anti-nucleaRist bloG #51/ 29 Sep 2011 NSDU-238 or Why Ralph Nader holds an anti-Nuclearist view-point

image_pdfimage_print

anti-nucleaRist bloG #51/ 29 Sep 2011

NSDU-238 or Why Ralph Nader holds an anti-Nuclearist view-point

 

Mr. Nader states (the following):

 

“…”Because of the mainstream media, including the major newspapers, blackout on the Yablokov report since its translated edition came out in 2009, I asked Dr. Yablokov this question at the news conference: “Dr. Yablokov, you are a distinguished scientist in your country, as reflected in your member-ship in the Russian Academy of Sciences, what has been the response to your report by corporate scientists, regulatory agency scientists and academic scientists in the West? Did they openly agree in whole or in part or did they disagree in whole or in part or were they just silent?”

 

Academician Yablokov replied that the compilation of these many reports has been met with silence. He added that science means critical engagement with the data and implied that silence was not an appropriate response from the scientific community.

 

Silence, of course, is not without its purpose. For to engage, whether to rebut, doubt or affirm, would give visibility to this compendium of scientific studies that upsets the fantasy modeling by the nuclear industry and its apologists regarding the worse case scenario damage of a level 7 or worse meltdown. It would require, for example, more epidemiological studies ranging into Western Europe, such as the current review of 330 hill farms in Wales. It would insistently invite more studies of the current health and casualty data involving the 800,000 liquidators—workers passing through since 1986 who have been exposed in and around the continuing emergency efforts at the very hot disabled Chernobyl reactor. And much more.

 

Public silence has not excluded a sub silentio oral campaign to delegitimize the Yablokov compendium. A quiet grapevine of general dismissals—unavailable for public comment or rebuttal—has cooled members of the press and other potential disseminators of its contents, including the National Academy of Sciences, the science advisers to the President and any other thinking scientists who decide that there isn’t enough time or invulnerability to justify getting into a contentious interaction over the Yablokov report.

 

The ability of corporate science and its regulatory apologists to inflict sanctions on dissenters is legion. There is a long history of censorship leading to self- censorship by those who otherwise might have applied Alfred North Whitehead’s characterization of science as “keeping open options for revision” to the ideology of atomic power.

 

I call for an open rigorous public scientific-medical debate on the findings and casualty estimates of the Yablokov report, to determine its usefulness for necessary programs of compensation, quarantine, accelerated protective entombment of the still dangerous reactor, and expanded studies of the past and continuing ravages issuing from this catastrophe and its recycling of radioactivity through the soil, air, water and food of the exposed regions. Such a public review is what the science adviser to the President and the National Academy of Sciences should have done already and should do now. The continuing expansion of the Fukishima disaster in Japan provides additional urgency for this open scientific review.”

 

Nuclear Disasters Should Be Met with Scientific Inquiry, Not

Silence by Ralph Nader Tuesday, April 26, 2011 by CommonDreams.org

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/04/26-10

 

 

a voice fRom the VOId, the peace- Warrior, “R” Addison

 

Tags/ Dr. Yablokov, Russian Academy of Sciences, pu-239 & ur 235, radiologic contamination, Mr. Ralph Nader, 800,000 liquidators, scientific inquiry, scientific review, Fukishima (Dai-ichi’s) disaster, NSDU-238, delegitimize,

 

 

"R" Addison

i love swimming, philos0phy, ecoloGy and photogRaphy enough to tRavel the whole continent--on foot--and sought thought-Discourse w some of America's most renown thinkoRs...my love of women is parable to self-Self: Consciousness...i helped to start Ecosocialism in 1969 and remain adherent of Zen-Existentialism. (8-17-15)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *