anti-nucleaRist bloG # 196/ 22 Jan 2014©
tactics, Mass Murder, g-Enron/ Oligarchs not arrested
Nothing said about “peace” since 1983, and nothing said about george-Enron showing words of ‘descritptness’ regarding the bankors of wall street cheating, his not sending national guard war-Materiels or bringing them back re: Katrina and deaths of 1,731 persons, either—just to name a slighting of words. The tactics of the fascist-state run thru tyranny of coRporations and the will of the we-people not to care for “Medicare and halting NSDU-238” is as effusive triumphalism as george-Enron who never expressed in public “one word” of why his father had to use d-F, NSDU-238? Not one word that I’ve seen on line or in books or internet reports. The disgust I have is the destruction the new-Rome has wrought upon “old-Babylon” meaning that Iraq and Egypt are archaeological digs of grave support of religiosity, or why “fundamentalism” was an empiricist-Imperative.
The “destabilization” of the middle-East continues from the disrupting tenets insurgent CIAs of democratically-Elected community representations to dictatorships installed by CIAs, again and again, like the domino theory of southeast-Asia. Syria was a pluralist society—a very interesting cultural one to visit. Like many nation-states of middle-East and north-Africa, semi-Stability in economics of elites/ oligarchs, and the very heart of the we-People was being burned-out—in 1980-1981, my peace-diplomat observations. The sociology of the we-People was strongest in Tunisia. The problem is food growing while the coRpoRate-welfare estate is demeaning to existence of arable lands w.o. GMO’s subsidies allocations. Khaddafi’s installing of waterworks systems and his support for AFRICOM was to allay the fear the CIAs will odiously install for military-Base establishment, which is now being accomplished because the anarchism that NATO brought about threw arms-Sales CIAs support, and ignominious NSDU-238 usages, altho promises by NATO provided fodder for lies. “R”
“Like Iran, the United States signed the NPT in 1968, and both states deposited their ratification of the NPT with the United Nations by the date it entered into force. But as one of the five declared nuclear weapon states-parties to the NPT (together with the Soviet Union [Russian Federation], Britain, France, and China), the United States undertook to “pursue negotiations in good faith . . . on a treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control,” which of course it has not done — and in fact the United States keeps refining its nuclear weapons and, along with its many-headed NATO puppet, has made nukes a continuing integral part of its “defense” planning.13
Because of its enormous buildup of nuclear overkill in past years (peaking in the mid-1980s), U.S. officials have been able to negotiate cuts in active nuclear weapons as well as phase out obsolete weapons, but at this point it maintains an estimated 3,000 operational nuclear weapons and with a number of these on constant alert. Under the Obama administration, funding for nuclear weapons has increased, and whether to claim first-strike rights for the United States is alleged to be one of the points under discussion in finalizing his 2010 Nuclear Posture Review.14 But whether or not the forthcoming NPR literally affirms U.S. first-strike rights, U.S. planners have long presumed such a right; for example, in Clinton’s Essentials of Postwar Deterrence (1995), we read that “it is undesirable to adopt declaratory policies such as ‘no first use’ which serve to specifically limit U.S. nuclear deterrence goals without providing equitable returns,” and that “We must be ambiguous about details of our response (or preemption) if what we value is threatened, but it must be clear that our actions would have terrible consequences.”15 Furthermore, the continued enlargement of NATO and the “out-of-area” rights and responsibilities that it asserts for itself,16 the expansion of the wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and the aggressive placement of both missile and anti-missile systems near Russia and China and the encirclement and systematic provocations of them both, which have caused Russia to depend more on nuclear weapons, have increased armaments and tensions across the globe.17
But of all the states-parties to the NPT with nuclear programs, Iran by far is under the closest scrutiny for adherence to all the rules of an NPT signer, and the imperial rights double standard is accepted and here rigorously enforced by the IC, UN, UNSC, and establishment media. According to the IAEA’s most recent Annual Report (2008), as of December 31, 2008, Iran’s Bushehr nuclear power plant, five different nuclear research reactors (at Esfahan, Arak, and Tehran), two uranium conversion plants (Esfahan), two fuel fabrication plants (Esfahan), a reprocessing plant in Tehran, two nuclear enrichment plants (Natanz), and a nuclear storage facility in Karaj were under IAEA safeguards;18 to this list we now may add the Fordow fuel enrichment plant near Qom, which Iran declared to the IAEA in September 2009, just days before this formal declaration was upstaged by the heads of state of the U.S., U.K., and France at a Group of 20 summit in Pittsburgh.19 The point is, the most heavily inspected nuclear program of the past decade most certainly is Iran’s, and only Iraq’s old and effectively liquidated nuclear program that had been inspected jointly by UNSCOM and the IAEA during the 1990s was more heavily inspected than is Iran’s.20 Indeed, of the 48 written reports the IAEA has devoted to its member-states’ nuclear programs since January 2003 (through February 2010), it devoted 58% of them (28 in all) to Iran’s implementation of its NPT-related obligations, while the IAEA also devoted six to Syria, five to Libya, three to North Korea, three to South Korea, two to Iraq, and one to Egypt.21 During the same period, the IAEA thus devoted only 7% of its written reports to the nuclear programs of states that are allied with the United States — a remarkable testament to the IAEA’s U.S.- and NATO-dominated politicization, which appears to have worsened with the December 1, 2009 succession in its Director General, with Egypt’s Mohamed ElBaradei unable to secure a third term, and his replacement by Japan’s Yukiya Amano.”
The Iran Threat in the Age of Real-Axis-of-Evil Expansion
by Edward S. Herman & David Peterson March 16, 2010 http://musictravel.free.fr/political/political92.htm
Let’s hire our own government as Revolution in uniforms of police-state say belligerence is worth getting beaten thrown into jail and illegally–Arrested first and foremost! What is a future choice nonetheless? New scientific improvements have not provided a means of lasers (always nuclear-Powered, by-the-way) to blast a 12 kilometers wide ancient solar-system stone known as ‘asteroid’. However, there is always global-climate change study not being considered “Ecology”? What is then, weather reduced by H.A.A.R.P. and whatever is the indifference eat your snoot out? In other words, when will the planet be protected from impact of comets and Asteroids, as well as “electromagnetic Sun’s blanket pulse” that will cut-off all electricity and electronics-Surveillance the polluted world covert”! The answer is polar-Bears are not as cuddly as they once were–never. Diet is to be contaminated for all of us by the new-Rome’s CHEM tRails now and then coupled w pulse-significance NASA doling out ‘dastardly excesses’ rather than protective shield ionization w.o. nuclear-Power?
Ohh, yes, science. “R”
“Polar bears have shifted to a diet of more land-based food in response to climate change and melting sea ice in the Arctic, new research finds. The results suggest that polar bears, at least in the western Hudson Bay area, may be slightly more flexible in the face of climate change than previously thought. “We found they were eating more of what is available on the land,” including snow geese, eggs and caribou, said study co-author Linda Gormezano, a vertebrate biologist at the American Museum of Natural History in New York.
Still, it’s not clear that this foraging strategy can offset the negative impacts of climate change, with one scientist saying it is unlikely to make a difference for polar bear numbers.
Polar bears rely heavily on seals and other marine mammals for food. The white bears wait at gaps in the sea ice for their blubbery prey to surface, then pounce, according to the nonprofit conservation organization Polar Bears International.
When the sea ice melts, polar bears come ashore and eat a variety of foods, including mushrooms and berries, in addition to snow geese and other animals. [See Images of Polar Bears Feasting on Prey]…But global warming has reduced Arctic sea ice extent, especially in the late spring when polar bears fatten up on seal pups before moving to land. As a result, the U.S. Endangered Species Act has listed the majestic beasts as a threatened species, and the International Union for Conservation of Nature lists them as vulnerable.”
Polar Bears Hunt on Land as Ice Shrinks
Live Science by Tia Ghose, Staff Writer 1-24-14–7 hours ago
Remember ‘wars’ are UN-principled, you get to rape, blunder, scatter NSDU-238 and look pTSD in the catatonic-Discrepant Imperialist ignominy start the clean-Ups of post-use NSDU-238 & defend the planet from IMpact.
a voice from the VOId, the peace-Warrior
note: bLog #264 peace-Remnant
Tags/ catatonic-Discrepant Imperialist ignominy, polar bears, global climate change, pulse contamination, electromagnetic, Bushehr nuclear power plant, Iran, tyranny coRporations, Ecology, new-Rome, NPT, U.S. first-strikes, UNSCOM, IAEA, NATO-dominated, politicization, Arctic sea, ice extent, non-Deterrence