skip to Main Content

anti-nucleaRist bloG #164/ 21 Dec 2013 Radionuclides not Religious fundamentalism, Material-Dialecticism

anti-nucleaRist bloG #164/ 21 Dec 2013 ©
Radionuclides not Religious fundamentalism, Material-Dialecticism

[1-11-17: Recently Pres. Duerte of Philippines made reference and followed thru to throw the US-Military bases in the country o-u-t. The impunity of US-Military making imounity a diplomacy was not mentioned by the past 6-presidents, all known for not supporting the oath to obey the US-Constitution. This, each one is an anarchist. The worst was gHW Bushwhacky of renown w Operation-40 selling and trading arms/rifles to rebels who prompted to invade Cuba and make waste for crime-Bosses (mobsters), prostitution, illegal drugs buying off union-bosses and making world-trade a havoc, rather than less hazardous due natural causes. Watching the youTube Vietnam series (1 thru 10 or more) is worthwhile in terms of history to our ‘boomer-Generation: era’]

The material-Dialecticism that is running rampant w “chemicals” is the same as that which was running interference for running-Rampant thru making usury of: deceits, Radionuclides-Lies, and heap-O piles of Radionuclides w.o. a vote in the 1940’s and 1950’s! What is never intended is to provide w others for the “basic-Good” and for “the Universal healthcare” that would offer. This linear progression has been ease for public-relations to pick-apart thru a calamacious-Excise known as “Psychology” rather than to assuage that anti-Nuclearist is Existentialism and therefore “nuclearism ”is Phenomenology! Therefore in an inimitable debased fashioning they portray flashiness as “defense” whereas, that also is never quite apparent and the world suffers onslaughts by comets, asteroids and pollutions-Galore. But, not too mention megalomaniacal-Murderers have been hired, but they’re not Slaves, they’re UN-justly reducing all species by upwards to 90%. “R”

“…In fact Hegel saw the interpenetration of opposites as one of the fundamental characters of all phenomena. Hegel’s philosophy is one of interconnectedness where the means and the end, the cause and the effect, are constantly changing place. It explains progress in terms of struggle and contradiction, not a straight line or an inevitable triumphal march forward. Hegel’s main mistake though was to see all of this development as essentially reflecting the movement of a mystical Idea or World Spirit.
Marx based his dialectical understanding of society on Hegel’s teachings, but he went further and combined dialectics the Materialist view of the world which sees the real objective world as the only existing one. Marx discovered that the dialectical laws were nothing more than the general underlying laws of nature and human society. The result is an understanding of the contradictions and ceaseless change in society and the economy. It is this dialectical understanding of society, ultimately, that gives Marxist thought its revolutionary character.

Formal logic
…Bohr interpreted the Uncertainty Principle, not as confirmation of the contradictory nature of matter, but instead as proof that we can never know about the objectively real world. The fact that the nature of matter changes as it is measured proves, according to Bohr, that our experience of the world is subjective and that any attempt at measuring the objective world will be thwarted by the very act of trying to measure it.
This is problematic because this leaves Bohr and his supporters defending a very unscientific position. The history of Science has been the expansion of the collective knowledge of the world and its processes. This endeavour is rendered impossible if there is no objective world to be discovered. The discoveries of one individual would apply only to the world as experienced by that individual and would have no general scientific application. In fact the only existence that would be left for any person to prove would be the existence of their own thoughts.
Ironically, by rejecting the dialectical ideas of contradiction and the unity of opposites, Bohr placed himself in the contradictory position of being a scientist arguing against science.”

“Quantum physics, dialectics and society: from Marx and Engels to Khrennikov and Haven”
Written by Ben Gliniecki Wednesday, 04 December 2013


One longest itineracy on Conditionalisms by penataGooons, has been their interest in neglection at their own demise. This self-congratulatory method is costly to personnel surrounding the most dangerous of weapons and toys. In other words, by the omission that ur-238 has no long term affectations and no investigative purpose into getting at how the radiologic exposures interact, as well as how they permeate by nano-Microns makes for the excuse to become he fecund “surety” of propaganda-Tool. Like a “false-Flag operation” this is one of the best if not the primary exemplary of one-of-those-Things, if ever in need of disguise for falsity and lack of reproof to not clean-UP usages, use-areas, and firing-Grounds. Has the idea been connected w N.A.T.O. practice areas?

The handling and storing is always of concern w any military or militia forces. However, in two areas of the world that the IMpunity has proceeded most geographically are Okinawa, a people militarily taken over by Nipponese who began their aggressions during expansionist imperialist plutocracy, AND Scotland where the British crown, begat the imperialist legacy alongside other European states out the compassion to progress, leave humanity the in lurches of healthcare needs w.o. healthcare.
The question remains will NSDU-238 ever get cleaned-UP because the radionuclides from that are generated are hard-metal which evolves more exposure microns–gets worse w time—sitting around or empty brainless. “R”

“…both the documents and previous statements by the MoD suggest that there is no intention to seek to recover the more than 30 tonnes of DU rounds that have been fired from the range into the sea. Recovery, they argue, would be technically difficult, costly and ‘set a dangerous precedent’. OSPAR is vague on what differentiates placing and dumping but campaigners argue that placing requires an intention to remove the waste.
CADU’s Aneaka Kellay said: “It is a sign of desperation that the MoD has resorted to semantic trickery to evade its responsibilities as it seeks to justify more DU dumping in Scottish waters.”

In a report published last year, CADU highlighted the means through which the MoD has historically sought to distract attention from the intrinsic unacceptability of DU weapons and circumvent democratic processes to ensure that the controversial weapons would be developed and tested. “As early as the 1970s, the MoD was warned that ‘losing’ this DU in the Solway Firth would not be viewed as an acceptable form of disposal under the predecessor to the OSPAR Convention,” said Aneaka Kellay. “It looks as if this deception is finally catching up with them.”

Scottish parliamentarians reacted angrily to the news after it triggered considerable media interest across Scotland, the anger is particularly acute among those whose constituency the range lies in. Dr Aileen McLeod, Scottish National Party (SNP) MSP for the south of Scotland branded the MoD’s behaviour as: “…a cynical attempt to get round international agreements designed to protect the environment, so that test firing of DU shells can continue.”

“Revelations over legality of Scottish depleted uranium testing trigger fresh anger”
14 March 2013 – ICBUW

One should not beg, whether hungry and sitting down on cold sidewalk oR needing governance w Justice

a voice from the VOId, the peace-Warrior

–note: bLog #234 peace-People

Tags/ Revelations, legality Scottish, NSDU-238, depleted uranium, testing, 30 tonnes of DU rounds, CADU highlighted, Radionuclides-Lies, heap-O piles, Radionuclides, Bohr, interpreted, Uncertainty Principle, Hegel saw, interpenetration of opposites, Marx based his dialectical understanding of society, Dr Aileen McLeod, Scottish National Party,

Bio-sketch (2-27-16)…

I started into believing that I would be able to show my data and my photogRapHics in 1996. By 1998 I was learning computers would gain ascendant methods thru technics of programming for a future connected to data and information. That was nuclear-Molecular finding(s) to share and my personal-Activism w first account specifics and engendering(s).

As cameras went 'digital-Tech' I fond that editing was also to follow in 2004. Then, in 2005 my first digital camera had replaced usage(s) of s.l.r. 35 mm's. I have no mercy nor pity for the thieves who have stolen my hard werk, as anxiety of what I allowed was mid-stReam--anyway! Those asshole-Pukes have cost me $1,000's on a fixed income and I remain single, sole-Survivor of two-Families w.o. offspring!

This Post Has 0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

six − two =

Back To Top
×Close search