’s advisory level, one with concentrations 3,500 times over and another at 200 times the limit; 10 of the wells, which produced an average of 440 million gallons of water per year, may be shut down indefinitely
Firefighting foam liberally used by the South Dakota Air National Guard and Sioux Falls Fire Department decades ago is the source of significant pollution to the drinking water of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, residents. Nineteen municipal wells representing 28 percent of the city’s water coming from the Big Sioux aquifer have been shut down.1
Fifteen of them contain polyfluoroalkyl or perfluoroalkyl chemicals (PFASs) from
the firefighting foam, which include perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), one of the highly toxic chemicals used in the production of Teflon, and a similar chemical, perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS). The toxic legacy persists because once PFAS enters the environment, it doesn’t break down but rather persists indefinitely.
The extent of the contamination remains unclear, as do the potential health risks to longtime residents of the area. As reported by the Rapid City Journal, “As city officials grapple with the well shutdowns … it may soon face an even larger challenge when citizens begin to learn how long their drinking water was contaminated before it was detected and the wells taken offline.”…”
The toxicity from US military-Hegemony foreign-Bases operations-to-contaminate, are as hideous as what they use is not good for troops—grunts or naught! How insidious, not to have researched how to make 60% less “volatile/flammable” liquid: natural-Gas (LNG)? We need to take-over the E.P.A. by ridding the coRpoRate-Sleaze that the tRumpeteR allows for his own capital-Gains, which he pares as hardly worth paying takes on the 100’s millions EARNED by his corporation as well as more that 1,000’s others. “R”
“Residents Weren’t Notified of the Pollution for Three Years After the First Detection
It was 2011 when water leaving the Sioux Falls water purification plant was first tested for PFAS. It was tested again in 2012, but the city didn’t receive the results until 2013. PFAS was detected but at levels below the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) health advisory level. The city then tested all of their wells for PFAS and eventually shut down all that contained PFAS.
The city then tested for PFAS again in 2014 and 2016, when the EPA lowered its health advisory level for PFAS to 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 2016 tests found PFOS, which led to more wells being shut down. It was that year that the city finally released an announcement to tell residents about the contamination that had been found.
The culprits, as detected by a consultant hired by the Department of Defense (DoD) and reported by the Rapid City Journal, was firefighting foam used for decades, beginning in 1970. First the Sioux Falls Fire Department sprayed the PFAS-laden foam at the city’s airport weekly during tests and training.
In 1991, the South Dakota Air National Guard took over the firefighting duty and continued to release firefighting foam into the city’s sewer system.
At least a dozen wells have been found to contain PFOA/PFOS at levels above the EPA’s advisory level, one with concentrations 3,500 times over and another at 200 times the limit. Ten of the wells, which produced an average of 440 million gallons of water per year, may be shut down indefinitely. According to the Rapid City Journal:3
“Further investigation by the Air Guard is scheduled for 2019, including the possibility of off-base testing. Another report will follow, though it’s unlikely to be published until late 2019 or in 2020.
It’s been nearly five decades since the Air Force first used firefighting foam, one decade since the EPA set its first advisory level for PFOA/PFOS and a half-decade since the base learned of the city’s municipal well contamination. The Air Guard, however, shows no sense of urgency in completing its inspections.”
These chemicals are too “hearty” to be allowed on military-Bases, altho, seemingly, useful. That there is nowhere these chemcials should be used, is that main, major, enlightened or naught, factual-Indemnity, nonetheless. The economics regarding sales is short-Term financially, but gRotesque as cleanups takes centuries. The planet-eRathe is realy “not-to-be-used-as-a-Dumping, gRound” because the hardship then is nonsense financial-Gain. That “PFOA/PFOS at levels above the EPA’s advisory level” should not be used, finding a useful ploy in return is also irrational. The synthetic-veRsion has not been mentioned, whether there is one or not! “R”
“Why is the Trump administration threatening to pull out?
In October 2018, President Donald Trump announced the United States’ intention to exit the INF treaty due to Russian noncompliance. He also suggested the United States should renegotiate the treaty to include China, considered by US
strategists the primary long-term challenger to American power.
In early December, the US State Department declared Russia in breach of the INF’s terms and began a 60-day period for Russia to comply, otherwise the United States would notify parties to the treaty of its intention to withdraw. The US has said it would quit the accord on August 2, 2019 if Russia refuses to comply.
The Trump administration’s claims of a treaty violation are not new. In 2014, the Obama administration formally accused Moscow of producing and testing a new ground-launched cruise missile in violation of the treaty.
Officials in Trump administration later publicly identified it as the 9M729 missile, or NATO-designated SSC-8, with a range of over 500 kilometers in violation of the treaty. Russia was also accused in 2017 of actually deploying the missile system.
Repeated meetings between Moscow and Washington have failed to address treaty compliance issues.
US soldiers prepare to remove Pershing-II missiles from a base in the German town of Mutlangen
What does Russia say?
The Russians claim the 9M729 has a range of 480 kilometers and thus falls within what is allowed under the INF treaty. Russia has consistently denied it was breaching the agreement, instead raising a number of concerns over Washington’s compliance with the treaty.
The main accusation relates to the United States deploying the ground-based Aegis anti-missile system in Europe, something Washington has refuted by arguing it is a non-offensive, anti-ballistic missile defense system.
Read more: US: Russia’s INF rhetoric a ‘laughable’ fraud
Russia argues the NATO-backed system which it views as a threat can also fire offensive cruise missiles and has many of the characteristics of INF treaty prohibited missile systems. Moscow has also raised the issue of some US drones that it claims are equivalent to a ground-launched cruise missile.
Russia has also long complained that it is bound by the treaty while China, India, Pakistan and Iran are not.”
That power-Politics is the one-Party “system” which has abrogated our human-Rights and made this nation-State a debtor-Nation as well as an hierarchical-Monotony. The need for tReaties is the need for universal-Policy of non-Appeasement, or is that no-appeasement and enforcements on and for all tReaties to be maintained and relegated as useful until somethinGy-Bop gets the que, far better. The appeasement-Policy protects the seemingly endless harangues of Exceptionalism against the pRogRessive-Amenities to disregard apologetic-Polemics. This means that both “peace and Defense” is tolerated. The above treaties are not and were not anachronistic. That the START-III tReaty has not been discussed, merely the INF and the JPOAC treaty castigated dwells on ”power-mongering” not upon resourceful foreign-Policy: dictates of a sole-ImpRoprietoR i.e. the tRumpeteR. “R”
“” . . . . For many Internet companies, including Google and Facebook, surveillance is the business model. It is the base on which their corporate and economic power rests. Disentangle surveillance and profit, and these companies would collapse. Limit data collection, and the companies would see investors flee and their stock prices plummet.
“Silicon Valley fears a political solution to privacy. Internet Freedom and crypto offer an acceptable alternative. Tools like Signal and Tor provide a false solution to the privacy problem, focusing people’s attention on government surveillance and distracting them from the private spying carried out by the Internet companies they use every day. All the while, crypto tools give people a [false] sense that they’re doing something to protect themselves, a feeling of personal empowerment and control. And all those crypto radicals? Well, they just enhance the illusion, heightening the impression of risk and danger. With Signal or Tor installed, using an iPhone or Android suddenly becomes edgy and radical. So instead of pushing for political and democratic solutions to surveillance, we outsource our privacy politics to crypto apps–software made by the very same powerful entities that these apps are supposed to protect us from.
“In that sense, Edward Snowden is like the branded face of an Internet consumerism-as-rebellion lifestyle campaign, like the old Apple ad about shattering Big Brother or the Nike spot set to the Beatles’ ‘Revolution.’ While Internet billionaires like Larry Page, Sergey Brin, and Mark Zuckerberg slam government surveillance, talk up freedom, and embrace Snowden and crypto privacy culture, their companies still cut deals with the Pentagon, work with the NSA and CIA, [and companies like Cambridge Analytica–D.E.] and continue to track and profile people for profit. . . .”
What sooo terse as not having a defense, but causing the economy to collapse around the insobrieties of 800 US military-Hegemony bases? All is heresay, talk that the US: h-bOmBs arsenal could wipe-out Red China or Russia or India, or melt the Antarctica continent. That is merely no-Hospitals to treat fallout wounds in a special-Care unit is not available to any more, in u,s,a, that 50-beds per 100,000 people. The military-Bases are not cost-Overrun on research of “how to stop Radionuclides from becoming cancerous gRowths” nor A.I. removal of radionuclides that are microns size and do not show-up w Geiger-Meter body-Surveillances. The defense of planet-eRathe is about pre-infant stages of one-week foetus, for comparison.
The chemical company Monsanto has been sold to the world’s largest “chemicals company” because there are 132,000 lawsuits in courts around u.s.a. and around Europe “pending” as the nature of glyphosate is now in human-Bodies, in food chains, and in water sources already being contaminated w Radionuclides, w plastispheres, as chem-tRails acid-Reins continue to harbor in the capacity to destroy the coniferous-Trees. Like dead bodies, the additions of “nuclear-Molecules: content” has surpassed whatever is a threshold that A.I. will not be recommended for billions-Dollars BAILOUT. “R”
In The American Trajectory: Divine or Demonic? David Ray Griffin traces the trajectory of the American Empire from its founding through to the end of the 20th century. A prequel to Griffin’s Bush and Cheney, this book demonstrates with many examples the falsity of the claim for American exceptionalism, a secular version of the old idea that America has been divinely founded and guided.
The Introduction illustrates the claims for divine providence and American exceptionalism from George Washington to the book Exceptional by Dick and Liz Cheney. After pointing out that the idea that America is an empire is no longer controversial, it then contrasts those who consider it benign with those who consider it malign. The remainder of the book supports the latter point of view.
The American Trajectory contains many episodes that many readers will find surprising:
That the sinking of the Lusitania was anticipated, both by Churchill and Wilson, as a means of inducing America’s entry into World War I;
that the attack on Pearl Harbor was neither unprovoked nor a surprise;
that during the “Good War” the US government plotted and played politics with a view to becoming the dominant empire;
that there was no need to drop atomic bombs on Japan either to win the war or to save American lives;
that US decisions were central to the inability of the League of Nations and the United Nations to prevent war;
that the United States was more responsible than the Soviet Union for the Cold War;
that the Vietnam War was far from the only US military adventure during the Cold War that killed great numbers of civilians;
that the US government organized false flag attacks that deliberately killed Europeans; and that America’s military interventions after the dissolution of the Soviet Union taught some conservatives (such as Andrew Bacevich and Chalmers Johnson) that the US interventions during the Cold War were not primarily defensive.
The conclusion deals with the question of how knowledge by citizens of how the American Empire has behaved could make America better and how America, which had long thought of itself as the Redeemer Nation, might redeem itself.
David Ray Griffin has done it again. His new book should be read as a prequel to the seminal Bush and Cheney: How They Ruined America and the World. Supported by extensive research, Griffin thoroughly debunks the myth of an American Empire as a benign, exceptionalist, divinely ordained historical agent. Instead of Manifest Destiny, what reality-based Griffin charters is the ‘malign’ ways of US foreign policy since the 19th century. . . . He unmasks the lies surrounding the true story of the Pearl Harbor attacks. He asks: If the US was really guided by God, how could it ‘choose’ to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki, knowing that “the atomic bombs were not necessary to end the war?” . . . This sharp, concise history of the American Empire ultimately demonstrates, in Griffin’s analysis, the ‘fraud’ of endorsing self-praising American Exceptionalism. A must read.”—Pepe Escobar, Asia Times/Hong Kong; author of 2030 and Empire of Chaos”
Decades back, around 1996 of the last-Millennium, I sought to hear Prof. David Griffin, as well as try to resolve the concerns on Universality and Universalism, that I had maintained since age-eleven, His talk while @ Pfitzer College, a college w.i. the Pomona College incorporated, allowed me two discretions i.e. what do women know regarding foreign-Policy equating, and what do we, Universalist-Unitarians know. He did not speak as a Universalist, and I recollect his Universalism had aspects of the bombing of wTC building. While the background he had was quite technical, his idiopathic was surrogate of foreign-Policy: demise, pluralism. Then, next time (approximately 2006) rev-Paul and I drove 45 miles from Pasadena nearby Cal-Tech Institute, to Pomona, for a public-Talk by David Ray Griffin. I had parked my OTR-tRuk in the usual spot by a vacant lot now incorporating the hot-Air releasing asphalt-Hyrdocarbons, paRken lot, of an “automobile dealorship” ever-so-Exceptionalist. What was yet on my mind w both ministers was this: ”where has the context of Universalism gone, in-as-much-as” we are all Universalist-Unitarians or are we—anymore”? Was that Exceptionalist, or merely, the correct-Question? “R”
“So what really happened? Why is Zelenskii apparently dead set on repeating all the same mistakes Poroshenko made?
As I have indicated in a recent article, the Ukraine is not a democracy but an oligarchy: ever since 1991 the most prosperous Soviet republic was mercilessly plundered by an entire class (in the Marxist sense of the word) of oligarchs whose biggest fear has always been that the same “horror” (from their point of view) which befell Russia with Putin, would eventually arrive at the Ukraine.
Here we need to make something clear: this is NOT, repeat, NOT about nationality or nationalism. The Ukrainian oligarchs are just like any other oligarchs: their loyalty is to their money and nothing else. If you want to characterize these oligarchs, you could think of them as culturally “post-Soviet” meaning that they don’t care about nationality, and even though their prime language is Russian, they don’t give a damn about Russia or Russians (or anybody else, for that matter!). Since many of them are Jews, they have a network of supporters/accomplices in Israel of course, but also in the West and even in Russia. In truth, these guys are the ultimate “internationalists” in their own, toxic, kind of way.
The Saker: Ukie Nationalism vs Otto von Bismarck
Some fine specimens of “ochlocrats”
The other significant force in the Ukraine is the West Ukrainian (Galician) Nazi death-squads and mobs. Their power is not a democracy either, but an ochlocracy. These guys are a minority, a pretty small one even, but they have enough muscle and even firepower to threaten any nominal Ukrainian leader. Furthermore, these folks have profoundly infiltrated all the police and security forces which, in theory, would have been able to control or disarm them (the SBU, especially, is chock full of Urkonazi thugs).
Now let’s begin by looking at the oligarchs: their number 1 priority is to continue to plunder the Ukraine. For that, you need the opposite of “law and order”: you need lawlessness, chaos, violence and, most importantly, you need the tiny figleaf of “the Moskal aggression” to hide behind. In other words, while these oligarchs probably do not want an open a full-scale war with the LDNR (or, even less with Russia herself), they simply cannot allow peace to break-out.
The Ukronazis don’t want peace to break out either, lest their influence and power shrink back to something roughly proportional to their share of the population of the Ukraine. Besides, since their entire ideology and worldview is all about hating Russia and being anti-Russia, any peace with Russia is literally unthinkable for them. They and their Polish supporters want Russia to break apart in numerous small state-lets which they (or, in their delusional dreams, the Chinese) could dominate. These folks will always perceive Russia as an existential threat. In their own way, they are absolutely right: Russia will always remain the reality check on their delusions. This was as true in the distant 13th century as it is nowadays.
Finally, let’s keep in mind that neither the oligarchs nor the Ukronazis genuinely want the people of Crimea and the Donbass to be part of “their” Ukraine since the overwhelming majority of these people would categorically oppose both the oligarchs and the Ukronazis. Yes, for prestige and ideological reasons, all these Galician Nazis will always declare that “Crimea is forever Ukrainian” and “we shall reconquer the Donbass,” but what they are genuinely fantasizing about is the territory, and only the territory. As for the 2 million-plus virulently anti-Nazi people currently living on these lands, they simply want them either dead or expelled).
So, while about 70% or so of the people of the Ukraine want peace to return and the horrors of the civil war to finally stop, the only two groups who have real power want the civil war in the East to continue. There are even quite a few Zelenskii nominees who have declared that war with the LDNR is the only way to solve the crisis. Some even want war with Russia!
Reality, however, is a pesky thing and, as the expression goes, if your head is in the sand, your butt is in the air and the collective Ukronazi “butt” has been exposed in the air for several years now. This is also true for the supposed “reforms” of the Ukronazi forces.”
The we-People are not over-the-Hump of having a “total-Return to our natural-Resource daily intake need”. Nor are we-Ecologists enterprising the vituperative needs for allowing methane-Releases when we do, indeed, need “LNG and hydrogen “fuel-Cell” technologies in 1974—before injected motor laissez-Faire. We certainly are over a barrel having shid-ski pumped into our anuses to aid the total-Indigestions along the way of moronic-Incapacities. Discomfort is not all that is proselytized as ‘defense’ as the US-military-Hegemony is maintaining a “non-Clean-ups stance ad-Infinitum”. The cases for cleanups of the major chemical, again chemicals is against-the-Wall, as “Perfluoroalkyl Chemicals (PFASs) Pollute Millions of Gallons of Water. Why pollute when the deadly-Aspects must be “cleaned-Up” is not soap-Suds on a counter-top in kitchens. Never waz, either! “R”
“Quite a few signs are indicating that most of the so-called “reforms” and “reorganization” of the Ukronazi forces were more about corruption (what else!?) and window dressing than anything else. Galicians are generally famous as world-class torturers and executioners of civilians, but not really military commanders (this is why Ukronazi “historians” are now desperately parsing every year in the history of what is called the Ukraine today to find some kind of “Ukrainian” victory; all they came up with so far are very small, completely irrelevant, local battles). In contrast, the LDNR forces seem to be doing pretty well, and their morale appears to be as strong as ever (which is unsurprising since their military ethos is based in 1000 years of Russian military history). Last, but certainly not least, there is Putin’s rather striking warning during the Olympics when he declared that any Ukronazi attack would have, quote, “very serious consequences for Ukrainian statehood.”
This warning was apparently heeded both in Kiev and in Washington, DC.
The mood of the Russian public opinion seems to be one of total disgust and frustrated anger. It’s not like Zelenskii was ever very popular in Russia, but at least he was no Nazi, and he seemed to be willing to take at least the very first steps towards finally stopping the insanity. That hope is now totally shattered (the Russian media reports all the anti-Russian statements of the various Zelenskii nominees daily).
While the Kremlin more often than not sticks to its traditional diplomatic language, most Russian experts appear to be fed-up with Zelenskii and his antics and are now all pushing for some kind of hardening of the Russian stance towards this 5-year long Banderastan. And the Kremlin has paid attention: Russia is now handing out passports to pretty much any Ukrainian wanting to get one. This is the first step in a time-tested sequence, the next one which would be the recognition of the LDNR as sovereign states (as was done in Abkhazia and South Ossetia).
Many wonder what in the world Putin is waiting for and why Russia has not officially recognized these republics yet?
The reasons for this are as simple as they are compelling:
“First, any premature recognition would further fuel the western fairy-tale about “Russia” having “invaded” the Ukraine to grab land. If the AngloZionists did not shy away from making such claims while Russian forces were still in their barracks, you could imagine the hysterical shrieks we would have heard from the “collective West” if Russia indeed had decided to move her forces into the Donbass to stop the Ukronazi aggression!
Second, to the degree that the Empire created an “anti-Russia” with its Ukronazi Banderastan, Russia created an “anti-Banderastan” with the LDNR. This is very important and must never be overlooked: yes, Nazi-occupied Ukraine is a never healing wound in the side of Russia, but Novorussia also is a never healing wound in the side of Nazi-occupied Ukraine. The big difference is that Russia is strong enough to cope with her wound, whereas the Ukronazi Banderastan never had a chance and has already collapsed beyond any hope of survival.
Third, Russia simply cannot afford to pay by herself the immense bill for the eventual reconstruction of devastated Ukraine. Just fixing Crimea is already an enormous and extremely costly task for Russia, especially after decades of Ukie neglect, but at least down the road, it is obvious that Crimea is headed for prosperity and that the returns on investment will be huge. But single-handedly rebuilding the entire Donbass is probably beyond the Russian means. Currently, Russia is already providing vast amounts of aid to the Novorussians, and she is basically maxed out.
Finally, let’s remember here that the UNSC approved the Minsk Agreements and that, as such, they are not an elective: the Minsk Agreements are obligatory under international law. And here is the beauty: Russia is not a part of the Minsk Agreements, only the Ukraine and the LDNR are. Thus while the AngloZionists mantrically repeat that “Russia must be sanctioned for not abiding by the Minsk Agreements” or “Russia must do more” – they all do secretly realize that this is empty, hot, air. Besides, even the duller western leaders now are beginning to realize which side truly does not want to abide by these agreements.
The Saker: Ukie Nationalism vs Otto von Bismarck
The sweet irony of Ukie politics: a Ukronazi vandalizes the portrait of the man who created the Ukraine in the first place!
These agreements are even less popular in Novorussia than they are in Kiev: it is an open secret that the Novorussians will never agree to be ruled from Kiev again. Ever. And, sooner or later, they will join Russia in some shape or form. But that is in the future. For the time being, the Novorussians are smart enough to realize that they should go along and let the Ukronazi idiots openly sabotage these agreements. And since Zelenskii and his nominees are now declaring that they will never negotiate with the LDNR (which the Minsk Agreements require), it is not Russia or the LDNR which destroyed these agreements, but the Ukrainian government, quite officially so.
One striking development since the election of Zelenskii is the number of Ukrainian political figures which have openly declared that the Ukraine should simply militarily re-capture the Donbass (some even suggested Crimea). It is thus probably a good idea to revisit the military options on all sides.”
Okay, sooo enough of having Ukraines look like Syria, and that neither has the affrontal to be baring-Witness that Gaudi Arabia which already has the anarchism to maintain, beyond what the Ukronazi’s thought they could do—despite nucleaRism of the west, nucleaRism in the rest of the world is not always similar. Due to time-Warps, warpage is the couthful reason to have tReaties that are also inspections, and what association has best accomplished that fact? The United Nations, of course. However, the Ukronazis do not have more than an ideology, was not questioned. Why have the Gaudis install a super: counter-Intelligence tRained by Israels—US client-state—or why the need to compete w intel-Gence in Ukraines. That id-Al is the perspicacity of the whole premise for installation in the once-Waz “Iron Curtain states” w N.A.T.O. aka US-military-Hegemony. They cannot be bought to fight the Gaudis. “R”
“MARC STEINER: And then a judge awarded punitive damages of $2 billion. But Bayer appealed, and the California Alameda County Superior Court ruled last month that punitive damages cannot exceed $200 billion, which is just a tenth of the original amount. Bayer shares soured in response to that announcement, and the company continues to seek a legal decision which will stop all pending lawsuits and prevent new ones.
One of the journalists who was most instrumental at exposing the health risks posed by Roundup–its glyphosate content–and talked to people who develop cancer after years of exposure to Roundup, is our guest, Carey Gillam. When Bayer learn of Carey Gillam’s work, they started a cyber defamation campaign against her; creating fake accounts on social media, challenging her methods and motivations, and even paying Google to divert search results to blogs and other resources created to attack her, rather than the ones that talked about the results of her research.
Well, Carey Gillam is a veteran investigative journalist with more than 25 years of experience covering corporate news, including 17 years as a senior correspondent for Reuters International. She’s the author of the book Whitewash: The Story of a Weed Killer, Cancer, and the Corruption of Science, which was an exposé of all we’re about to talk about with Monsanto and more.
…CAREY GILLAM: Yeah. I mean, this campaign by Monsanto against me has been going on for a long time. Well more than a decade, certainly. And I really was just doing my job as a journalist. I was reporting on the new scientific evidence that was coming out about different risks–cancer risks and other health risks–associated with Monsanto’s herbicides, Roundup and their other glyphosate-based herbicides. And in my book, Whitewash, which came out in 2017, I relied on thousands of pages of Freedom of Information documents that I obtained, and some internal Monsanto documents, EPA documents, and really made it clear that Monsanto had spent, many, many decades hiding–whitewashing–the dangers of this chemical. And the book talked about not only the dangers to human health, but the impacts on environmental health as well. And the company, they couldn’t find anything wrong in the book, but they sure didn’t like it. And so, that’s what they’ve been doing, is trying to discredit me and the book.
…In terms of the litigation and Roundup, all the lawsuits are more than 18,000 people who have sued Monsanto. It’s a big problem for them. And these trials–we’ve had three so far–are spotlighting all of this information that Monsanto wanted to keep secret for so long, which are not only the scientific studies that show evidence of harm, but all of these very subversive and secretive ways that Monsanto sought to manipulate the scientific literature, manipulate regulators, and manipulate members of the media.
MARC STEINER: So this is a huge piece of the company, glyphosate. I mean, some people will argue that part of this is because they’re worried about their stock, it went down, and they want to increase the stock price. But I mean, I’m sure that’s part of it, but it’s more than that. Because the way they go after people–it hasn’t been just you, they’ve attacked scientists and others who have attempted to raise any questions about the safety of their products. And they have a huge political influence in this administration in Washington and administrations across the globe. So I’m just curious, for you and others who are investigating this, what comes next? And where do you think this goes next?
…CAREY GILLAM: Right, right. Well, Monsanto had a lot of value. I mean, that’s why Bayer paid $63 billion for it. They have a very rich seed and genetic trait portfolio. Their genetically altered seed business brought in quite a lot of money. They were a very dominant player in this herbicide market, the glyphosate based herbicides. They also have dicamba based herbicides. Monsanto has long been a very big player and had a controlling interest in dominance in the agricultural sector. And Bayer wanted a piece of that. So from that perspective, it made sense for them.
What they didn’t do, and where they fell short, is they obviously did not do sufficient due diligence to understand the liability that lay within this glyphosate based business. And this could–if this unravels and glyphosate is banned, people move away from it, then these genetically altered seeds that are tied to glyphosate tolerance become less valuable. So it is a very big problem for Bayer. They didn’t do their due diligence, and they should have.”
That glyphosate is a huge Contaminant, should not be left on sales pitches as of a decade, ago! Will north-Americas waterway-Systems be able to eradicate thru mixing the micron-Sized contaminant in one-Minute. Then, why use that stuff? We know that the more, space ‘n Time, those big-Business chemical coRps use the gargantuan polemic, the worse our once-Waz: lifestyle w a closeness to rationale thinking also disappears, too! “R”
HALT all export of ur-238 munitions & Electromagnetic Fusioning
the peace Warrior
Tags/ INF treaty, why did U.S. pull out, Perfluoroalkyl Chemicals, (PFASs), pollute millions gallons of water, power-Elite plutocracy is, the new-Rome, the Saker, Ukraines, rebels & nazis, Ukronazis, Surveillance Valey, Dave Emory, American Trajectory, Divine or Demonic, Dr. David Ray Griffin, INF nuclear treaty, Bayer/Monsanto, silencing Journalists, Activists, Scientists, NSDU-238, Monsanto sued, litigation and Roundup, Novorussians,
 “What is the INF treaty and why did the U.S. pull out of it?” 02 Aug 2019 by Debbie Lord, Cox Media Group National Content Desk https://www.ajc.com/news/national/what-the-inf-treaty-and-why-did-the-pull-out/VBxNoWOFrAlDirXtqVqiHK/
 “Perfluoroalkyl Chemicals (PFASs) Pollute Millions of Gallons of Water” 20 Nov 2018 Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2018/11/20/perfluoroalkyl-from-firefighting-foam-linked-to-water-pollution.aspx
 Ibid. This report shows how absolutely horrendous the power-Elite plutocracy is.
 “What is the INF nuclear treaty?” 02 Jan 2019 by Chase Winter https://www.dw.com/en/what-is-theinf-nuclear-treaty/a-45981536
 “FTR #1081 Surveillance Valley, Part 7: Yasha Levine Gets the Jim Garrison/Gary Webb Treatment” 30 Jul 2019 by Dave Emory http://spitfirelist.com/for-the-record/ftr-1081-surveillance-valley-part-7-yasha-levine-gets-the-jim-garrisongary-webb-treatment/
 “the American Trajectory: Divine or Demonic?” by Dr. David Ray Griffin -07 Sep 2018 https://911truth.org/american-trajectory-divine-demonic/
 “THE SAKER: UKIE NATIONALISM VS OTTO VON BISMARCK” ‘southfront’ 16 Aug 2019 the Saker https://southfront.org/the-saker-ukie-nationalism-vs-otto-von-bismarck/
 “Bayer/Monsanto Silencing Journalists, Activists, and Scientists” 13 Aug 2019–Investigative reporter Carey Gillam talks about Bayer/Monsanto’s efforts to discredit her work and deflect criticism about cancer-causing glyphosate, a major ingredient in Roundup pesticide… https://therealnews.com/stories/bayer-monsanto-silencing-journalists-activists-and-scientists