anti-nucleaRist bloG 199/ 28 Jan 2014 ©
Meltdowns Daiichis’, Chaos, Eco-Marxism
Elections have become battle-grounds for power, whether central-Americas or the new-Rome. That N.A.T.O. is involving themselves in Afghanistan, helps the illegal heroin-trade, thru purchases of opium protected by warlords chaos connected to why Afghanistan is a tribalist-State, not a modern IMF controlled nation-State. Women had become a membership league in parliamentary procedures in Afghanistan by 1979. The US thru Brezinski’s rhetoric was a capitalism not an IMperialist consequence—that akin pNAC—relegated communism not to Feminism and political-Parties of socialism can and have been, traditionally, more democratic than the staid, capitalist pig nations, such as the earlier rhetoric of 1969 new-Rome. Afghanistan is a cool disgrace to the we-People of US who know that “socialism” started in US Republic 1830’s and continued over the control by coRpoRations from 1881, and since. Colonialism led to IMperialism, and history books, in and of public-Educational ‘standards’ looked akin Bourgeois society to Marx and Engels in Europe. Theirs was a noticeable chagrin regarding “capitalism” in days when even ticker-Tape news was not proponent of big-Business, and ergonomics of Thomas Edison, and of Jekyl Island precursor’s of Federal Reserve ‘ram-Act’ in 1913. Okay, not okay!
From these tenets of factorable premising by Oligarchic consortium, an excising has happened and continues to occur. Ecology, therefore has had roots since before Karl Marx died in 1881. Eco-socialism roots goads since 1840’s when temperances of colonialism and exterminations of indige-Amers and resource-orientations affable/ inaffable were relegated as inarticulate to withheld stats on facts that secrecy is capable of making takeovers and stealing lands from indigenous people and placing those sections of arable or worthwhile acreages into smaller hands of manipulations extra-Large sizes. Marx was chagrined as many millions have become knowing no roots, that human nature needs “actual-Ecology” the natural aspects that are factored w living closest outdoors and viewing climate as well as gReeneRy. “R”
“Karl Marx and Frederick Engels developed a far more nuanced understanding of the way that human society interacts with nature. They began by locating humans as part of nature, but also understanding that what makes us human is our ability to labour and shape nature. For Marx, far from a socialist society further destroying the environment, it would heal the “metabolic rift” between human society and nature that had developed with the rise of capitalism. Under capitalism we are alienated from the natural world, trapped in a system where production is driven irrationally for profit.
This Marxist approach to an ecological understanding of our society comes out clearly when we look at Marx and Engels’ approach to historical change. Looking at the struggles of the past can also show us how a sustainable society can be built after the revolutionary overthrow of capitalism.Speaking at Karl Marx’s funeral, Engels summed up the core ideas of his friend’s ideas. He noted the “iron law of development of human history” that “mankind must first of all eat, drink, have shelter and clothing, before it can pursue politics, science, art, religion”.
In other words, before humans can do anything else, they must have the basic necessities of life. They do this through an interaction with the natural world that they themselves are part of.
Precisely how humans have organised to do this has varied enormously throughout history. Today for the first time in human history the majority of people live in urban areas which can make the natural world can seem remote.”
What part of the apportioning of peoples pertaining to social-tasks plays in the cultural-domain is constantly at issue and therefor odds or stats that inter-connect the need for proclivities where “understanding and Logic” would soon be the outgrowth of Engels and Marx. There was a Universal diecast that was being denigrated by coRpoRate Elites in their nebulousness of markets enterprise for the rich to get richer, thru the Oligarchic obsequious diecast of propagandating and deceits for control and ripping-off “democracy-Practices” which is where democracy relates to most of us, not thru an el Congress of one-party pejoratives, aka new-Rome, since 1945, but thru the context of multiplicity, not being duplicitous. “R”
“But Marx’s insight was far more than simply acknowledging that humans interact with the natural world. He understood that the particular way human’s organised production helped to determine the type of society that they lived in.
Thus hunter-gatherers needed to live in small groups. Their nomadic life meant small numbers and few possessions. This was how people lived for much of our history. Such societies were egalitarian, and hunter-gatherer communities are marked by a much larger degree of equality between men and women.
But as human society changed, our relationship with the natural world changed. When humans developed agriculture, it became possible for class societies to arise. This “Neolithic Revolution” meant that for the first time in history not everyone had to be involved in producing food.”
Marxism, ecology and human history
posted December 10th 2013, by Ian angus
Semi-protected is not defense from interstellar-Space that oNLY galactic-cosmos knows-for-sure, is yet chaos of the Universe.
There is a myriad of opinions but most, at the least may include the one or two facts that teevee microphone in mouth placements seems to proffer for lacking analysis, that which maintains lack-of factuality basics. As a part-time “journalist” I found that small liberal-rags were proponent of the other status-Quotient such as Environmentalism, rather than Ecology. The other was, that my coverage was more geographical formulatively, and that I use words by definition and by vocabulary, rather as a professional, not a laid back has to be “colloquialist” benign amenity to state nothing but maybe somethingy-Bop. The reportage is important and too often capitalist cRonyism w one-Party parodizes, so that generally speaking, no follow-thru has yet occurred, but “headlines” are emotional and not laid back is not always the case, as those may be nothing but “laid-back”. Words too, change but not there meanings, UN-less rightwing radicalist paradigms “dictate” that manner is always an illegitimate use. Thus, I use the word-Term: wordage—and try not to formulate typos have no definition.
The NWO is the use and usages of NSDU-238, in other words. The NWO is the new-Rome. The NWO is the IMF and N.A.T.O. is a standard bearer of egregious-Empire, evil-Empire: the new-Rome. Egregious society is the smoking gun, that which I call down as the word-Term “smogging-Gun”. This seems to encapsulate NSDU-238 is propagandized into non-obsession as much as total-Obsession has been CHEM-tRails capitalist-IMperialism is totally not ‘insulated’ from the we-People. They UN-justly keep-on-smogging, because LNG is 5X more volatile UN-less Kevlar-protected 1/4 inch fuel-tanks and surety can be better-Defend, cheap fuel is morosely less significant because the pollution is not the solution. Peace was ruined by the big-Business correlative that “explosions can happen” yet they forgot to mention “fire”. The Oil companies put a torch to LNG before 1974 was o-u-t because greed was accessible and el-congress could become corrupted under Nixon as well as LBJ had caused wars not economic-Advancement for all-Ethnicities, rather than integration and gReat Society, Oil and begging not discussion on the second mass-Invasion of sovereign-States for chemical-companies and nuclear-Policy programs kept to the wayside.
Why would not the NWO be inconsiderate to the society, great or not-Great, was also discussed by the we-Boomers, who placed Consciousness ahead of rhetoric, and in doing so found mass ornamentation for the word-term “egregious”. JFK’s ‘social-Welfare program’ was called the New Frontier, and Johnson’s social-Program failed because he became Bourgeois and may have been inculcated from military-contractor’s or not. His social-Welfare went to capitalist-Priggish waste of $181 billion spent. in 1967 dollars for an illegal and UN-declare war for military-Hegemonic enterprising i.e. warfare not welfare cronyism. “R”
“The important debate on global warming under UN auspices provides but a partial picture of climate change; in addition to the devastating impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the ozone layer, the World’s climate can now be modified as part of a new generation of sophisticated “non-lethal weapons.” Both the Americans and the Russians have developed capabilities to manipulate the World’s climate.
In the US, the technology is being perfected under the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) as part of the (“Star Wars”) Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI). Recent scientific evidence suggests that HAARP is fully operational and has the ability of potentially triggering floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes. From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction. Potentially, it constitutes an instrument of conquest capable of selectively destabilising agricultural and ecological systems of entire regions.
While there is no evidence that this deadly technology has been used, surely the United Nations should be addressing the issue of “environmental warfare” alongside the debate on the climatic impacts of greenhouse gases…
Despite a vast body of scientific knowledge, the issue of deliberate climatic manipulations for military use has never been explicitly part of the UN agenda on climate change. Neither the official delegations nor the environmental action groups participating in the Hague Conference on Climate Change (CO6) (November 2000) have raised the broad issue of “weather warfare” or “environmental modification techniques (ENMOD)” as relevant to an understanding of climate change.
The clash between official negotiators, environmentalists and American business lobbies has centered on Washington’s outright refusal to abide by commitments on carbon dioxide reduction targets under the 1997 Kyoto protocol.(1) The impacts of military technologies on the World’s climate are not an object of discussion or concern. Narrowly confined to greenhouse gases, the ongoing debate on climate change serves Washington’s strategic and defense objectives.
World renowned scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell confirms that “US military scientists … are working on weather systems as a potential weapon. The methods include the enhancing of storms and the diverting of vapor rivers in the Earth’s atmosphere to produce targeted droughts or floods.” (2) Already in the 1970s, former National Security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski had foreseen in his book “Between Two Ages” that:
“Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised… [T]echniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm.”
Marc Filterman, a former French military officer, outlines several types of “unconventional weapons” using radio frequencies. He refers to “weather war,” indicating that the U.S. and the Soviet Union had already “mastered the know-how needed to unleash sudden climate changes (hurricanes, drought) in the early 1980s.”(3) These technologies make it “possible to trigger atmospheric disturbances by using Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) radar [waves].”…”
Washington’s New World Order Weapons Have the Ability to Trigger Climate Change by Michel Chossudovsky, Prof. of Economics, Univ. of Ottawa, Third World Resurgence, January 2001–Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG) globalresearch.ca, 4 Jan 2002 http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO201A.html
end the illegal-Invasions,
note: bLog #225 peace-Remnant
Tags/ NWO, pentagon, new weapons, kill weapons, Global Research, Marxism, ecology and human history, meltdowns, Daiichis’, chaos, humans interact, w natural, world, ecology, human history, weather warfare, Dr. Rosalie Bertell,