skip to Main Content

anti-nucleaRist bloG #201/ 30 Jan 2014 © Violent Belligerent new-Rome: empire of stultifying dissatisfaction

anti-nucleaRist bloG #201/ 30 Jan 2014 ©
Violent Belligerent new-Rome: empire of stultifying dissatisfaction

Peace zones were first predicated as a method of defending communities from radionuclides waste transportation through towns, cities and counties or across nations in both Europe and the new-Rome Empire. The logical application of a practical nature for common ground was best understood by the people having to work in nuclear power plants, in nuclear military bases, around sac bases where nuclear weapons oftentimes are loaded onto B-52s. The vacuous nature of discarding radionuclides was totally unacceptable as well as transportation not being well enough documented nor the actual transport vehicle blowing waste from that vehicle into a Township or alongside roads were the nuclear dust would raise up again; one of the ways that low level radiation could be absorbed in the human anatomy or into the lungs.

Norway, Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands, and other nation-states where transport was utilized for making low-level waste into high-level waste i.e. enrichment. Altho the enrichment process is said to produce NSDU-238 of transuranic-radionuclides, the stipulations on the amounts of other decay nuclides, were not well known, but the transportation was necessary nonetheless. This caused great concern to ourselves in our communities, and of necessity became a major demonstration against building nuclear weapons and maintaining an protected sense, where ‘defense’ was never predicated. Since nuclear weapons are an offensive weapon the nuclear industry, the NRC, relegated themselves to anti-norms of unlawfulness ventures. For this reason, SANE freeze joined in the efforts to contain transportation routes. Thus, the burgeoning’s became a universal cause, of geopolitical and geographical considerations of peace, and ecologically, proved too much waste was being disposed of far-far too demised Radionuclides yet ‘decaying’. Thus, peace zones and defense opprobrium became a social commitment i.e. social responsibility. “R”

“Recalling the establishment, in 1986, of the Zone of Peace and Cooperation of the South Atlantic,
Recalling also our commitment, agreed in the Declaration of the Summit of Unity of Latin America and the Caribbean, on 23 February 2010, to promote the implementation of our own mechanisms for the for peaceful conflict resolution,
Reiterating our commitment to consolidate Latin America and the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace, in which differences between nations are peacefully settled through dialogue and negotiations or other means, fully consistent with International Law,
Cognizant also of the catastrophic global and long-term humanitarian impact of the use of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction, and the ongoing discussions on this issue,

1. Latin America and the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace based on respect for the principles and rules of International Law, including the international instruments to which Member States are a party to, the Principles and Purposes of the United Nations Charter;
2. Our permanent commitment to solve disputes through peaceful means with the aim of uprooting forever threat or use of force in our region;
3. The commitment of the States of the region with their strict obligation not to intervene, directly or indirectly, in the internal affairs of any other State and observe the principles of national sovereignty, equal rights and self-determination of peoples;
4. The commitment of the peoples of Latin American and Caribbean to foster cooperation and friendly relations among themselves and with other nations irrespective of differences in their political, economic, and social systems or development levels; to practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbors;…”

Heads of 31 Nations Declare a Zone of Peace, Commit to Uprooting Forever the Threat or Use of Force
by Jacqueline Cabasso, Executive Director, Western States Legal Foundation; 1-30-14


The years and decades since 1952 have been our government covetous of undeclared wars. However, to questions, indeed factors of radionuclides or nuclear molecular, have beset the directions of understudy with different discernible tenets one being low-level or high-level radionuclide. The second being, that of determining the evaluative complexities involving radionuclides measurements. The teleological methods became madness back in the 1950’s as the Cold War would not allow all any bed military investigation of killing, en masse, without stipulating how much radiation the human anatomy could absorb and all the verisimilitude’s of this encompassment. Since 1969, I have predicated that 200 thermo-Nuclear weapons was all that the new Rome would need in the nuclear arsenal. Knowing however and NSDU-238, was an appellation of the state having two, perforce, nuclear despicable contaminating contexts. The question in 1972, became how can science and nuclear-molecular research stipulate a method of manipulating radionuclides so that the premise of “vacuuming” microns could dispel the post war mongering haste to malicious human entropy.

Somehow, knowing the amounts of nuclear-molecular microns by measuring specific distances from NPP’s, would give credence to the amounts of particulate anti-matter. This, for me was a way to substantiate health beyond human cognizant obligation of health care. Contracting leukemias, inhaling uranium-238 became the military insubordinate method of madness, again and again, because soldiering was instilled for invasions rather than protection of civilian populations. This abstract has yet to go forward, is yet a part of the decadent empire’s society. There are two research discretions, that are ingrained in going forward to protect the individual from in discretionary radionuclides contaminations. One must study a positive effect of a negative usage, in other words by trying to allay decadence through social responsibility and scientific educational know-how. This is a piece proponent method, yes and no. The matter at hand is to try and confine brilliant new clients as they decay–a very difficult complex duplicity. “R”

“Shockingly, the irradiated rodents were almost completely unharmed. Other than some mild hair loss at the site of dosage, there was almost no cell death or damage when histological samples were checked.
“There was no skin laceration or muscle loss,” Dr. Isenberg says. “When we stained for cell death, we didn’t even see significant loss of bone marrow, which is exquisitely sensi-tive…to radiation damage.”
In comparison, control mice — who didn’t get the pathway-blocking treatment — were eaten away with tissue loss and “frank necrosis of the limbs.”
Currently, his lab is working toward getting funds for toxicology tests so at some point drugs could be developed for humans. He also plans studies to see how long an effective dose lasts — would someone get one-month, or one-year immunity following a dose?

Also, a bigger mystery is figuring out how, by blocking this pathway, cells are able to fix the damaged DNA within. Dr. Isenberg says they know that following radiation exposure, the DNA is scrambled, but somehow, with this treatment, the cells are able to get themselves right.
“It’s not that we’re blocking radiation from hitting the tissue,” he says. “Somehow… they repair themselves, and go about their business.”…”

Can a High-Tech Medicine Render Radiation Harmless?
by Washington’s Blog, Global Research, January 30, 2014

‘wars’ make factors of Destruction that ordinarily we need protect ourselves from natural-disasters instead of misleading venue of Life

end the wars, a voice fRom the VOId, the peace-Warrior

notes: bLog #267 peace-Remnant

Tags/ Heads of 31 Nations, Declare a Zone, of Peace, High-Tech Medicine, Render Radiation Harmless, Zone of Peace, Dr. Isenberg, Cooperation South Atlantic, stultifying unlawfulness, ventures, catastrophic global, long-term humanitarian impact, the use nuclear weapons, DNA, leukemia

Bio-sketch (2-27-16)…

I started into believing that I would be able to show my data and my photogRapHics in 1996. By 1998 I was learning computers would gain ascendant methods thru technics of programming for a future connected to data and information. That was nuclear-Molecular finding(s) to share and my personal-Activism w first account specifics and engendering(s).

As cameras went 'digital-Tech' I fond that editing was also to follow in 2004. Then, in 2005 my first digital camera had replaced usage(s) of s.l.r. 35 mm's. I have no mercy nor pity for the thieves who have stolen my hard werk, as anxiety of what I allowed was mid-stReam--anyway! Those asshole-Pukes have cost me $1,000's on a fixed income and I remain single, sole-Survivor of two-Families w.o. offspring!

This Post Has 0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

nine − nine =

Back To Top
×Close search