anti-nucleaRist bloG #110/ 3 Mar 2012 sanguineness not to be against-Wars sickens

my plight w NSDU-238 (has not been divulged) merely well wRitten!
youTube “Killing Our Own : The Truth About Gulf War Syndrome”
1:23:08 mins (not enough views) BUTTHOLDS

anti-nucleaRist bloG #110/ 3 Mar 2012

sanguineness not to be against-Wars sickens

 

The sanguineness not to be anything against these illegal wars is as sick as a non-Heralded people can be to not portray their sickness. Wow, what a guessing game. The empire-Wins while you’re out-Nowhere guessing. Are you sick of not having Universal “healthcare for all” too? Take my self as an example of anti-War since 1963 but anti-Nuclear: policy since 1961. Which comes first, is not a question but a Conditionalized “malaise”. You need malaise don’t you! Buttholds. I was yet a teenaged! You know pimples, masturbation, girls popping, and books reading before thoughts of honoring a public-display on the track or baseball diamond or football field. Life was out-There: thrilling because the wars were not here on the “field”. A mite “provincialist” and an hypothecary of shallowness, or feelings of expressions of non-Knowing thoughts displayed i.e. doing before thinking or reacting. Reactionaryism was rampant in hose days of softening the plutocracy for a new-Improved CFR or more than “1,000” thermo-Nuclears while the band could not play NSDU-238 blowing-in-the-wind.

 

We, the inner-Circle, all knew that NSDU-238 was around, and the reminder-sessions were non-Eventfully put-aside or morosely even ‘castigated’ by some others who were none-the-wiser for beings aware have a pattern-in-Thought. That is called Consciousness. Back then the same ole argument did not exist, was nowhere near the same as today. Depleted Uranium or NSDU-238 was not the word, but the vogue. The issue then was what is w.i. the task and what isotopes are the keepers of uranium being deceitfully “prescient-Radiation” but always a killer far beyond that of earth’s predators. We’re talking cosmology and gaseous-Extent, buttholds! Then they turned “dudes”. The slimy was rightwing-Reactionaryism and the Vietnam war was starting by bombers of u-S air-Force from Laos. But, hold, Laos is in southeast-Asia, where asian’s speak a different language are merely third world. Not even from china-Town in dN-tN- san-fran, man. Why attack a third-World state, dude-Buttholds. Radiation. Makes illogic that way, too! Let’s see where ‘radiation goes into defense’?

 

Act of Valor, which opened nationwide this past weekend as the top-selling movie in the U.S., is perhaps the closest yet that Hollywood has come to producing a pure propaganda film for the “Military-Entertainment Complex.”

For the past 25 years, since the release of Top Gun, the film industry has enjoyed a growing bond with the Department of Defense. In exchange for allowing filmmakers to use military weapons and hardware, and film on defense installations, Hollywood has gladly offered up stories long on heroics and short on criticisms of war or policy.

The friendship between the Pentagon and the studios got even chummier last year with X-Men: First Class. The military was so pleased with the summer blockbuster that it used footage from it in its recruitment campaigns.”

 

There’s oNLY one BIG trouble w films being merely depictive. They leave out the heft-part, i.e. used-to-be-called ‘the good part’ before girls became equal partners w men-skis. Now hear this “NSDU-238 is both nuclear-molecular-Contaminations galore and kills youngsters and prenatal births look swell-Atrocious”. Yes, people, NSDU-238 is NOT IN THE BAROSE HOLYWOOD Plotless lines and usury of film ‘digitally depictions’.      “R”

 

‘Act of Valor’ and the Rise of the US Military-Entertainment Complex

Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky All Gov Feb 28, 2012

http://www.infowars.com/act-of-valor-and-the-rise-of-the-us-military-entertainment-complex/

 

AND

 

What is swell about NSDU-238 22 years after u-s penataGooons, delayed usages all the way from1973—when IDF’s first world-Use was the epiphany of world-Use: firsts. Where were you? Let’s hear once again the staid facts that “all Uranium is radiologic or radiation”! Is this where the “military-Hegemony” gets zapped by “nuclear-powered ray-Guns” or merely by ray-Guns of radioisotopes”? May be you ought to get zapped.         “R”

 

“Depleted Uranium (DU) is a chemically toxic and radioactive, heavy metal which is produced as a by-product of the enrichment of uranium for civil nuclear power programmes. It is used in armour-piercing munitions because of its very high density; DU is 1.7 times denser than lead, giving DU weapons increased range and penetrative power.

Why is it a problem?

The use of DU in weapons disperses toxic and radioactive dust which can then be inhaled. It is thought that using DU has caused a sharp increase in the incidence rates of some cancers, such as breast cancer and lymphoma, in areas of Iraq following 1991 and 2003.
It has also been implicated in a rise in birth defects from areas adjacent to the main Gulf War battlefields. While we have a reasonable idea how much DU was used in the Balkans (12,700kg) and the 1991 Gulf War (290,300kg) there is little data on the extent of its use following the 2003 invasion in Iraq. One estimate put the total at 140,000kg by early 2004. What is clear is that far more has been used in urban areas; this is because of a move towards asymmetric warfare and an increasingly cavalier approach to the use of DU.

 

Where has depleted uranium been used and who uses it?

DU was used on a large scale by the US and the UK in the Gulf War in 1991, then in Bosnia, Serbia and Kosovo, and again in the war in Iraq by the US and the UK in 2003. At least 17 countries are thought to have weapon systems containing DU. Many of them were sold DU ammunition by the US while others, including UK, France, Russia, Pakistan and India are thought to have developed it independently.

The legal status of depleted uranium weapons

Although no sole treaty explicitly banning the use of DU is yet in force, it is clear that using DU runs counter to the basic rules and principles enshrined in written and customary International Humanitarian Law. In 2006, the European Parliament strengthened its previous calls for a moratorium by calling for the introduction of a total ban, classifying the use of DU, along with white phosphorous, as inhumane. 
In 2007, Belgium became the first country in the world to ban all conventional weapons containing uranium. Other states are set to follow their example. 
In February 2008 the Italian government elected to offer compensation to Italian veterans made ill in Iraq and the Balkans and agreed to invest millions of Euros into DU research.

 

CND is a member of the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons (ICBUW). Based in Manchester, UK and administered by the Campaign Against Depleted Uranium (CADU), ICBUW has 95 member organisations in 26 countries worldwide,  ICBUW is the best initiative yet to achieve a ban on all conventional weapons containing uranium. Even though the use of weapons containing uranium should already be illegal under International Humanitarian, Human Rights and Environmental Laws, an interna-tional treaty, such as those treaties already banning chemical and biological weapons, landmines and cluster bombs, is vital to enforce their abolition.

There is a growing consensus among civil society groups, scientists and some military organisations that the health risks from DU have been seriously underestimated. Established scientific bodies have been slow to react to the wealth of new research into DU and policy makers have been content to ignore the claims of researchers and activists. Deliberate obfuscation by the mining, nuclear and arms industries has further hampered efforts to recognise the problem and achieve a ban.”[1] [1]

 

The previous passages is my way of being rid the ubiquitous manner of trying to universally define a “nuclear-Molecular: weapon” and the uses and usages, portrayed as well as resolves sought, this thru a comparative analytic declension, or break-away view of this “modern-Day: fugue”. Here goes:

 

Not-so-depleted Uranium-238 is a chemical toxin and a multiple-radioisotope nuclear-Molecular formulation of ultra-Hard: metal and radioactivity of which 60% is composite “fissile” and this is because in making nuclear-Electricity: steam (@ NPP’s) and in production lines of thermo-Nuclear weapons warhead’s making (for belligerent overtures) the processes end in ur-238 and pu-239, for power-Plants, while for armaments “enriching-processes” extract one isotope from the morass to make a purity of “thermo-Grade” while all else is left to “ultra-Microns” portions of munition aerosolized as penetrators, or wing-tips of aero-Jets. While lead is many times denser, yet more pliable, grades of hardened-steel have carbon molecules additionally.

 

NSDU-238 is your basic usury, which is that “killing civilians helps bring militaries into contamination playfields” i.e. to use military lingo. This is a problem, since they use and make covetous any clean-UP for both their own armies and the masse` of civilians. Most haphazardly is that the “first: half-Life” of NSDU-238 is merely 4.46 billion years or full reduction of half-lives then is 44.6 billions years. While the age of the planet-Erathe’s solar system is stat @ 4.5 billion years, human-kind has done-in a molecular-structure that is far beyond average age of the Universe or 13.5 billion years.

 

Like the gaseous-Extent w.i. the Universe or at least w.i. the Milky Way Galaxy, this fact may prove harmful off the planet as well as demographically upon the planets meagre 3-feet average thickness crust topsoils—growing soils. That the discovery in 2001-02, by radia-tion-Monitoring proved the wond-borne microns were susceptible to winds-Plight made for drastic measures by United nations and European governments as well as the whole world due the dire-Cast indigent-Needs to halt first use and “to defend” from contact, which is humanly impossible w.o. totally blocking the air’s passage i9nto heart and lungs. The same can now be said for Daiichi’s 1-2-3 meltdowns being “more, not less” a contamination purveyance for total “cancerous contact via airbourne “radionuclides contamination-Spredations”. The fact-over-fallacy is this juncture in relativism that “defending –Populations from non-use of radionuclides is now more a prescience than total eradication, altho “both need radiologic Measuring on a masse` scale” to make any furtive use, usage and storages of NSDU-238 into morose immoralism which is equal to that of Dai-ichi’s! No, as both are dissimilar and until such measurements how is one to connote cancers 30-years down-the-road from what source. Contamination is not chemical change, altho nerve agents and chemical toxins are amassed and also in needs of clean-UPs.        “R”

 

Depleted Uranium (or NSDU-238: issue w.i. the task and “R” Addison’s apeco analysis 3-02-12)  http://www.cnduk.org/campaigns/depleted-uranium

 

AND

 

“Today there are more than 20,000 nuclear weapons in the world (over 5000 of which are deployed, the rest stockpiled). The majority are held by the United States and Russia. Other countries: the UK, France, China, India, Pakistan, Israel and possibly North Korea, are also nuclear-armed. Many of the nuclear weapons held around the world have hundreds of times more explosive power than the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945 which completely destroyed the city and killed around 140,000 people. 

Nuclear weapons have no legitimate purpose; nor would their use be legal (civilian casualties are unavoidable), they are also genocidal and utterly immoral. When confronted with any of today’s real security threats nuclear weapons are irrelevant: they cannot address climate change, poverty, hunger, overpopulation, non-state armed groups or terrorists, and they are useless against pandemics such as AIDS or avian flu. 

Not only do nuclear weapons kill indiscriminately but the radioactive fallout from their detonation means that their effects know no geographical boundaries. Immediate survivors in the vicinity of any nuclear exchange face devastating long-term ill effects or death. Research shows that even a so-called ‘small exchange’ of 50 nuclear weapons could cause ‘the largest climate change in recorded human history’ and potentially could kill more people than were killed in the whole of the Second World War.

As long as there are nuclear weapons in the world there is always the danger they will be used, whether by accident or intention.”

 

This is good info. See how we-Boomers really-really “failed’ to get NSDU-238 into the foreground soooo that the mushrooms issues could become merely “shrrooms”. I don’t either, but we failed none-the-Less to bring the back-Burnor’s onto the front to time-Space that something is in the way, as a weigh-IN and is also “nuclear-Molecular: radionuclides” not so meagre. This is oNLY a time-Warp of about 50 years buttholds, superficial-Dudes and enmity w.o. entropy: minus. Like wow, another war-movie.           “R”

 

Global Abolition Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament

[3-02-12] http://www.cnduk.org/campaigns/global-abolition

 

All geographical areas measured by square-Miles must be brought down to square inches. The grotesque atmosphere of “allowability” has been proven to be IMPunity for such surreptitions that cover-UPs about studies not-being-allowed is merely for the insurance that IMpunity retains usages, when in the first analysis Radiation is any uranium molecule”!  The all and any illegal INvasions catharsis, inespecially by the u-S Empire, must be paid for by them and intern back-off from trying to promote peace in the similar distrust of INforma-tion as the ill-rebuke of dis-INformation was wont and subject of INvasions. Distrust rather than “harmony” of the principles and respect for law and natural belonging w the whole-Earth have been immensely hampered by these megalomaniacs and their tyranny-Charades.             “R”

 

In the minority 

The desire for global abolition of nuclear weapons is strong internationally. Many countries have signed treaties to make large areas of the world into nuclear weapons free zones. These cover Southeast Asia, Central Asia, the South Pacific, Latin America and Africa; 180 non-nuclear weapon states have signed the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty – they don’t possess nuclear weapons and their safety does not depend on owning them. The UK is one of only a handful of states that has nuclear weapons. 

Our choice to re-arm, instead of disarming, through the decision to replace our current Trident nuclear weapons system, is a signal to the rest of the world that we believe our security depends on weapons of mass destruction. But the same argument could be used by any country in the world. It is not impossible that the UK should decide to rid itself of nuclear weapons as required by the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Four countries — South Africa, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine have already done so. In so doing, we would be complying with our obligations to disarm under the NPT, contributing to progress towards multilateral disarmament, and helping to create a climate where states turn away from nuclear weapons altogether.

 

Multilateral disarmament 

CND calls for multilateral disarmament initiatives, to go hand in hand with British nuclear disarmament, to ensure that the goal of worlwide abolition can be achieved. This call has found a resonance internationally. Leading international figures like Kofi Annan, Hans Blix and Mohammed ElBaradei, have all urged serious attention to nuclear disarmament. Now they have been joined by former senior US politicians Henry Kissinger and George Schulz and others, have recently called for steps to be taken towards this goal.

ICAN”

 

 “CND is working with Medact and other peace organisations in the UK to promote the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN). ICAN was launched by medical professionals in 60 countries, to promote a Nuclear Weapons Convention. Landmines and chemical and biological weapons have already been outlawed through treaties. Nuclear weapons can be similarly abolished through a Nuclear Weapons Convention, a draft of which is already lodged at the UN.

Read ICAN UK’s Q&A on a Nuclear Weapons Convention to understand more about why it is so vital such a worldwide ban is negotiated now.

The hypocritical claim that nuclear weapons are valuable instruments in some hands, but intolerable threats when owned by others, must be abandoned. CND urges the government to support the proposed Nuclear Weapons Convention as a practical way of meeting the disarmament goals of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.”

 

Global Abolition Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament [3-02-12]

http://www.cnduk.org/campaigns/global-abolition

 

Neither george-ENron, nor bully-Clyneton had the demeanor to use the word peace, and utilize those principles we-Boomers set-UP for them… they’re both Oligarchs who  tried using NSDU-238 as an anti-Nuclear: weapon… noose!

 

a voice fRom the VOId, the peace-Warrior,        “R” Addison

 

[1] “Depleted Uranium” by Campaign for Nuclear disarmament… http://www.cnduk.org/campaigns/depleted-uranium

–notes: ODO bLog #6

Tags/ 60% is, composite “fissile”, anti-matter, thermo-Nuclears, Daiichi’s 1-2-3 meltdowns, healthcare, for all, radiologic Measuring, IDF’s first world-Use, time-Warp, Depleted Uranium, NSDU-238, IMpunity

 

[1] Depleted Uranium” by Campaign for Nuclear disarmament… http://www.cnduk.org/campaigns/depleted-uranium

"R" Addison

i love swimming, philos0phy, ecoloGy and photogRaphy enough to tRavel the whole continent--on foot--and sought thought-Discourse w some of America's most renown thinkoRs...my love of women is parable to self-Self: Consciousness...i helped to start Ecosocialism in 1969 and remain adherent of Zen-Existentialism. (8-17-15)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *